Saturday, October 10, 2020

Hillary Clinton Calls For Massive Cuts In U.S. Defense Spending

Clinton with U.S. soldiers in Kabul, Afghanistan, November 2009. Mustafa Quraishi / AP 


 * Clinton penned a lengthy column on defense policy for Foreign Affairs magazine 
 * In it, she argues much defense spending should be shifted to 'domestic renewal' 
 * Clinton argues that military spending is out of line with current world threats 
 * Notes that China has 'asymmetric' capabilities that could take out carriers 
 * Believes that large land wars are no longer a possibility in the modern world 
 * Says domestic supply chains, climate change and pandemics are bigger threats 
 * In a separate essay, she argues Joe Biden is the best candidate to 'right the ship' 

Hillary Clinton has called on Congress to slash the Pentagon's budget and shift funding to 'domestic renewal' and foreign diplomacy, arguing that expensive weapons systems from the Cold War and war on terror are no longer needed. 

In a lengthy essay published in Foreign Affairs magazine on Friday, the former secretary of state laid out her vision for restructuring U.S. defense spending, while accusing the Trump administration of mismanagement. 


WNU Editor: Her Foreign Policy column is here .... A National Security Reckoning (Hillary Clinton, Foreign Affairs). As to what is my take. Why the column? Is she looking for a job in a Biden administration?

7 comments:

RussInSoCal said...

Here is Clinton's her twisted logic (pipe dream):

Biden wins.
Kamala resigns and remains Senator.
Biden names Hillary as Veep.
Biden resigns before inauguration.


HER,
FUHRER,

R,

Anonymous said...

I'd imagine if there was a war and the US didn't have the fighter jets, tanks, and aircraft carriers they needed her answer would be "what difference does it make?"

Anonymous said...

A few comments

The defense budget is based on the Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR). The QDR is based on the relative capabilities and limitations of the US, its allies and out potential enemies. It is also based on models (i.e. wargames) conducted in the field with real hardware at the battalion to fleet level and on paper/computers.

Mrs. Clinton, who has a poly-sci degree, a JD, and a long rap sheet can show us how we can forego actual military forces for a time period without China and others taking advantage of it, she should be able write more than a one to three page essay where a lot is glossed over, hand waved, heuristically argued or assumed. She can do some war gaming or conduct some studies.

Hillary and he ilk are not going to revive the economy by banning fracking, The Green New Deal, progressive taxes, more regulations, and Wir Shaffen Das (Make it So). Wir Shaffen Das works in TV shows not real life. In real life you need electricians, engineers, accountants, MBA's, chemists and physicists not poly sci, communications and journalism majors.

Those latter 3 majors should be sent a 劳改 on Baffin Island in Nunavut for the survival of the species.

Anonymous said...

Israel uses the F-35. That is enough for me.

Israel is the tippy top point of the spear. There is no bullshit about using and keep using military equipment that doesn't work.

Israel has built their own fighter jets (KFIR) and tanks (Merkava). If it didn't work, Israel probably would not use it. Israel has sortied into Syria against Russian equipment operated by Syrians and maybe the Russians. If it wasn't the latest Russian equipment it was close to it.


Hillary the Bitch Clinton should stay in her New York environs with her Billion dollars that she scrounged up for Russian and other donations.

Anonymous said...

Hillary scares me as she twice rejected the will of the people and on top was ok with a coup and manipulating the electoral process by accepting info on town hall questions through Donna Brazille, a former and again disgraced CNN/ Democrat shill. On top she destroys subpoenaed evidence on large scale and her Clinton foundation pay to play scheme, her real, video taped health and energy issues.

Come on. She must be dreaming if she thinks she's got a majority backing her in a pipe dream .. only reason is to stay relative, take heat off her countless crimes and hopefully soon concluding investigations that ideally end in prison time for treason and a real attempted coup. Together with Comey, Obama, Brennan and the rest of the cabal who conspired to and then executed a plan to overthrow a duly elected president.

She's pathological and a clear case ofc true entitlement. Of course the Democrats LOVE her. Fck laws. As she herself argued on society and civil norms: "civility can be restored when we are back in power"...and she said that after her party colleague, another stellar woman who we are told are the future, Maxine Waters, called for the "formation of mobs" and the "intimidation and harassment" of her political enemies, ie Republicans.

Countless people with white skin colour and red hat colour were intimidated and beaten in the aftermath of the comments of these two female "leaders". No thank you. Until there are real leaders in the Democrat party, who stop the wars, the leftist extremism and violence and tyranny, I want no part of such future and the Democrat party is as dead and rejected as the Chinese communist party/CCP

Anonymous said...

Hillary Clinton? Never heard of her. What makes her opining newsworthy?

Anonymous said...


Why 11:26, haven't you heard? The Libya takeover and Ghadaffi[sp} take down?

Victory parade plans are being given the final go by obamma.