BIDEN: "Those who say the blood of Patriots, you know, and all the stuff about how we’re gonna have to move against the government.”
— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) June 23, 2021
"If you think you need to have weapons to take on the government, you need F-15s and maybe some nuclear weapons."pic.twitter.com/WVHUffpphP
New York Post editorial: Is no one going to mention how confusing and out of it Biden was?
President Biden’s topic was one of utmost importance Wednesday — crime and gun violence. But you wouldn’t know it from the way he spoke.
He slurred his words. He called the ATF “the AFT.” At one point, he talked about the history of the Second Amendment and “the blood of patriots” before concluding that someone would need nuclear weapons to take down the government. If you weren’t confused, you were horrified.
Biden was obviously tired, speaking in barely a monotone. He couldn’t pronounce “cognitive.”
Read more ....
WNU Editor: He was tired yesterday. It was obvious to anyone watching. But he was very creepy today (see video below). In the past month he has gotten into the habit of whispering into the microphone to make a point. But even with all of this concerning behavior, according to a FOX poll he is pulling a 56% approval rating .... Biden's approval rating rises to 56 percent in Fox News poll (The Week).
15 comments:
Biden has been a weird, moronic jackass his entire adult life. Now he’s installed as POTUS. We currently have a demented, weird moronic jackass who grimaces and whispers into his microphone to emphasize his inane mouthings.
We are the world’s laughing stock.
Fusion, biden isn't very much in control. Certainly doesn't hold a candle to DJT who had the scandalous obamma dregs fighting him with a dishonesty I've never known in my 75 years on this planet. I feel this will become more evident as time goes by.
56% approval...well as long he his giving money to people, why not?
"If you think you need to have weapons to take on the government, you need F-15s and maybe some nuclear weapons."
Nobody told the vietcong or the taliban and they still won with rifles and cheap life.
"According to a Fox poll"
Are Fox polls as good as Fox advertising? I cannot find the quote, but Rush Limbaugh covered the sad state of American advertising. Fox contracts with the usual Madison avenue advertisers and they screw their customer. The woke advertisers did not match Fox's audience demographic with product sellers by market share or by demographic and buying power. Instead Fox viewers say back to back Enztye commercials of Smiling Bob. This was 10 to 20 years ago. The employees of these Madison Avenue advertising agencies were woke before the term was invented.
It is no different than teachers, who are bound and determined to teach every last time on the SJW list and give reading, writing and arithmetic short shrift.
It happens in many industries or work places.
Sop there was a a Fox poll. Do I automatically trust it after I have seen Fox advertising or how the younger Murdochs try to virtue signal?
"Nobody told the vietcong or the taliban and they still won with rifles and cheap life."
O got to believe you are trolling or are public education graduate of a Moscow high school. Not too bright,
"On 17 November 1964, the Soviet Politburo decided to send increased support to North Vietnam. This aid included aircraft, radar, artillery, air defense systems, small arms, ammunition, food and..."
https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/vietnam/hist-2nd-indochina-ussr.htm
Don't like the source Beelzebub, another source can be found.
"What is wrong with you guys down there?" This is a good question. Significant election irregularities likely changed the outcome of a presidential election and no one wants to do anything about it.
The question could and probably should be asked what's wrong with our allies. They including Canada could simply refuse to deal with team Biden. Thus far the opposite seems to be the case. As long as our allies enable the travesty of dementia Joe, it's going to be difficult if not impossible for us to reverse the situation.
How accurate is the Fox poll? Anon @ 12:09 raises interesting points that I've observed as well. Essentially I wouldn't say it's wrong but based on the track record I'm skeptical. Rasmussen has Biden's approval rating at 51%. When we wish to find out what's really going on in matters such as this, Rasmussen is the go to source.
The polls are faked.
"If you think you need weapons to take on the government...." certainly weapons of the types mentioned such as planes and nuclear weapons are possessed by a number of our adversaries and they've generally not been shy about sharing them with those who have interests that mesh with theirs. Maybe it's not such a good idea to needlessly provoke certain individuals and countries. Also, the US military possesses such weapons and may not tolerate the current travesty indefinitely. Furthermore, when real and capable adversaries are as abundant as they are, maybe expending precious and limited resources combating a phantom such as "white supremacy" isn't such a good idea.
Fox and Rasmussen are right-leaning and still give Biden a higher rating in the first few months of his term than Trump ever got in 4 years.
tip: American pragmatism. Judge the pudding by the taste and not the looks. Judge Biden by results
Something like 35 million hunting licenses are sold every year. Throw in former cops and military you probably have 40 million capable riflemen with field craft skills. If 1% of them became rebels active against the government that would be 4 million rebels. there are only about 900,000 cops out there. the point I am making is this corrupt mess can be taken down by the 2nd amendment. They know it and that is why they work so hard to undermine the 2nd. The thing is, we are still buying over priced housing, driving smart cars and smart phones ect. the status quo is still there. But, if they ever let this thing come crashing down, pensions gone, nothing in the stores or gas stations, there could be enough to motivate .05% of the skilled riflemen, and then, look out.
Ron
Rasmussen has an excellent track record. This is how they are judged, by the record. As for Fox, the "on air" personnel may be right leaning but where they draw their polling from isn't any different than the typical mainstream polls leaving me skeptical of the results.
Biden's ratings do trend a bit higher than Trump's on average according to Rasmussen. Trump typically polled at between about 46 to 50% and on the day he left office he stood at 51%. Biden's polling numbers typically seem to average around 48 to 52%. This isn't really surprising. Given the wall to wall positive coverage Biden receives compared to wall to wall negative coverage Trump received, it would be expected that this would affect ratings somewhat. It appears that between 2 to 3% of the populace is heavily influenced by media coverage which would certainly be enough to benefit someone in a tight election. When we want to get to the bottom of matters such as this, we look at Rasmussen. Unfortunately dismissing them based upon a superficial analysis simply because someone says they are "right leaning" is the kind of simplistic thought that passes for much of decision making in America today.
I think we can agree that we should judge Biden or any other leader by the results. The jury is still out has been said. For those paying attention the obvious mental decline is a major concern.
Judge by the taste. Such a meaningless saying with so much wiggle room for a liar.
Bien is bad.
Kamala is bad.
It is like the FBI you want to say most of them are good. But after you have half dozen going on a dozen or a score who are bad, you have to wonder about the whole damn barrel.
Most of the nominees are problematic. They are racists and/or have other warts. Yeah the who damn administration/barrel is bad.
Trotting Biden out there is elder abuse. People like that are evil and will be judged as such including apologists like you.
Ever notice that Fox, NY Post and anyone from the Right (trumpies) never say or print or post anything but badmouthing, dissing, name-calling stuff rather than dealing with substantive things, ie policy, proposals, ideas¿
and you know more shit will now be put up here to badmouth my comment.
That of course if proves what I have said
WELL, THEN, HERE IS ANOTHER WAY TO EXPLORE POLICIES
Post a Comment