Friday, June 12, 2020

U.S. Alles In Asia Do Nto Want U.S. Missiles Based In Their Country

An experimental version of a new cruise missile is fired from San Nicolas Island, Calif., last August, part of the Pentagon's effort to develop new intermediate range missiles that could be based in Asia. (Scott Howe / Department of Defense)

L.A. Times: U.S. seeks to house missiles in the Pacific. Some allies don't want them

The governor of a Japanese territory where the Pentagon is thinking about basing missiles capable of threatening China has a message for the United States: Not on my island.

“I firmly oppose the idea,” said Gov. Denny Tamaki, the governor of Okinawa, in an email to The Times.

Officials in other Asian countries are also signaling they don’t want them.

But Pentagon planners aren’t backing down after the Trump administration withdrew last year from a 33-year-old arms-control treaty that barred U.S. land-based intermediate range missiles in Asia.

Senior officials now say that putting hundreds of American missiles with non-nuclear warheads in Asia would quickly and cheaply shift the balance of power in the western Pacific back in the United States' favor amid growing Pentagon concern that China’s own expanding arsenal of missiles and other military capabilities threaten U.S. bases in the region and have emboldened Beijing to menace U.S. allies in Asia.

Read more ....

Update: "Not On My Island": More Allies Reject Hosting US Missiles In Pacific Aimed At China

WNU Editor: No one wants to be a target.

16 comments:

Anonymous said...

Everyone is a target.

B.Poster said...

Our "allies" and I are in agreement here. Putting US military assets in a foreign country places them de facto in control of these allies. This risks getting us sucked into conflicts that run contrary to our interests.

Anonymous said...

Постер с комментариями - это в точности русская линия, а не линия Трампа, которую вы всегда утверждаете, поэтому вы обнаруживаете, что вы налицо путинским пенисом.

Anonymous said...


Wrong site, Boronovsky.

Dave Goldstein said...

They are a target anyway. Okinawa has trying to get of us for a long time. Good luck with that

Anonymous said...

I think B Poster likes the abuse from his fellow Russian poster.

Jac said...

"No one wants to be a target"
That is the exactly the opposite effect! Will China want to target American military asset? Too much dangerous! But the one's who has not these one, will be easy pray.
Remember the SS-20 crisis: European countries received the Pershing II...did they become a target? The opposite: this bring immediately a treaty for forbidding missile range from 500 to 5000 km. What a poor world.

Jac said...

Again,
That's also the best way to oblige China to come into the negotiation with Russia and USA for the intermediate range missile as soon they will see to be a target.....as USSR did.

B.Poster said...

Ankn (12:57),

Not sure what your talking about. Maybe anon 10:43 is directed at me. I don't know nor is it relevant to the topic at hand.

Now if you support policies where our people are being used as pawns by unreliable allies, I can't help you. Out "allies" and I are in agreement for once.

logveee said...

WordPress Hosting/
WordPress Hosting/
WordPress Hosting
WordPress Hosting/
WordPress Hosting
WordPress Hosting

logveee said...

WordPress Hosting/
WordPress Hosting
WordPress Hosting
WordPress Hosting
WordPress Hosting

logveee said...

WordPress Hosting
WordPress Hosting
WordPress Hosting
WordPress Hosting
WordPress Hosting
WordPress Hosting

logveee said...

WordPress Hosting
WordPress Hosting
WordPress Hosting
WordPress Hosting
WordPress Hosting
WordPress Hosting

logveee said...

WordPress Hosting
WordPress Hosting
WordPress Hosting
WordPress Hosting
WordPress Hosting
WordPress Hosting

logveee said...

WordPress Hosting/
WordPress Hosting
WordPress Hosting
WordPress Hosting/
WordPress Hosting

logveee said...

WordPress Hosting
WordPress Hosting
WordPress Hosting
WordPress Hosting/
WordPress Hosting
WordPress Hosting/