Contrary to the predictions of some pundits, the presidential race is not tightening up as Election Day approaches. To quote Niall Stanage of The Hill, “The Democratic presidential nominee has a commanding lead in national polls over President Trump, and he has the edge in almost all of the battleground states.”
Joe Biden thus is likely to be elected president in November. If that occurs, U.S. security policies will change. The Trump approach to national security is not unlike the stance of the Republican Party prior to World War II, with a strong emphasis on nationalism, protectionism and isolationism. It is a distinct departure, though, from the priorities espoused by both parties in the postwar era.
Joe Biden played a key role in fashioning the postwar consensus, serving for decades on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and frequently reaching across the aisle to achieve bipartisan compromises. In the process, he became recognized as an authority on national security.
Read more ....
WNU Editor: Biden's campaign has been very clear on what a Biden administration will do when it comes to national security, and this is what I see .... US troops will remain in Afghanistan, and talks with the Taliban to end US participation in the war will be terminated. US troops will not leave Iraq or Syria. President Trump's decision to disengage US forces from many places in Africa will be reversed. There will be US military operations directed against certain countries. Loren Thompson thinks one of them will be Venezuela. He may be right. I also expect an expansion in NSA and other US intelligence agency operations. For more details on what to expect in a Biden administration, check this out .... Biden eyes major foreign policy shifts if he wins (Military Times/AP).
5 comments:
XXX
"President Trump's decision to disengage US forces from many places in Africa will be reversed. "
I disagree with Trumps decision. However, I am voting for Trump.
He is by far more correct than anyone else out there.
We need to have a public, national discussion on why troops are out there. Do we have time? I think we do. We certainly spend a lot of time on politics. Most of it is crap going over the same territory, because of people not coming up to speed and shitty press corps (That is being very generous).
If we have time for riots, political shootings and more, then we have time.
This very blog among many other places report on the number of bases in Africa and the world. By subtle framing of the topic, they imply that the US is an imperial nation bent on gobbling up Africa and the world.
By avoiding the discussion on the need for having people in Africa, we get to avoid discussion like on Islam.
By avoiding discussion and not having a consensus on why we have people there we get the likes of antiwar.org. We get the protest marches, the adherents that spin off into terrorism and more.
Let's bring the troops home. Let's wait until Democrats bitch, whine, and moan about how China and Russian have troops, advisors, and bases in every African country.
Let's bring the troops home. Let's wait until Democrats bitch, whine, and moan about how some Islamic terror group launched an attack on Americans from an African country or how their training bases and funding bases are there.
Sure some Democrat leaders know about what we are up against. Do they do anything about their Democrat base?
No, they let them bitch, whine, and moan.
Why even report on it? Why report on Islamic insurgents tearing things up in Northern Mozambique?
Next stop is South Africa, then there is no more African countries to spread to. Then it is working to gain more and more control in each and every country. Or jump the water to South America or Australia.
JournoLists from the prostitute corps might occasional spotlight a country, where the infection is currently active and after awhile they shift the spotlight away with no comprehensive reporting. But they will do a yearly "OMG, why there are so many American Bases"
So why not bring them home?
The Pentagon Does Not Have A 'Light' Footprint In Africa
FEBRUARY 28, 2020
WNU
PENTAGON’S OWN MAP OF U.S. BASES IN AFRICA CONTRADICTS ITS CLAIM OF “LIGHT” FOOTPRINT
"A formerly secret map from AFRICOM shows a network of 29 U.S. military bases that stretch from one side of Africa to another."
February 27 2020, 6:00 a.m.
Nick Turse
U.S. MILITARY SAYS IT HAS A “LIGHT FOOTPRINT” IN AFRICA. THESE DOCUMENTS SHOW A VAST NETWORK OF BASES.
"At least 34 U.S. military bases are scattered across Africa, with high concentrations in the north, west, and Horn of Africa."
December 1 2018, 6:00 a.m.
Nick Turse
The Chinese Have Fortified Their Base In Djibouti
Looks like nickle's worth has an agenda.
Any discussion of US bases without looking at Chinese and Russian bases is worthless, partisan and a hack job.
xxx
"The Big Guy" 2020
Post a Comment