The Gray Zone: Bombshell: Crowdstrike admits ‘no evidence’ Russia stole emails from DNC server
Crowdstrike, the firm behind the Russian email hacking allegation at the core of Russiagate, makes a bombshell admission: “We did not have concrete evidence.”
In newly released Congressional testimony, Crowdstrike president Shawn Henry said that “we did not have concrete evidence” that alleged Russian hackers actually took the emails from DNC servers. “There’s circumstantial evidence, but no evidence that they were actually exfiltrated,” Henry said.
Read more ....
Update #1: New House Documents Sow Further Doubt That Russia Hacked the DNC (Consortium News)
Update #2: CrowdStrike Had No Evidence of Russians Stealing Emails From DNC, Declassified Transcript Shows (Epoch Times)
WNU Editor: Aaron Maté (above video) is no supporter of President Trump. He is as progressive as you can get. But his reporting on a story that the main stream has chosen to ignore is spot-on. For three years we were told that Russia hacked the DNC servers and gave the info to Wikileaks to post and publicize. That this Russian operation helped to defeat Hillary Clinton in the Presidential election. And now we know from the company that did the investigation admitting under oath that there is no evidence of such a hack. This also vindicates Wikileaks founder Julian Assange. He has always denied that it was the Russians who provided him the DNC emails. And now we know that he was/is right.
Update #3: Yup. The main stream media is ignoring this report .... The CrowdStrike Admission of ‘No Evidence’ that Russia Hacked the DNC Goes Almost Unreported (EIR).
1 comment:
With LexisNexis you can count how many news "stories" there are on a particular event there were in a given time period.
You cannot do that with google.
"Access an unrivaled, global content collection, including a deep news archive and public records, to take your stories to the next level." - LexisNexis
In addition to number of stories, it should be noted story placement, and length (more importantly validity of content, etc).
I mention the above because someone might say the NYT, Washington Post, and others covered it with a token story, token number of stories, spin stories, and other stuff.
Post a Comment