Tuesday, October 8, 2019

84% Of Women Failed U.S. Army Combat Fitness Test

Second Lt. Kelly Derienzo, 1st Battalion, 30th Field Artillery, works out Jan. 9 during her final days in Fort Sill's Pre-Ranger Program. She is one of the first women allowed into Fort Benning's Ranger Assessment and Selection Program in hopes of earning a spot in Ranger School. (Photo Credit: Ms. Marie Berberea (TRADOC))

Clearance Jobs: Army Combat Fitness Test Fiasco! Slides Reveal 84% of Women Failing ACFT

In previous articles for ClearanceJobs, I’ve thrown rocks at the Army’s catastrophically ill-considered Army Combat Fitness Test—the planned successor to the proven and successful Army Physical Fitness Test. I will admit, however, that my arguments against it emerged strictly from experience and logic. I am a fan of the original APFT because I watched soldiers in my platoon take the challenge to raise their scores, and watched pounds melt away and recruiting poster paratroopers emerge. As for logic, the APFT essentially costs a unit ten bucks and two hours to run through an entire company of soldiers, whereas the ACFT costs… more. Tens of millions of dollars more.

Read more ....

WNU editor: The comments posted in the above story tells me that the debate on women serving in the military is still ongoing.

4 comments:

Caecus said...

Using women as soldiers is lunacy, typical of post modernity

Roger Smith said...


For combat it is absurd.

obama feel good stuff that doesn't work. Wheeeeeeeeeeee! Look at that tooth fairy.

Anonymous said...

84% failed? That's RACISM AND SEXISM to say that!!!!!! You should be canceled and banned from earth you Nazi!!

*foam in front of mouth and screaming* -most Democrats today

Anonymous said...

No worries. This is all to ensure we kill each other lots and good one day. It will be a slaughter. Can't you feel it?