Russia troop and hardware stand in formation during Vostok-2018 (East-2018) military drills. © Sputnik / Vadim Savitskii
US News and World Report: How Russia Improved its Military With An Economy the Size of Spain
The Russians spend the highest share of their military budget on procurement and build much of the equipment in-house.
After a decade of heavy investment in modernizing its military, Russia, a country with an economy similar in size to Spain, now has an updated army, navy and air force that fuel President Vladimir Putin's ambitions of keeping the country's superpower status. The upgrade has been possible, experts say, by boosting in-house production levels of weapons and equipment, and choosing to spend a larger share of the budget on acquisitions.
The Russian military received increased funding beginning in 2011, which improved pay for employees, allowed for the purchasing of high quantities of new and more sophisticated equipment, and supported more training and exercises.
Although the country spends significantly less in absolute figures than what the United States, China, Saudi Arabia, India or France each put into their military, in relative numbers Moscow spends a higher share of its defense budget for acquiring new or modernized equipment and weaponry.
Read more ....
WNU Editor: Russia focuses its military spending on things that work. Would they spend over $1 trillion to develop a new F-35 fighter .... no. But the would spend a billion or two on how to shoot it down.
4 comments:
The USSR had such a large army and kept it that way after WW2. China has a huge population.
So the the thinking was America has to be qualitatively better if they are not numerically greater. There is some truth to it.
Bit this concept has been taken to a spiral deathtrap.
Aldo there is a such a clamor of butter over guns that the more 'tails' (airplane tails) seen, the more the peacenicks and other rabble get upset about cost and other things.
Further, if any Americans die in combat or the kill ratio is not immediately and wildly favorable then there will be criticism.
Also too many people cannot be bothered being militia. It is a NIMBY like attitude.
Then there are our allies like Germany and Canada that do a lot of cost shifting letting the US pick up the tab. It makes for a greater burden for the US.
What happens when the Europeans pick up the burden. The US is not there. France picked up the burden in the 1980s. France defeated Libya during the "Toyota Wars" with very little money. As a consequence the US did not have to be in that area.
Don't forget about all those loans to africa and the stealing of Venezuela 😁
My guess is also they are printing a lot of money and hiding their inflation issue
,,,
Post a Comment