Long War Journal: US offers reward for information on 2 senior AQAP leaders
The State Department announced today that it is offering rewards of $5 and $10 million for information concerning two Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) leaders. Both jihadists attended al Qaeda training camps in pre-9/11 Afghanistan before relocating to Yemen, where they eventually assumed leadership positions. They are openly loyal to al Qaeda’s overall emir, Ayman al Zawahiri.
Qasim al-Raymi (or al-Rimi) was named AQAP’s emir in June 2015 after his predecessor, Nasir al-Wuhayshi, was killed in an American drone strike. Raymi quickly reaffirmed his allegiance to the “beloved father,” Zawahiri, after assuming AQAP’s top spot.
Read more ....
Update: U.S. Puts $15 Million Bounty on Heads of al Qaeda Leaders (Washington Free Beacon)
WNU Editor: The problem with these rewards is that when you get rid of one .... there is always someone there to replace him.
9 comments:
"The problem with these rewards is that when you get rid of one .... there is always someone there to replace him."
Kill rate has to be greater than the replacement rate.
Kill rate > replacement rate.
It is not, so obviously we are not serious.
One contributor at SOFREP said "IF you have not wiped out your enemy in 3 years time, you are training them" (paraphrase)
So the dilettante West is training Muslim jihadists.
You would think that women, gays, etc would be concerned, but they seem more concerned with tilting at windmills.
Maybe devout Muslims will allow women in America to wear pussy hats and vulva scarves it it covers up everything?
Move Over Vagina Costumes: Fendi Debuts $990 Designer 'Vulva Scarf'
We're in a civilizational war and the best the Left can do is a woman, who molested her little sister, Lena Dunham, and Amy Goodman.
We are so screwed.
Why the need to dumb some nothing-to-add-but my-contempt to an article that is a real issue? Your sidetracking tells us nothing except your worries about someone not like you or someone perhaps you would like to be like but are thus far fearful and so remain closeted?
What would Barack H. Obama do?
One contributor at SOFREP said "IF you have not wiped out your enemy in 3 years time
HOW LONG DID IT TAKE TO WIN WORLD WAR II? OH, MORE THAN 3 YEARS
At least in 1944 we knew that we were attriting NAZI strength faster than they were replacing it.
There were many in the Luftwaffe and Wehrmacht in 1944 with a lot of experience, but due to the logistics situation and the manpool situation it did them no good.
This offer seems silly. For show only. The logistics of turning in the clowns' locations seem daunting. Getting the reward more so. Especially with the risks of the likes of not-so-finestein leaking you.
Then there is the Pakistani Dr. who greatly aided our reducing OBL to molecules in the ocean. [Even the EPA didn't complain on that bit of pollution]. He's still in jail. Trump needs to get involved on that injustice here.
Dear Anon 1215
"SOCIALIST NOAM CHOMSKY SAYS GOP IS MORE DANGEROUS THAN ISIS, KIM JONG UN"
Let me connect the dots for you. We have these dangerous people out there like Qasim al-Raymi (or al-Rimi) and Khalid Saeed al-Batarfi. Moist of us can agree on that although some libtard would strenuously object. People like Senate candidate Sinema, who if not in January, someday will represent some people in the US in an official capacity?
Are you with me so far?
Aside from trying to tie one hand behind the back of every soldier or prosecute them at the drop of a dime, the Left/Liberals/Democrats will fight conservative, the GOP or libertarians every step of the way so that hopefully in their minds nothing gets done. When the do win, they want to wind down the the wars against jihadis as soon as possible without winning.
If the Democrats are strong enough, we will lose the war.
So I do not think it is sidetracking things to ask if the Taliban, ISIS, Muslim Brotherhood or whatever the flavor is this week would allow you average liberal female to wear a vulva scarf or a pussy hat?
The jihjadis could win in the next 20 years, so the question is not moot and the hand that the Democrats have in making that happen is apparent.
Now what part or parts do you disagree with?
Surely you are not going to argue with Chomsky. You know how many Democrats support him>?? Lots.
Besides I can find similar comments by other Democrats such as Sinema and others.
https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/Put+up+or+shut+up!
Remember BS walks.
Silly at best. We begin by citing a rabble-rousing retired guy, Noam Chomsky...and then he stands for the entire Democratic Party...and then by extension, the millions of Democratic voters in our nation...stupid and childish but very typical
POS that he was, Chomsky still had a better career than you. Hew was also wrong. It must rankle you.
Chomsky is just one example of many.
Post a Comment