Daily Mail: Trump says his nomination for Supreme Court 'will be a very talented, very brilliant woman' because he likes them 'much more than I like men' as he calls Hispanic judge Barbara Lagoa an 'extraordinary person' and praises Amy Coney Barrett
* President Donald Trump said Saturday his Supreme Court nominee will be a woman as 'I like women more than I like men'
* 'I will be putting forth a nominee this week,' he added at a campaign rally in North Carolina
* He named conservative women Amy Coney Barrett and Barbara Lagoa as possible nominees
* He praised Lagoa in particular as an 'extraordinary person'
* She is a protégé of Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, a close Trump ally
* Barrett is considered a favorite but her devout Catholicism would make her a controversial choice for liberals
* The president has not committed completely to a timeline for the nomination but it it expected within the next seven days
* The timing of the announcement may rely on Ginsburg's burial
President Donald Trump on Saturday announced that his Supreme Court nominee to fill the vacancy caused by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's death will be a 'very talented, very brilliant woman' as 'I like women more than I like men'.
During a campaign rally in North Carolina on Saturday night that Trump branded a 'protest', he declared 'I will be putting forth a nominee this week, it will be a woman'.
Before he left the White House for the rally, Trump had named two conservative women who he has elevated to federal appeals courts as contenders, a move that would tip the court further to the right.
Read more ....
WNU Editor: It looks like we are going to be seeing US Democrat senators attacking a US Supreme Court Justice nominee who also happens to be a woman in the next few weeks. The optics are going to be interesting. Here are the favourites right now for the position .... Sources: Trump Considers Barrett, Lagoa, Rushing For Supreme Court Spot (NPR).
More News On President Trump Saying His Nomination For Supreme Court 'Will Be A Very Talented, Very Brilliant Woman'
Trump pledges woman for court, pushes Senate to move on pick -- AP
Trump will nominate a woman next week to succeed Ginsburg on Supreme Court -- Reuters
Trump expects to nominate woman to replace Ginsburg next week -- The Hill
US Supreme Court: Trump vows to nominate woman as Ginsburg's replacement -- BBC
Trump pledges to name Ruth Bader Ginsburg's successor next week -- DW
12 comments:
Did... Did he really, really... Just say he likes "women more than men"...
A comment that will be taken apart and seen as nothing but an attempt to score poll points.
Such a strange comment.
Yes, and for everyone who watched it - typical Trump joke
I haven’t seen it, but I’m assuming he was saying he would rather a female in that particular position. Or am I wrong?
Looks like somebody joined the woke crowd.😂
Picking a woman perhaps splinters some of the Democrat opposition or maybe their erstwhile 'independent' support.
Liberals are inveterate bean counters. There were 3 women on the court and they will go apeshit and start flinging unless there are 3 again.
Barrett has been mentioned before last go around and the only reason I know anything about her is that the Democrats were ... yup, flinging shit.
Of course Democrats will have their Roe vs Wade litmus test.
"Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don't want to have too many of."
- Ruthless Ginsburg
"Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don't want to have too many of."
- Ruthless Ginsburg
July 7, 2009 New York Times Magazine Interview
Margaret Sanger and Ruthie Ginsberg - birds of a feather
Wait, I thought Cruz and Cotten were on his list. They're not women... although Cruz is pretty wimpy
MEN or WOMEN, WHO CARES SO LONG as you get an ORIGINALIST on the bench.
That is the court. Now for the presidency, Trump is doing the right thing and courting votes.
Monica lewinski?
Q: Does that mean getting rid of the test the court imposed, in which it allows states to impose restrictions on abortion — like a waiting period — that are not deemed an “undue burden” to a woman’s reproductive freedom?
JUSTICE GINSBURG: I’m not a big fan of these tests. I think the court uses them as a label that accommodates the result it wants to reach. It will be, it should be, that this is a woman’s decision. It’s entirely appropriate to say it has to be an informed decision, but that doesn’t mean you can keep a woman overnight who has traveled a great distance to get to the clinic, so that she has to go to some motel and think it over for 24 hours or 48 hours.
I still think, although I was much too optimistic in the early days, that the possibility of stopping a pregnancy very early is significant. The morning-after pill will become more accessible and easier to take. So I think the side that wants to take the choice away from women and give it to the state, they’re fighting a losing battle. Time is on the side of change.
ANOTHER COPY AND PASTE BY PARROT AT 6:36
I can drive across 3 very large states in 1 day. So what is this about motels and stuff?
If you can't drive 4 hours after a scrape put, because it is major, then maybe you should reconsider this major non-surgery?
If you disallow (make it against the law) the selling of baby parts, them you could allow all the abortion, scrape outs, and hoovering you want and Planned Parenthood will still dry up and blow away.
"Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don't want to have too many of."
- Ruthless Ginsburg
Just change the lytrics of the Rob Parissi song to include "eff'n and scraping" and mock the the industrialists of the body part industry.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rob_Parissi
Post a Comment