Here’s what media bias looks like in practice pic.twitter.com/GO69dUSjRT— Matt Mackowiak (@MattMackowiak) August 12, 2020
WNU Editor: That's the New York Times for you. Massive glowing front page coverage for Kamala Harris. Small article critical of Mike Pence when he was selected by then candidate Donald Trump to be his running mate.
7 comments:
How else are people supposed to know how to vote correctly?
Here is a NAZI Anschluss ballot from 1938. Different Day Same Socialists
Great minds think alike ... no?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1938_German_parliamentary_election_and_referendum
Thanks for the link, anon.
The Nazi's were never socialists despite "socialist" appearing in the part name. History, ladies, read it!
12:01,
The NAZIs were socialists
Here are some of their demands. These demands are quite socialist.
- We demand nationalization of all businesses which have been up to the present formed into companies (trusts).
- We demand that the profits from wholesale trade shall be shared out.
- We demand an expansion on a large scale of old age welfare.
- We demand a land reform suitable to our needs, provision of a law for the free expropriation of land for the purposes of public utility, abolition of taxes on land and prevention of all speculation in land.
This NAZI point looks exactly what Big Tech and the Kampus Karens are doing or are demanding.
- We demand legal opposition to known lies and their promulgation through the press. In order to enable the provision of a German press, we demand, that:
I like your casual offhand, "I have always done this" ad hominem attack. To wit "ladies." I'll take your insult and raise it.
What's odd, 1219Anon, is that the Left accuses the Right of using Nazi tactics.
Better to trust NEITHER side and hope for the emergence of a 3rd (and 4th and 5th) political party.
The Nazi's were socialist in name only. This is a renowned international source
https://fullfact.org/online/nazis-socialists/
I like your double post at 1:03 and at 1:05. You know that you having a losing hand. So you muddy the water with your 1:03 and post "trust neither right or left. That is you assert without proof that they are equally bad (more or less).
Then you try to go in for the kill with an argument from authority, which is really the arguments from authority fallacy.
An argument from authority (argumentum ab auctoritate), also called an appeal to authority, or argumentum ad verecundiam, is a form of defeasible argument in which the opinion of an authority on a topic is used as evidence to support an argument
"Scientific knowledge is best established by evidence and experiment rather than argued through authority as authority has no place in science. Carl Sagan wrote of arguments from authority."
All I need is the NAZI's own words. Supposing the translation is good, I presented 5 of the NDSAP's 25 points. Other readers can judge for themselves.
Unless you are going to play further semantic games à la Bill Clinton or just in general play psychological fuck fuck games, then the meaning of phrases like "nationalization of all businesses" are readily apparent.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full_Fact
You are definitely being a prick, a real pendejo.
Post a Comment