Monday, January 21, 2019

Military And Intelligence News Briefs -- January 21, 2019


Pavel Felgenhauer, RCD/Eurasia Daily Monitor: A Renewed Nuclear Arms Race Between Russia and U.S.

A last-ditch attempt by Russia and the United States to salvage the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty at a consultation meeting in Geneva, Switzerland, on January 15, ended in mutual acrimony. Washington has accused Moscow of deploying a modified Iskander land-mobile missile launcher fitted with a 9М729 (NATO designation: SSC-8) long-range cruise missile, in blatant violation of the INF. Moscow has adamantly denied any wrongdoing, since the 9М729 allegedly has not been test-fired at ranges longer than 500 kilometers. In turn, Russia has lobbed multiple accusations at the United States: First, the U.S. has allegedly been violating the INF by using dummy rockets with properties similar to Iranian or Korean middle-range missiles to test its ballistic missile defense (BMD) interceptors. Second, the U.S. has been deploying long-range attack drones, which, the Russians argue, should be classified as “missiles” under the treaty. And third, it has been building batteries of SM-3 Aegis Ashore BMD interceptors in Poland and Romania using standard МK-41 launch tubes; on U.S. warships, the MK-41 tubes are also used to launch different types of offensive projectiles, including Tomahawk cruise missiles (see EDM, December 6, 2018).

Read more ....

Military And Intelligence News Briefs -- January 21, 2019

Moscow Calls New Pentagon Report 'Relaunch of Reagan-Era Star Wars Programme' -- Sputnik

US says Russia must destroy missile system -- The Hill

US calls on Russia to destroy new missile system -- NBC/Reuters

Trump's missile defense plan faces reality check -- The Hill

The military is looking at ways to intercept nukes from space — but experts say it’s not feasible -- Loren Grush, The Verge

DARPA Builds Advanced Interceptor Weapon to Destroy Hypersonic Missile Attacks -- Warrior Maven

Airbus Receives DARPA Blackjack Contract -- Air Force Magazine

Marines Want Missiles To Sink Ships From Shores, And They Want Them Fast -- Breaking Defense

The U.S. Navy's Second Fleet Is Becoming Operational -- Navy Times

Navy Secretary Says Change Needed in Wake of Audit -- National Defense

Trump still poised for a drawdown in Afghanistan after the deadliest year for US troops since 2014 -- Military Times

Trump Travels To Dover Air Base To Honor 4 Americans Who Died In Syria -- Task & Purpose/Reuters

That WSJ 'Women In Combat' Op-Ed Is A Complete Disaster — But It Still Presents A Threat -- Kate Germano, Task & Purpose

Missile Defense Plan: U.S. Unprotected From Russian Nuclear Attack -- Loren Thompson, Forbes

U.S. Could Ask Australia to Host Nuclear Missiles -- Hugh White, RCD/The Strategist

Spy satellite launched after repeated delays -- UPI

Ex-US envoy in ISIS fight: 'There's no plan for what's coming' after US troop withdrawal in Syria -- The Hill

Time to Use China's A2/AD Military Strategy Against Them -- James Holmes, National Interest

The Chinese Trojan Horse in American Universities -- Michael Krull, American Military News

Aircraft Carriers, Stealth Bombers and Nuclear Weapons: How China's Military Is Rising -- Sebastien Roblin, National Interest

Russia to supply seven Mi-35, three Mi-17 helicopters to Serbia -- TASS

Russian Navy escorts US destroyers that entered Baltic Sea -- TASS

Russian Navy Monitoring US Destroyer in Black Sea – Control Center -- Sputnik

Japan Intercepts 2 Russian Nuclear-Capable Fighter-Bombers -- The Diplomat

Norway Beefs Up Arctic Defences at Russia's Doorstep -- Sputnik

German Gov't Faces Suit for Banning Arms Export to Saudi Arabia – Reports -- Sputnik

Report finds another undisclosed North Korea missile site, says there are 19 more -- NBC

North Korea’s bio weapons ‘more of a threat than nuclear arsenal’ -- The Telegraph

Singapore wants the F-35 to replace its F-16s -- Defense News

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

About the INF withdrawal, the Russians are being cynical on it. They withdrew and deployed theater nuclear weapons without the curtesy of a withdrawal notice. Second Germany is on record opposing a counter system on Germany soil. Russia know NATO doesn’t have the willpower to counter. So a nice win for Putin and go back and read why NATO deployed the Pershings in the 1980s, as the same compelling reasons still exist. Bad news for NATO. Add in Germany and Frances joining forces to deploy a EU military, a project Putin publicly applauded, he is having his way with Europe.