* The woman- who has not been identified due to military policy for special forces members- is officially a Naval Special Warfare combatant-craft crewman
* SWCC operators transport Navy SEALs and conduct their own classified missions at sea and are experts with weapons, navigation, and special operations tactics
* The sailor is the first of 18 women who have tried out for a job as a SWCC or a SEAL to succeed just five years after all combat posts were opened to women
* Only about 35 percent of the men and women who begin the training for SWCC actually graduate, the Navy reported
* The 37 week training course includes extensive running, swimming, and other exercises conducted in all weather conditions and with very little sleep
* About 300 sailors attempt the SWCC course every year and about 70 complete it. There are between 760 and 800 in the force at any one time
A female sailor made history after completing a grueling 37-week training course to become the Navy's first female special operator.
The woman - who has not been identified due to military policy for special forces members - is officially a Naval Special Warfare combatant-craft crewman.
The boat operators transport Navy SEALs, conduct their own classified missions at sea and are experts with weapons, navigation, and special operations tactics.
She is the first of 18 women who have tried to become a SWCC or a SEAL to succeed just five years after all combat posts were opened to women.
Read more ....
More News On The 1st Female Sailor Completing US Naval Special Warfare Training
'An extraordinary accomplishment': First female sailor completes Navy special warfare training -- USA Today
Woman qualifies for Naval Special Warfare Command crew for the first time -- CNN
Female sailor becomes the first woman to complete Naval Special Warfare training -- FOX News
US Navy: First woman passes elite training scheme -- BBC
A woman has qualified as the Navy’s first female special operator -- Task & Purpose
10 comments:
Don't care what's between your legs, just do the job
I am suspicious as this happened during a Democrat administration.
Actually women are needed in Special Ops. Increases their capabilities. Also, unfortunately, most military eligible men are overweight not capable of physical activity, have drug or alchohol ddiction problems, serious criminal records or aren't smart enough to pass any of the entrance exams. Plus so many hate the USA. Therefore the military needs women to staff ships, subs, planes, and combat units.
I am not sure the training remains the same or that the instructors are impartial.
so sick of this.. if you are fit for the job, you qualify.. no one cares but the fanatic, divisive left
and the equity and inclusion BS is ruining the navy due to all their mandatory trainings and inclusion programs
but I agree, for certain operations it is more effective to have women, e.g. to blend in with a crowd you often mix one gender with another... but this is less likely that .. most of the work requires extreme physical capabilities and if you face a Russian soldier, it's likely going to be a 6foot 200lbs dude who eats bunnies like we send and prop up as tokens for breakfast.. and they will get raped by them.. and killed..
but as long as we submit to the leftist cult to include for inclusion purposes, not mission, then this alllll will surely work out just great while we stare down china and russia
these people will kill us all including that lady (who I'd love to see, but she is of course anonymous and we are not allowed to look, because super secret.. just like every black shooter and murderer in the USA is a secret and his face is not allowed to be shown nor the name named).. and we saw to what this leads.. a public that believes the narratives of CNN (who applaud the murderous CCP just a few days ago).. this is madness
and to the commentator above that she would fck us up.. I hope so, that's her damn job and she better do it right :)
This is good and make competition that drive men to do their best.
Jac, I disagree.. for years and years the message from the left is that masculinity is toxic, men are being emotionally destroyed by subliminal messaging in Ads and movies all for the greater good to build up women.. look at the result.. men are getting weak sends fat, women are getting ugly and sad lol
Over simplified.. but I don't see that competition in the military increases..I see men being told to not be Male and women being told not to have family.
I've seen first hand what this experiment does to both genders.. no one gets happier but in fact more miserable..our military force gets weaker and weaker.. look at the recent navy report with interviews and statements in the report about the havoc that racial and gender inclusion programs and all the meetings and all the emails cause. It easily makes up 10%of daily navy business. And with the outcome that the navy gets weaker, fighting readiness and training get replaced with woke shit, instead of fighting men to protect women we tell men that they're not worth it the future is female and we actively select females ahead of males for promotion despite that they're better and more qualified.
That's NOT social justice, that's an assault on the wests ability to communicate effectively and work effectively with up to 10%tied up in BS HR and woke work.
It is a recipe for disaster and on top it is ethically wrong to hold down a gender artificially, tell them they'r toxic and have a quota not merit based system which we all know is the case
So this must stop and the people responsible should be demoted for dividing the nation in lies AND on top weakening the nation while we're under attack by an adversary who will push us into ovens. They're like Nazi Germany but 1.5in strong and we not only cannot afford this madness anymore but it is the duty of every man and woman to push back against this injustice and clear destruction of our capabilities.
I bet they lowered the standards so she could "pass".
In order for the female to pass the course, the standards for passing were lowered to accommodate the biological realities of her being female (i.e. weaker physically, slower, etc.)
Look I don't care if they lowered some standards but kept others in place, as long as she can survive and won't risk the lives of her other team members.
She might be 6ft for all we know, women like this exist and my worry for that single individual isn't that great, I'm sure she's tough as nails.
BUT.. within the US army the are also men where I'm not sure they qualify as tough fighters. My concern is that the weak men syndrome also exists in their selected women. And I cannot imagine that if they're not the toughest women of all women that they survive longer than a few minutes against Russians. That's really my concern.
This drive to recruit seems to lower standards across both genders, but as women already have such an uphill struggle, they mustn't lower standards for them, or they might die very quickly.
I think the US and UK militaries go about it the wrong way. They need to address the decades of delusion really. Pointless wars that are abandoned after years and years and years with thousands of dead soldiers (and hundreds of thousands of dead civilians in the countries that had the pleasure to be the target of the military industrial, deep state complex)
Until this moral deterioration is addressed and future wars have clear mission goals, they'll have to lower standards more and more because no one wants to fight an unjust and abandoned war... it's just nuts..
Post a Comment