I am all alone (poor me) in the White House waiting for the Democrats to come back and make a deal on desperately needed Border Security. At some point the Democrats not wanting to make a deal will cost our Country more money than the Border Wall we are all talking about. Crazy!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 24, 2018
Deadline: Donald Trump Tweets: “I Am All Alone (Poor Me) In White House” On Christmas Eve
In an effort to spread holiday cheer and joy into the lives of America, Donald Trump has fired off another tweet to let us know he is hard at work in the White House on Christmas Eve. More specifically, he tweeted about his wall, how it is already being built, and how his magical wall is going to save lives.
“I am in the Oval Office & just gave out a 115 mile long contract for another large section of the Wall in Texas,” he wrote. “We are already building and renovating many miles of Wall, some complete. Democrats must end Shutdown and finish funding. Billions of Dollars, & lives, will be saved!”
Read more ....
WNU Editor: He is not alone this Christmas Eve.
41 comments:
Considering how to defeat Obama's JV team, ISIS?
New year and time for deplorable to get over Obama and note what our former alleys think what the market thinks and now what voters think
The other anon was just making the point that ISIS came to existence under Obama. Remember how they burned and beheaded people alive and sent this around the world? That was under Obama. So shove your deplorable talk up your ***
Right he invented them you moron
Trump supports Assad Putin turkey and is now in major meltdown
Ho Ho ho
Anon
ISIS ultimately is a by-product of an illegal and criminal war courtesy of G W Bush. He is the one responsible for all the subsequent commutations and permutations. Give credit, or, alternatively blame where it belongs.
Obama didn't help but and had to deal with a very hot potato but, it is on the shrub and ultimately of course, the American people.
Merry Christmas to all here who celebrate it.
"...it is ultimately on the shrub and of course the American people." While you clearly seem to think the American people are the most evil ever and would likely celebrate our death and destruction. God I pray your dream never comes true!!
Now as painful as it is, there is some truth to what you wrote. Americans are a hurtung people. Many of us are sick, hungry, barely have adequate clothing and shelter, and few us will ever have the lifestyle most westerners and Canadians take for granted. As such, we can't possibly fix the middle east.
You are correct that this started with GW Bush and some questionable decision making. Barack Obama inherited a hot potato. Trump inherited an even hotter potato.
Now Trump is working to solve the problem. Now that ISIS has been essentially defeated we get out preserving a modicum of dignity and strength. As part of negotiations that have been underway for many months 1.)the Saudis, Jordanians and the Israelis working in concert with Russia will curtail Iranian actions in Syria, 2.)Saudi and UAE forces will back up the Kurds making their position better than it has ever been. 3.)As there is no longer any value in supporting ISIS along with much downside risks in doing so, Turkey finishes off ISIS. Failure ti act in this manner is precarious for the survival of the Turkish government because other partners in this have interests that run contrary to ISIS. Essentially what's left of ISIS is surrounded by enemies.
Problem solved. As to who we want to "give credit" to, frankly I don't care who gets credit. My chief concerns are 1.)American national security, 2.)security for Isrsel and the Kurds whom I care deeply about, and 3.)the defeat of ISIS. The basic outline of the plan as linked to by the editor a few days ago that has been months in the making should result in vast improvements in all of these areas.
Perhaps everyone in this should get "credit." Perhaps we need to holdoff on the impkemtation to assign "credit," This does afford us the best opportunity we've had in years!! I pray American and "western" leaders don't blow this.
French leadership has already blasted president Trump over this. In the past, the US has often deferred to France. I don't think Trump will make the same mistakes but I do expect some US leaders to try and undermine him. They just can't get out of their own way sometimes!! Trump and the others in the neighborhood have orivided the blueprint and the months of careful planning to make this happen. Now US and ither "western" leaders optimally should work with them to implement it.
This has a reasonable chance of success. Continuing the old policies has a zero percent chance of success. As such, it's a no brainer.
Merry Christmas to all!!
”I retired from banking after 32 years. “ - Bob Huntley
October 21, 2015 at 1:11 PM
“By the way I spent my life working as a machinist in an elevator factory. Imagine this if you can…” - Bob Huntley
September 23, 2018 at 12:43 PM
http://warnewsupdates.blogspot.com/2015/10/a-look-at-russias-rules-of-engagement.html
http://warnewsupdates.blogspot.com/2018/09/us-national-security-adviser-john.html
Anon
Тебя надо казнить, больной ублюдок.
October 27, 2018 at 8:06 PM
Translation of what Bob Huntley posted:
“You must be executed, sick bastard.”
http://warnewsupdates.blogspot.com/2018/10/chinese-president-xi-tells-military.html
11 April 1991: Armistice is signed between the Coalition and Iraqi Army.
31 October 1998: Iraq ends its co-operation with the United Nations Special Commission.
" Iraqi military helicopters and planes regularly contested the no-fly zones."
An armistice was signed not a peace treaty. Iraq violated it. Thus a resumption of hostilities. Pretty simple to understand except by an unAmerican shill.
You have to be a troll. No one can be that dumb
Yeah bob ain't too bright. Not everything is Bush's fault. ISIS was created when Obama pulled out too early. But what do we know. The great Bob knows better lol
Comrade. .please stop with the obvious reverse psychology when you talk about Americans. And don't refer to yourself as westerner. You're no westerner nor American. It's getting old
How a Texas Fugitive Used a Dead Infant's Identity for Decades – and Finally Faced Justice
Ghosting (identity theft)
1) Ghosting is done in real life. Why not online?
2) What is it to steal? Politicians try to turn positive public opinion into votes for them, which if enough are gathered means elected office and political power.
Foreign actors might do the same.
If a person had no web presence they would be look a stillborn. Or a person might have a large web presence, but in certain circles and not others.
Or these people could be true red and steeped in everything anti-American or anti-Western.
Anon (2:29PM),
Actually you're getting old. I've already told you who I am and where you xan find me. I am an American. Some of us are circumspect about war and wish to avoid conflicts we don't really need. An example would be Senator Rand Paul. Other examples would be some of our nation's founding fathers. You can also find numerous writings on the Internet written by Americans that expound upon this. It doesn't mean we aren't Americans. It just neans we have disagreements with the direction of our nation's foreign policy.
Frankly I'm not sure if you are an unserious person. Perhaps knowing your positions are weak you need to insult me to try and feel better about yourself and not have to face up to this fact. Maybe you need a safe space, an echo chamber of sorts where you can go. I'll let you try and determine that.
For serious discussions about anything on this site, I'm all eyes and time permitting I will respond on this website in the thread you post it on. For inquiries not related to this website, contact me through my company website.
"Actually you're getting old."
& U R not?
"Frankly I'm not sure if you are an unserious person."
You wanted
(1) I'm not sure if you are an serious person.
or
(2) I think you may be an unserious person.
For that grammatical error will your pay be docked or will you now be staying in Lubyanka?
"Perhaps knowing your positions are weak you need to insult me "
Insult you? No. I believe you may be a troll.
Poster
I could discuss your entire post but, not tonight.
Just in part:
"we get out preserving a modicum of dignity and strength" More important than preserving our dignity and strength" is to establish credibility and integrity. That can be accomplished through a few actions.
1. Admit responsibility for having committed war crimes and crimes against humanity and vow never to do so again, mean it and act on it.
2. Apologize to the countries and people around the world for having interfered in their lives and in many cases ending lives.
3. Establish a program of making restitution to those wronged countries/people and that may include opening the borders to allow millions, perhaps tens of millions of people into America.
4. Transfer the money wasted on the military to the needs at home and in the process the government can maybe find a way to help its own people regain some honest pride.
Bob,
Is your 4 step program to be done before or after you threaten people with execution?
_________________________
Anon
Тебя надо казнить, больной ублюдок.
October 27, 2018 at 8:06 PM
Translation of what Bob Huntley posted:
“You must be executed, sick bastard.”
http://warnewsupdates.blogspot.com/2018/10/chinese-president-xi-tells-military.html
December 25, 2018 at 1:13 PM
Anon
Trust a sick criminal war supporter to introduce "execution" into a simple program of establishing some small measure of credibility and integrity into a country's relationship with mankind.
Bob,
Points 1 and 2: I'm not sure we're guilty as you charge us. The other parties involved may have some culpability for things that have happened that will need to be factored in. Each case needs to be evaluated individually. We would also need to ensure some way to ensure fair trials. Should we be owed restitution how does America collect? An example is Iran which I think we've duscussed before.
Point 3: Once equitable judgements are rendered, getting restitution in some form from America isn't likely to be an issue for another party. Should America be owed restitution how do we collect? There really doesn't seem to be any mechanisms in place to ensure America gets fair trials or any way for America to collect any restitution that might be owed to us for wrongs done to us. I also don't see how it's possible for us to be able to accept millions or tens of millions of people at this time. We simply don't have the resources to accommodate this.
Point 4: I'm pretty sure we can spend less on the military. I don't materially disagree with the notion that our foregin policy needs adjusting. Our military needs to be used to defend us, not to carry out the interests of other countries.
With the defeat of ISIS in Syria we will be getting out of Syria. Trump campaigned on this sort of thing. If he succeeds, Syria is only the beginning. Significant draw downs in troops are in the works for Afghanistan. Sometime toward the end of Trump's first term or early in his second term I'd expect to see a significant draw down in troops in South Korea as that war is ended. Ending this conflict will help defuse tensions with China. The ultimate prize will be ending Cold War 2 with Russia.
We should pray Trump and his team succeed. As I see it, the biggest hindrance to achieving this is the unscrupulous elements who are trying to remove Trump from office. If we want the desired changes, Trump represents the best opportunity.
You seem to really have a deep seated hatred for us. I do hope most Canadians don't hate us as you seem to. Americans generally look up to and admire Canada.
Anon (7:55PM),
Sorry about the grammatical errors. It's been a busy day wnd I was distracted. Thanks for pointing it out.
As I don't get paid for this, my pay for this can't be docked.
An Internet troll is generally someone who starts quarrels or upsets people to distract and sow discord by posting inflammatory or off topic messages according to wikipedia. I'm very polite and take care to try not to offend people. While my grammar is sometimes off due to the combination of poor eyesight and multi-tasking, I stay on topic. As such, I wouldn't meet the definition of a "troll" unless perhaps someone is looking for an echo chamber or a safe space.
"Trust a sick criminal war supporter to introduce "execution" in"
Trust an internet troll to say someone should be executed and then to not own up to it.
Between forensic computer science, screen prints, your own actions, and way back machines, you are pretty much screwed.
Poster
Forget fair trials. It is really quite simple. As a nation admit the guilt, stop doing bad stuff, and at least attempt to make some restitution. Otherwise the people in all the other countries will eventually find a way to visit some of the terror they have experienced on Americans at home, and in a very big way.
Iran owes the US nothing. Go back to the 1950s when the CIA got the ball rolling. Everything since is repercussion.
"defend us"? Against retaliation for wrongdoings. Stop the wrong doings and how much defense do you think you will need?
Yes and with ISIS defeated the people removed from Syria will likely go to Africa. The game goes on and on.
If you cannot take valid criticism of wrongdoings you are blind or willfully blind. Perhaps being a resident of the US you may feel that is the only posture possible or else you will experience retaliation.
I have no hatred for the US or Americans and sorry, but speaking out the truth does not count as hatred. Such accusations are generally the final resort of the guilty who have no valid counter arguments.
Often the truth hurts but denying the truth, when it is so obvious is wrong and evil and until Americans en masse find a way to force their government to
become humane, not only to the people in the rest of the world by to its own citizens the problems and the crimes will never go away.
What I do have is a strong dislike for people who kill innocents, women and children, all the while preaching better things most of which does not even exist at home.
The US has reached the point where it is no longer, or soon to be no longer, the major power in the world. It is morally and financially bankrupt and unable to even properly look after it own people. Heck even mother nature is rapidly closing in.
Imagine how low a country with all the potential of the US has sunk when that it feels so threatened by the existence of a 7 year old girl that it found it necessary to send in a crack team of Navy Seals to kill that a 7 year old girl.
Look at the history of the country since 1776, both within and without, relative to wars and what you see is absolute inhumanity.
Sorry for the rant but I have to say that a lot of my feelings, based on study and observation, have been confirmed over and over again by Americans, even vets, on numerous other sites.
Count every vote the Democrats say.
But Mossadegh do not.
Bob,
No need to apologize for your "rant." It is your opinion and you are entitled. I do hope that most other Canadians are far more circumspect in their judgements.
Very respectfully the "rant" could have been easily written by America's endmies. It's as though you copied it verbatim. Having a slick messaging machine does not automatically one right.
We are going to need a fair system to hear all of the evidence and consider all of the context. In the case of Iran, "Iran owes the US nothing..." so says Iran's handpicked representatives in the international bodies and the Iranian messaging machine. Having a slick messaging machine does NOT one automatically right.
Just to vote the 1950s Iran example, a number of sources have suggested that reports of US involvement were overblown or were justified. As part of the tribunal, this would be considered carefully. I've already explained why that can't happen now.
Poster
Circumspect as in beat around the bush has no place in an open discussion. We are not silver tongued politicians and if you have information that refutes what I say, don't beat around the bush, just say it and provide the links.
You might be interested in this link regarding the events in Iran in 1953. If you feel it is untrue you and or I try to find a link to the actual CIA release. I am too tired right now and will be busy for a couple of days.
https://www.cnn.com/2013/08/19/politics/cia-iran-1953-coup/
Just imagine if say Trump (could be anybody who becomes President) managed to create a dictatorship with the help of a powerful foreign country, mirroring what happened in Iran during which time, say 40 years the people, the Americans, became impoverished and strictly controlled. Then one day the people rose up and took their country back and in the process kicked the visages of that foreign country out.
In your mind/heart, does that foreign country then have the right to attack and harass America in an attempt to re-establish the control it had enjoyed from supporting the dictator for so long?
Poor thang is quoting the communist news network.
Leftist B refuses to acknowledge that the Shah could dismiss the PM at any time. We all know that if the Shah had dismissed Mossadegh, he would have illegally held on.
We also know that Mossadegh illegal called the election. That is is stopped counting votes, when it suited him.
In parting I will say that Bob does not beat around the bush. He is bold and unashamedly tells 1/2 truths and outright lies.
Bob,
There's nothing of value in your link. Nothing new can be learned. Every American school child knows the standard narrative provided in the link by heart. In your case, the link is used as part of the echo chamber.
A cursory internet search via Google will reveal a substantial body of reasons to be skeptical of the standard narrative as you have presented. You may need to know how to refine your searches There are things Google doesn't want us to find!! I've been doing it for years. It's second nature to me. For others it may not be.
You want to "just imagine." I typically don't do that preferring to deal in known facts of analysis based upon information at hand. Nevertheless "imagine" you've had valuable assets that you legally own confiscated (stolen from you) by a foreign government without compensation. Furthermore the terms of the contract have already been renegotiated several times improving the deal each time for the third. Since you're "imagining" take it from there. See how the imaginary scenario develops.
I'm not going to try the case here and since it appears you hate us I don't think you're interested anyway even if we could try it. The term "feeding the troll" comes to mind. I may have fed you to much!!
What anon 948 seems to be suggesting has a substantial body of evidence to support it. The entire Mossadegh edifice may well have been a rotten one that not only needed to fall over and be removed but would've been no matter what America or Britain did.
"facts of analysis" should read "facts and analysis."
"improving the deal each time for the third" should read "improving the deal each time for the thief."
Poster
Your comments on these links would be appreciated.
https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/csi-studies/studies/vol48no2/article10.html
https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB435/
Bob,
You are deflecting again about the Iranian constitution and the illegal election.
It was illegal because fruit loops did not count all the votes. He counted just the ones he wanted, from the cities.
Try again Leftist twerp.
Anon
I certainly have to give it to you. If nothing else, an American, if in fact to are such, would certainly know about illegal and fruit loop elections, especially so given the latest election.
The point you have sorely missed is that irrespective of the legality, or, otherwise of an election in another country, the US has no business interfering in the governing of that country. Doing so is a criminal act.
Talk about deflection. You haven't a clue what that is, or at least it appears so. I suspect that for whatever reason you might conjure up you are just a liar.
Bob,
Again you deflect.
The election was illegal. Mossadegh made it so.
Bob,
Certainly if a substantial extra block of time somehow materializes I will review the links and offer comment. Frankly even if time does permit I'm extremely skeptical that it would be a productive use of my time. Based upon my prior experience with you on this thread and this website I suspect the links you provided will supply little to nothing more than a rehashing of the standard narrative that every school child is aware of. In other words, they are unlikely to provide any new information or analysis that every American school child doesn't already know by heart and has seen so many times they'd find the same old rehashing boring.
I noticed that one of the links appears to be from the CIA. There is evidence that suggests the CIA overstated its role in this perhaps to procure additional funding. Google searches can be conducted on this. Any proper investigation would have to consider this. Additionally many years of experience has taught me and many Americans to be skeptical of anything US Intelligence tells us.
As the necessary time is unlikely to materialize, this will probably be my final comment on this thread. I will expound upon the last two comments by anon. Not only is there solid evidence that Mossadegh tried to rig an election he would have lost and would have been removed from office no matter what the British or the Americans did but valuable assets legally owned by the British due to agreements negotiated in good faith were confiscated without compensation by the Mossadegh government. Furthermore this government made no real attempts to negotiate on an agreement that had already been modified to their benefit before.
Poster
Well for sure it is your choice as to whether you want to educate yourself, or not, and believe, or not, whatever suits you.
You have given yourself away with the statement " that every school child is aware of".
It is well known that the American child in school is not in any way taught anything that resembles critical thinking and therefore has no need for detail regarding the country's illegal warring and general interference into the workings of other countries.
Say, when they got to the Vietnam war in your class how much time was devoted to minutia like fragging, or did they even mention that particular tidbit of important information.
Bob,
You are one ignorant SOB. There you go again with your superiority complex.
As you are so hung up on fragging and smug you might want to check this book out.
"Dirty Little Secrets of the Vietnam War: Military Information You're Not Supposed to Know"
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/38935.Dirty_Little_Secrets_of_the_Vietnam_War
Where was Bob the snowflake going with fragging. That the war was unpopular and so officers were fragged. God, but you are a fumbduck.
I did have a good laugh. Poster said he had no time to look at your link and then went on for 3 paragraphs. He is a vintage troll like you. The CIA link was the CIA blurb and link to a book published by someone. Either Poster could not be bothered to stop from trolling or he does not care. But why should he? You are a troll just like him.
Anon
If you thought I was trying to find out what fragging was you indeed are a mentally deficient snotgoblinscrotumscratcher.
I was trying to educate you as to the cause of fragging and who was doing it, but you are beyond redemption. You literally cannot learn anything new if it conflicts with you mindset.
Anon
I can't believe your last post you obviously didn't either read mine or understand some basic English. This is absolutely a new level in stupidity for you and here I thought you had some potential to acquire at least a modicum of intelligence.
...
Bob,
Thank you for the links. Even though time is limited you provided the links and asked for my comments on them.
As I always say, we need to make the effort to "find out" for ourselves about things doing our best to avoid confirmation bias.
I have been unable to make the CIA link work. If I have time, I will make more attempts. If as anon suggests it is a CIA blurb, (CIA plug) I'm skeptical. If the CIA endorses a book, I'm also skeptical as well. Experience teaches it's prudent to be skeptical of US Intelligence but I will keep trying to access the article
The gwu.edu article contains a rehashing of information and narratives that are known by all. The sources cites are 35 documents of which 21 come from the CIA and 14 from the British. In my opinion, this entire article is way to kind to Mossadegh and the Iranians. To me it seems it is taboo in mainstream sources to criticize Mossadegh or the Iranians. Also, some reporting has suggested the CIA role gas been,overstated. These sources and others would need to followed up on to reach a definitive conclusion. In summary, I think the editor Mr. Byrne and those who assisted him, "cherry picked" their data to arrive at the conclusion they wanted.
Anon,
I'm glad I could give you a laugh. At least I think I am.:-) As far as the "troll" comment, with my reply to Bob you may have actually been correct. It was poorly articulated.
As far as having trouble learning things that conflict with our mindset, I suspect we are all vulnerable to this. I call this ideology and I think we need to be constantly working to challenge our mindsets.
Faith-based thinking vs. evidence-based thinking. People who are faith-based believe what they WANT to believe. They reject evidence contrary to their belief as a MATTER OF FAITH.
You defined yourself Bob to a T.
Post a Comment