Business Insider: Iran Announced Its Second Nuclear Deal Violation In A Week, And Said It Could Begin Making Weapons-Grade Uranium Immediately
* Iran has announced its second violation in a week of the Obama-era Iran nuclear deal.
* The Iranian government announced Sunday, the end of a 60-day deadline given to the deal's remaining signatories, that it has begun enriching uranium above the 3.67% purity threshold set forth in the nuclear agreement.
* On Monday, Iran announced that its stockpile of low-enriched uranium had grown beyond the 300 kg limit set in the nuclear deal. The country also said it would start enriching uranium at weapons-grade levels on July 7.
Iran announced its second violation in a week of the landmark deal meant to slow the country's march to a nuclear bomb.
Iranian officials announced Sunday that Iran has increased uranium enrichment beyond the purity limits set in the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), an accord commonly known as the Iran nuclear deal, CNN reported.
Iranian government spokesperson Ali Rabiei said that his country has started enriching uranium above a concentration of 3.67%, the agreed upon threshold. Low-enriched uranium at that level is suitable for powering nuclear reactors, but it is far from weapons grade.
Read more ....
WNU Editor: Iran is saying that these measures are reversible if sanctions are removed .... Iran says its measures to reduce commitment to nuclear deal 'reversible' (Reuters).
More News On Iran Announcing That It Will Breach Nuclear Enrichment Levels
Iran to raise uranium enrichment beyond nuclear deal limits -- AP
Iran ratchets up nuclear tensions with enrichment plan -- Reuters
Iran nuclear deal: Government announces enrichment breach -- BBC
Iran announces it will exceed uranium enrichment cap in latest breach of nuclear deal -- France 24
Iran breaks nuclear deal enrichment targets for second time -- The Guardian
Iran Announces New Breach of Nuclear Deal Limits, and Threatens Further Violations -- The New York Times
Iran announces second breach of 2015 nuclear deal -- DW
Iran to breach uranium enrichment limits set by landmark nuclear deal -- CNN
Iran set to exceed uranium enrichment limit in 2015 nuclear deal -- Al Jazeera
34 comments:
Bill Clinton's Billionaire Friend Jeffrey Epstein Arrested for Sex Trafficking Minors
Super wealthy people have many friends...Trump?how many lawsuits now in the courts against that pussy grabber? 20+
stupido is as stupido posts
Yes, Trump went to0 the same billionaire parties as Epstein and many other New Yorkers.
But Clinton,
Hoooooo Boy!
Clinton had many trips to Orgy Island and in which he ditched his secret service protection.
Can you say sweating!
Clinton will end up registering as a pedo.
Democrat Family Values.
$2.5 Million Taken From National Parks for Trump's Bombastic 4th of July Display
Donald Trump on witness list for civil case involving billionaire paedophile Jeffrey Epstein | The Independent
Biographer Tweets Embarrassing Trump Quote About Jeffrey Epstein And Younger Women
Fantastic, keep calling names.
There you have it, the latest news from secret squirrel land!
SEX PERVERT EPSTEIN AND CLOSE ASSOCIATES
Alright squirrel, don't stop.
I know you are but what am I?
ps:The form alright is a one-word spelling of the phrase all right. Alright is commonly used in written dialogue and informal writing, but all right is the only acceptable form in edited writing. Basically, it is not all right to use alright in standard English.
Secret squirrel renders his decision.
"but what am I?" By now Lapides that should be obvious even to you.
Younger women for a 40 something can mean 18 to 35 years of age.
So you got exactly nothing with Trump's quote.
If Trump heard through the grapevine that Democrat Epstein was going pedo, where is he going to go with heresay? The police?
With Bill Clinton we have evidence. He went on several trips to the Bahamas on Epstein's private plane, the Lolita Express.
DEMOCRATS GOING TO JAIL!
First Bill, then Hillary.
"Many Dems have been in denial about the Clinton angle for years. Maxwell attended Chelsea's wedding after Epstein was publicly outed. We have many more questions than answers at this point."
-Bertrand Gilfoyle @bert_gilfoyle
So pedo Epstein went to Chelsea's wedding.
Sound like the Clintons & other Democrats were and are very close to the pedophiliac.
Ghislaine Maxwell was Epstein's procurer/pimnp.
Birds of a feather...
"According to Giuffre, Epstein actually wired his mansion, where he often received his friends and other guests, with cameras. He then secretly recorded orgies they had with underage girls, after which he blackmailed them. Or so Giuffre says."
So we will see Bill Clinton performing on pay per view?
SUCKS to be a DEMOCRAT
"And that's got to be a house-on-fire crisis for Democrats, too. It sounds like all kinds of Democrats are going to be found in Epstein's little black book of clients, not just Bill Clinton.
President Trump, by contrast, banned the pervert from his Mar-a-Lago club years ago. So much for pinning the scandal on Trump as Democrats had hoped"
No interest in justice or even right and wrong. It’s just the vain hope that someone from the opposing political side will get screwed.
THAT IS JUST YOU MUDDYING THE WATERS, TRYING TO PAINT EVERYONE WITH THE SAME BRUSH NOW THAT YOU ARE LOSING AND LOSING BIG.
"On July 14, 1983, the House Ethics Committee recommended that Rep. Dan Crane (R-IL) and Rep. Gerry Studds (D-MA) be reprimanded for having engaged in sexual relationships with minors, specifically 17-year-old congressional pages."
So what happened?
The Democrat voters put the pedo Democrat back in office.
The Republican voters nuked the pedo Republican.
See the difference?
Of course not.
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/harry-kazianis-iran-and-america-are-headed-for-a-showdown-and-no-its-not-trumps-fault
anon: Trump now has twenty (20) cases in the courts about sexual misconduct...so find a case here or there but the fact remains, for each Dem you can find in the sex badness category, there is a GOP member, and usually with young boys rather than those of the opposite sex
I can think of 3
Gerry Studds (d)
Mark Foley (R)
Larry Craig (R)
There is no statistical difference between the 2 parties in that regard.
Sarah Palin had numerous cases against her. None of them stuck. They were harassment cases like the lawsuit saying she did not have a Juneteenth announcement.
Keep pushing. The Stormy Daniels/Avenatti scandal sure turned into a big scandal for the Democrats.
What are Demoncraps always telling us? It is okay if it is 2 adults and it is consensual. Well, at worst Stormy Daniels was paid, which given Demoncrat family values should be okay. New York state is trying to legalize prostitution after all.
Some one who spends 2/3rds their life as a confirmed bachelor is very suspicious.
Lapides,
You say there are 20 sexual misconduct cases against Trump currently being adjudicated, name them.
7:17
https://www.businessinsider.com/women-accused-trump-sexual-misconduct-list-2017-12#alva-johnson-20
Here is a list.
- They are very, very stale charges.
- After the Steele Dossier, if the liberals are willing to do that, they are willing to do anything like put some women up to this.
- you could no prosecute one of these allegations in a court of law.
I agree. I did want Lapides to recite them since it was him who made the statement and it's incumbent upon him to back up his statements with evidence, something he has much difficulty doing.
a quote from Donald Trump praising the billionaire's fondness for young women has re-surfaced.
Trump biographer Tim O'Brien tweeted the quote from a 2002 profile of Epstein, in which Trump says "I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy. He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side."
Trump's association with Epstein extends into allegations that women were lured directly into sex trafficking from Mar-A-Lago.
Name the twenty cases you claim Lapides.
Young women could mean 16 to 35. Or in your case a 70 year old.
It could mean that Trump has heard the rumors and is giving Epstein a left handed compliment and warning people off from associating with him. He could say out right that Epstein is a pedo in public, but as a rich an with money to lose saying something like that about a rich man able to hire lawyers is risky. So he infers and let a discerning audience knows.
We know about Gore. the charges were made within a year or two. They were not stale charges. You voted for the guy. We know about Clinton. the charges were not stale. You voted for him (& her).
You have a lot to answer for.
That's clinto s support base are morons?
Note
I put up links. Read them. Ignore them. Not my problem. Do not ask me to suppy evidence and this and that when all you do is insult, call names, and post bullshit from years ago rather than confront the present.
Here, for example: IRANIAN NUKE DEVELOPMENT PLACE, PROTECTED BY NEW MISSLES WANT ME TO GO THERE AND SEE WHAT THEY USE FOR LUNCH FACILITIES?
TIP: IF ALL YOU CAN DO IS HARK BACK TO THE PAST TO AVOID OR DEFLECT UPON THE PRESENT, YOU ARE A SAD LOT AND SENSIBLE FOLKS LAUGH AT YOU. YOU WILL NOT CHANGE. THAT IS IN YOUR BACKGROUND. SO CARRY ON. HO HO HO
AND here is all we know or have to know at this time about famous people associated or friendly with Epstein. And yes, Trump and Clinton are noted.
You made the statement, you name the cases Lapides.
You made the statement, you name the cases Lapides.
If Trump banned someone from his club because they had committed a crime, such as child molestation, and because he witnessed it, or, had sufficient evidence of it, enough to ban a very wealthy person, then it is likely he committed a crime in not reporting it to the police. Accordingly, he could be charged as an accessory, at minimum a facilitator.
The facts are not really known although Trump's actions in banning Epstein suggest he knew and it would have had to be something very serious.
Trumps nefarious personality, historically speaking, suggests that it would take a really serious issue, something as bad as child molestation, to refuse entry to his hotel, something that would cost dearly in accomomdation and sundry charges.
I expect that Trump also has video proof he can hold over Epstein's head to ward off retaliation. No doubt some people have been paid off to stay silent as well.
"Accordingly, he could be charged as an accessory, at minimum a facilitator."
So send it to the DA's office. You have a phone and a pen. Do something.
You can get banned from a business,where a case might be problematic of impossible to prosecute. Trump could have heard about it 3rd person. He bans the person, other people have already have reported, and the police sat on it.
What do you want him to do Bob? Go vigilante?
People get banned from Walmart all the time, but they are never prosecuted. See how that works?
"If Trump banned someone from his club because they had committed a crime"
Epstein probably lured the the girl to a secluded place. Or he propositioned her. It is the girls word versus Epstein's word unless there is a rape kit. Trump can;t make the girl submit to a hospital examination. Who know that don't you.
From a liability point of View Trump would ban him although he has little to go on. If Trump knew, then her parents probably knew and they decided not to press charges, because the case was weak.
Epstein did not contest the ban as slander, because it would shine light upon him.
Post a Comment