* Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi accused CNN host Wolf Blitzer of being a 'Republican apologist' in a heated live interview Tuesday
* The California congresswoman went into meltdown as Blitzer slammed her over refusing Trump's $1.8trillion COVID-19 relief bill
* Blitzer pushed Pelosi as to why fellow Democrats are calling on her to accept the deal presented last week if it is not adequate
* He asked her to look Americans 'in the eye... and explain why you don't want to accept the president's latest stimulus offer'
* She hit back that Blitzer and others on her party did not know what they are talking about and are not negotiating the deal
* Pelosi has become increasingly isolated as other Democrats insist she come to a compromise on the relief bill before election day
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi slammed veteran CNN host Wolf Blitzer as a 'Republican apologist' in a fiery meltdown on Tuesday evening.
During the heated live segment on 'The Situation Room', Blitzer pushed the Californian congresswoman to say why she is holding up President Donald Trump's $1.8trillion COVID-19 relief bill, leaving Pelosi fuming that he didn't know what he was talking about.
Blitzer hit back by asking why Pelosi's Democrat allies are calling on her to get the deal done, citing the likes of former Democratic presidential candidate Andrew Yang and fellow California Democrat Ro Khanna.
Read more ....
WNU Editor: I got the above video from a friend who wanted to know if the House Speaker is flustered and mad because she does not feel confident that the Democrats will do well in the elections. I burst his bubble. It is not the election that concerns her, it is the hearings that are currently underway with Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett. She does not want this nominee to go forward, but she is powerless to stop this nominee from being confirmed. What do you think?
11 comments:
McConnell is called the turtle for a reason. Does he look scared?
Pelosi! Democrats!
Trump is right to stick to Fox, where he is now only somewhat liked.
Why so much on Pelosi and CNN since those visiting here mostly dislike and distrust CNN and so too the NY Times and all other media but Zero Hedge and a few more questionable sites
1) It is always goof to know what the other side is doing and thinking.
2) We've been shocked that CNN & others have been doing random acts of journalism.
3) You already knew 1 & 2. Why so coy?
Not much of any as real story and I had read about it in msm
What a disgusting venomous woman she is, filled with hate and bile.
She was under pressure from many sides and didn't handle it well.
Not being familiar with her except in the printed form and then only minimally I am greatly surprised at her behavior in front of a camera.
What is more discomforting is that this is third in the line of succession should the president and vice president pass on.
The democrats appear to be a crumbling party. Their performance with the virus is amateurishly incompetent and is appalling when faced with the violence, looting, and deliberate destruction in their cities that goes on.
These are not men and women to match the mountains of their making.
Not the first time Pelosi's been mildly challenged by CNN. Didn't go well the the last time either.
She's an arrogant, coddled San Francisco elitist who is totally unused to receiving probing questions by the her media lapdog.
San Fransisco has produced the worst group of politicians in history: Pelosi, Kamala Harris and the CA Gov. Newsom. That's a hell of a consolidation of power from a city that can't keep human feces off its streets.
What do you think? Unless we have inside information we cannot "know" hence we are left with what we "think." If we evaluate the available existence properly, we can usually "think" things through and arrive at the right answer!!
What do I think? It is the job of the Senate to confirm a SCOTUS nominee not the House. As such, this is outside of the realm of a Speaker of the House so there's no reason for her to fret about this at all. Furthermore this interviews was about additional stimulus not about SCOTUS.
If we assume the polls are accurate, we are headed for a massive "blue wave." Based upon the words and actions of the Democrats it seems with the blue wave they will do the following. 1.)Pack the Supreme Court rendering the confirmation of ACB irrelevant assuming she's actually confirmed which is not gjven. 2.) Abolish the filibuster. 3.) Grant statehood to DC, Puerto Rico abd others that are overwhelmingly Democrat. All of the above will be easy to do assuming the predicted blue wave happens. As such, there's no reason why Nancy Pelosi would be concerned about SCOTUS or the current nominee. I'm inclined to believe the analysis of your friend is correct. They know the polls aren't what they are telling us they are and they are indeed flustered.
Another fabulous bit of coherence from Fred.
I didn't write that at 11:10 PM. I didn't see the author's point But upon rereading it and your original post for the 4th or 5th time, I get it.
You weighed in, said the opposition was full of it and provided no facts. That is the Fred that we know and loathe.
Nice Post.
Also check this out
Laptops, Mobiles, Games, Tv, Smartwatches etc Daily Tech News Updates.
Post a Comment