The Hill: Global coronavirus death toll surpasses 300,000
The number of confirmed global deaths from the novel coronavirus on Wednesday surpassed 300,000, as health experts continue to warn that reopening parts of the world too quickly could cause a second wave of infections.
More than 4.4 million confirmed cases of COVID-19 have been reported worldwide and roughly 300,070 people have died from it, according to a Johns Hopkins University database. Health experts say that the death toll could be higher given a lack of transparency from China and other countries.
In the U.S., more than 1.4 million individuals have contracted the virus and nearly 85,000 people have died from it. The United Kingdom, Spain and Italy have all confirmed more than 200,000 cases of the virus and more than 25,000 deaths caused by it. The death toll in the U.K. sits at about 33,600, making it the highest reported death count outside of the U.S.
Read more ....
Update #1: Coronavirus Deaths Hit 300,000 Worldwide—Almost One-Third From The U.S. -- Forbes
Update #2: Coronavirus global death toll passes 300,000 as countries wait in lockdown -- CNN
WNU Editor: This disease is ravaging South America. Santiago has just gone into complete lock-down .... Total quarantine in Santiago de Chile after coronavirus spike (Santiago Times).
5 comments:
"It seems like every day we get some new scare tactic from some supposedly credible source. And what generally happens is after some reporting of what everybody would consider good news, in less than a day, a couple of stories come along, maybe three, that try to throw cold water on the good news and make it sound even worse than it was the day before — and that’s what this is.
“WHO Warns it Could Take up to Five Years Before the Coronavirus Pandemic Is Under Control.” This is just… It’s irresponsible the way this stuff is being reported, and the reason it’s being reported the way it is is because it’s all political now. Let’s review. The first objective was to what? Flatten the curve. And let me ask all of you a question."
By wearing a mask, the exhaled viruses will not be able to escape and will concentrate in the nasal passages, enter the olfactory nerves and travel into the brain.
Russell Blaylock, MD
www.technocracy.news/blaylock-face-masks-pose-serious-risks-to-the-healthy/
Los Angeles Mayor: Masks Required Now to 'Get More Freedoms'
https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/victoria-taft/2020/05/14/los-angeles-mayor-masks-required-now-to-get-more-freedoms-n391931
Who do I trust? Dr. Blaylock or Wanna-be Dip Garcetti?
Blaylock has science and liberals always harp about following the science. But Garcetti has impeccable liberal credentials!
Stanford Antibody Studies Indicate No Safe Option for Eradicating COVID-19, Including Lockdown
“I think in the back of people’s heads there is this idea that somehow we can eradicate this disease if we just stay locked down. That is not possible. The serologic evidence, even the MLB study, suggest this. It suggests the epidemic is too widespread to eradicate. It spreads via asymptomatic contact."
https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/stacey-lennox/2020/05/14/dr-bhattacharya-stanford-antibody-studies-indicate-no-safe-option-n390630
Meanwhile Democrats keep lying and clutching their pearls.
New Hydroxychloroquine Trial Could Be Destined to Fail
Using Hydroxychloroquine (an ionophore) without zinc is like a full back punching a hole through the defensive line in football, but there is no quarterback carrying the football behind him.
Fauci knows this. He is purposefully setting up a trial to fail. Politically at this point in time Fauci although mendacious prick cannot be fired.
www.ics.uci.edu/~jutts/110/Lecture17.pdf
Is Fauci such a useless prick that he cannot do a 2 factor design?
"He's a useless prick. Even they hate him."
Randomized Block Design
Two Factor ANOVA
Interaction in ANOVA
Does the prick know what a an interaction is?
deep state!
Post a Comment