Rasmussen Reports: Daily Presidential Tracking Poll
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll sponsored by Liberty Nation for Thursday shows that 51% of likely U.S. voters approve of President Trump’s job performance. Forty-eight percent (48%) disapprove.
The latest figures include 38% who Strongly Approve of the job Trump is doing and 41% who Strongly Disapprove. This gives him a Presidential Approval Index rating of -3. (see trends)
Read more ....
WNU Editor: While Rasmussen's Presidential tracking poll says 51% of likely U.S. voters approve of President Trump’s job performance (2% better than President Obama's approval among voters at the same time in 2012), this new tracking poll is saying that former Vice-President Biden is holding an 11+ national lead over President Trump .... USC Dornsife launches 2020 election tracking poll; Biden leads by 11 points (USC News).
23 comments:
If just goes to show how totally bogus all these democrat sponsored polls are. They are dishonest. They lie. On Nov 3 the nation will reject the Democrats/Marxist party in a landslide similar to the Nixon/McGovern contest in 1972!
Despite the MSM blaming him for everything and calling him and his supporters racist sexist fascist and the storm troopers (Fred and the other gestapo like people) harassing and firing and beating his supporters
Despite a pandemic going on
He still bests Obama
Haha that has to sting
Bigly :)
If the Dems were as confident as they persistantly tell us they are, they wouldn’t be howling about mass mail balloting or Russia (again).
They wouldn’t be actively/desperately trying to engineer chaos into the 2020 election if they had a legitimate candidate that they believed in. Who could win on his merits.
But they don’t. They landed themselves Biden. A 47 year career loser. Of all people.
//btw how did his speech go tonight?
I think it's obvious by now that despite all the narrative, Trump is actually the preferred choice of the intel community and has been for some time. They know and have known for years, and prepared for, the upcoming biggest conflict this earth has ever seen. The Russia collusion hoax is part of it. You'll see. I'm hardly ever wrong, as the little parrot has learned the hard way
There must be money to be made in these polls. The numbers are of a variance,
despite the same topic, as to appeal to a great deal of opinions.
There motto should be we've got you covered. Something for nearly everyone.
Sure he does. Clinton to win by 98%.
When are leftists lying? their lips are moving.
and, oh, right: There was a convention this week by a major party...sort of missed that event, right?
2016: Polls do not count! they are wrong!
2020: This poll is important and counts to make our case
Senate Intelligence Committee Russia Report: Putin Ordered 2016 Democratic Hack
Assange is a journalist
He got something.
Democrats are trying to get us hung up on how instead of what.
What did he get? Democrats crimes & dirty laundry.
I see Fred woke up and immediately went int to mimeograph mode at 7:17. Maybe it was him at 7:13 too.
If you were to use a trend line analysis for Obama and Trump approval using Excel or some other spread sheet, it would be a a horizontal line for both with Trump being slightly higher than Obama.
Of course the trend line algorithm in a spreadsheet package has no political preference.
Over 70 Republican National Security Officials Endorse Biden, Deem Trump ‘Dangerously Unfit’ For President
morning stalker...no emails to me for a few days now...middle school open?
Trump Says He’s Going to Send Cops to the Polls on Election Day. He Can't Do That.
"We’re going to have sheriffs and we’re going to have law enforcement and we’re going to hopefully have U.S. Attorneys and everybody — attorney generals," Trump said.
Miss me clerky? You do a good enough job making a fool out of yourself, you need very little help!
"Over 70 Republican National Security Officials Endorse Biden, Deem Trump ‘Dangerously Unfit’ For President"
Are they really Republican?
I do not believe they are anymore Republican than Rod Rosenstein is Republican. The more I read about Rosenstein, the less I think he is or was Republican, the more of a slimeball I think he is, and that registering Republican is a flag of convenience for him.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_convenience
Rosenstein is Republican simply, because Bush was in office and promoted him. If Gore would have had the military ballots tossed out and thus won the election and promoted Rosenstein, Rod would be a Democrat.
Roman senators switching back and forth form Populares and Optimates and people like Bloomberg switching back & forth from Republican to Democrats show me is that some people wear party affiliation like they would wear a t-shirt.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_convenience
Trump registered as a Republican in Manhattan in 1987 and since that time has changed his party affiliation five times. In 1999, Trump changed his party affiliation to the Independence Party of New York. In August 2001, Trump changed his party affiliation to Democratic. In September 2009, Trump changed his party affiliation back to the Republican Party. In December 2011, Trump changed to "no party affiliation" (independent). In April 2012, Trump again returned to the Republican Party.[4]
What is that Mr. Lapides? What is all that shouting about, all in BOLD?
You think it was not reported or that the news junkies here have not read that Trump was in the same political party as Jesse Ventura?
You may be right! Only 1 in ten billion people know that Trump and Jesse Ventura were in the same political party or that Jesse Ventura switched to Independent Party
I think your post of 11:08 is a newsflash. It is a scoop. You should hang out a shingle as an investigative and publish your gems to a wider audience.
Trump saw that his party left him. He cast about for a new party. As Michael Medved has commented, some of the smaller parties give a person no chance on the national stage. Thus Medved calls the Libertarian Party as the Losertarian Party.
Trump went to the Independent and Reform Parties until he decided that he agreed with Michael Medved.
But, after viewing the complete train wrecks of the dissolute McCain and Romney and the crowded primary fields of of the past, few cycles Trump decided that he could run and win in the Republican primaries.
Jeb Bush obliged him and ran a terrible "Hold my chardonnay, watch this! I'll win without the base campaign."
Jeb like Hillary had a billion dollars to spend. Trump had less and he won.
Given the vast resources of Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton and the fact that they lost, maybe they were bad candidates and did not have any solutions?
PS: I suspect that you are pro-Amnesty, since you are for whatever the NYT or WaPo tell you to be for. You should give Trump another look.
I have commented before that Trump could do Amnesty. And I (nor many of his other supporters) would not be upset. I would not be upset, if he got the wall 1st and then did amnesty.
GWB, McCain Ad Obama wanted Amnesty 1st and wall later (or never). Maybe order of operations is not important in English as taught by modern day miscreants, but it is important in STEM and politics.
the comment, dear one, is simply to suggest that Bloomberg not the only one to switch parties:
" and people like Bloomberg switching back & forth from Republican to Democrats show me is that some people wear party affiliation like they would wear a t-shirt."
does that help you to understand?
" and people like Bloomberg switching back & forth from Republican to Democrats show me is that some people wear party affiliation like they would wear a t-shirt."
I actually prefer people switching parties over people ALWAYS sticking with the party line and doing their bidding. Nothing worse than people goose stepping to a party tune
I personally swear no oath to no party, only to the arguments a party makes. For instance, I'm a life long Democrat. But last election and this election I'll vote Republican. Not because I'm a big Trump fan(I am, but that's not the point), bit because Trump has been right on China for years. You can go back to interviews with him in the 90s (all on YouTube) where he started to call out China. Trump's main mission is to ensure a western value/US dominance over China's aggressions. In my book that's alright with me, considering how China has been behaving, we're at almost war with them and have been for years. I cannot think of a more pressing issue than China and all that leftist talk in the Democrat party is a big turn off for me.
Got a better system than capitalism? I'M ALL EARS. But tell us exactly what you'll do. The Democrats are all talk at the moment, no details.
Defund the police? Are you insane? Do you know what that'll do to small send large business alike(with regards to investor confidence)
So yeah... no oath to no party... only to ideas and values... free speech.. due process.. a well/ better funded and better trained police make sense to me. It's a tough tough job and they don't earn nearly enough. We all want to live safely.. you have 400 million guns on the streets. You need a well funded police. Or go live in Seattle or Portland or NYC and tell me how you fell then , if you don't agree already :))
Trump was looking for a party that shared his ideas on trade policy, etc.
Bloomberg was looking to get elected on a law and order platform, so he switched to Republican and then after he was an incumbent, he switched back.
Bloomberg was dishonest. Trump was not. There is a difference.
As soon as Bloomberg was no longer running for office in NYC, he switched back to his preferred party.
Be honest. You posted what you did at 11:10 because you wanted to make a point that Trump was a hypocrite. You put in all bold font, so that hopefully all readers would take notice and read all about you discovery.
But, we now you will never ever be honest.
PS Nanny Bloomberg (Yes people called him nanny as in nanny state)did stupid stuff like his sugar or cola taxes. And over that same time period people got fatter by double digits. Doomberg was really super effective wads he not?
"We know" not "we now"
Post a Comment