The fence around the Capitol. (WTOP/Mitchell Miller)
VOA/AP: Police Plan to Reinstall US Capitol Fence Ahead of Rally
WASHINGTON - Law enforcement concerned by the prospect of violence at a rally in the nation's capital next week are planning to reinstall protective fencing that surrounded the U.S. Capitol for months after the January 6 insurrection there, according to a person familiar with the discussions.
Though no specific measures have been announced, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi hinted during her weekly press conference Wednesday at extra safety precautions for the September 18 rally by saying: "We intend to have the integrity of the Capitol be intact.
" Some lawmakers and top union officials were expected to be briefed on the plan later this week, and another more expansive briefing for the leaders of the House and Senate was planned for Monday.
Read more ....
WNU Editor: As a non-American looking in from the outside, I find it incredible that U.S. leaders are so afraid of their citizens.
31 comments:
Note to any citizens who plan to attend this rally: Leave your damn iphone at home.
Ex-Marines in neo-Nazi terror cell planned to attack power grid as precursor to assassination campaign: government
they're not scared of anyone they're trying to paint any opposition as terrorists
The hallmark sign of a legitimate government...
Barb wire and constant state of emergency
In the 50s we focused upon Marxists, commies, leftists. After 9/11 we turned our attention, along with Homeland Security, to jihadists, Muslim terrorists. Now our focus is upon domestic terrorists, those who would subvert the nation from within. We look forward to seeing you with facial identification and social media.
The Surprisingly Strong Supreme Court Precedent Supporting Vaccine Mandates
September 10, 2021 at 5:45 AM
Ex-Marines in neo-Nazi terror cell planned to attack power grid as precursor to assassination campaign: government
September 10, 2021 at 4:56 AM
Does anyone see an empty headed, regurgitating style here? Same person gets up, sit down in their dirty whities and starts spamming article headlines.
Porn will rot your mind.
"Unmentioned in his exchange with Collins on Iron March, Kryscuk had been working as a porn actor under the name of "Pauly Harker" since 2009. Several of the films that feature Kryscuk "degrade Black women, according to websites that track abusive porn," HuffPost has reported.
LOL i am familiar with Pauly Harker's work and let me assure you that it is extremely offensive in every way. It's not the kind of porn normal people watch, we're talking real foul stuff.
Surprised he'd be tied up in some shit like this, honestly."
www.reddit.com/r/LessCredibleDefence/comments/pl8u3x/exmarines_in_neonazi_terror_cell_planned_to/
The fencing looks akin to the wooden palisades the Normans build around their castles. After Hastings the Normans went north Harrying the North and indiscriminately killing peasants. Harrying the North is akin the CRT. My kids are half half and they see no need for CRT. They see it as baleful.
Does anyone see an empty headed, regurgitating style here? Same person gets up, sit down in their dirty whities and starts spamming article headlines.
the same comment to that which is not liked by that anon
offers no content but only snark
California lawmakers vote to return Manhattan Beach property worth $72M to descendants of black family who owned resort a century ago until they were forced out by white neighbors and the KKK
Who was president a century ago?
Who screened "Birth of a Nation" in the White House?
"The Birth of a Nation'; the 1915 film screened at the White House depicting blacks as savages. ... It's also the first film to be shown in the White House of Woodrow Wilson."
https://face2faceafrica.com/article/the-birth-of-a-nation-the-1915-film-screened-at-the-white-house-depicting-blacks-as-savages
8:53. See that linked url? Blacks know it was Woodrow Wilson (DEMOICRAT), who did that. They know he stocked the fires of racism.
But go on tell us that Woodrow won WW1. That is your usual jingo
After King Democrat Woodrow Wilson resuscitated the KKK, it did not begin to die again until the sex scandal n the train.
But there isn’t really any middle ground on overthrowing the government. And that is what Mr. Trump and his allies were up to in 2020, through both violent and nonviolent means — and continue to be up to today.
When it comes to a coup, you’re either in or you’re out. The Republican Party is leaning pretty strongly toward in. That is going to leave at least some conservatives out — and, in all likelihood, permanently out.
9:08
You style the election., We see that in the Atlanta video. The "poll workers" run the same ballots through the machine 6 times. Republican poll watchers were denied access in Detroit and Philadelphia.
So keep funning yourself by rep[eating your lies. Eventually even you will believe your own bullshit.
You are up so early today, you must be on you second of your three daily tranches of porn pictures.
ah, Wilson! the past! ps his wife a southern lass, made sure hubby got rid of all blacks working for govt in DC. And Nixon, impeached! did these nice things
In 1973, President Nixon ended the draft, moving the United States Military to an all-volunteer force.
Nixon founded the Environmental Protection Agency in 1970 as a response to the rising concern over conservation and pollution. The agency oversaw the passage of the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act and the Mammal Marine Protection Act.
Nixon ushered in a new era of judicial restraint by appointing four Supreme Court Justices: Chief Justice Burger, Chief Justice Harry Blackmun, Chief Justice Lewis Powell and William Rehnquist, who was later appointed to Chief Justice by Ronald Reagan.
Nixon dedicated a $100-million to begin the war on cancer, a campaign that led to the creation of national cancer centers and antidotes that helped fight the deadly disease.
Nixon opened the doors for women in collegiate sports when he signed Title IX in 1972, a civil rights law preventing gender bias at colleges and universities receiving Federal aid.
Nixon initiated and oversaw the peaceful desegregation of southern schools.
so we can play that game if you want but I would prefer to deal with the here and now
I agree with 916
I believe the election was stolen because I've watched with my own eyes how poll watchers were kept out and how ballot boxes were pulled out at night, recorded on video, and then counted in absence of the poll watchers
I know the media tells me it ain't so, but I don't need them to tell me what's true and what's not true. Especially not these lying bastards
And I have to say, I grew up in a Democrat household, but a few years ago I noticed that they started changing.. they started to constantly lie, to constantly collude and coordinate with the MSM - who all say the same lies and when caught do their corrections like on page 5 two months or two years later, and I noticed that the actual Democrat voters never seem to catch up to this
I also think the Republican party is mostly shit and corrupt, but the Democrats turned into something entirely different, unrecognizable to what they used to be when I was in my 20s..
And it's not just that I got older, I'm not even 40, but they have changed so much and the things they do seem to only have one goal... division and destruction
And it's horrible to watch how CNN is allowed to propagate the racism lie to the extent that cities burn, people get murdered, including cops, law and sentencing against Chauvin was outrageous and you can bet they'll do the same with Rittenhouse
And it's all based on racist lies, division, hatred and they do it to push through changes in society that otherwise no one would accept
But people don't see it they're full on programmed
"ah, Wilson! the past! ps his wife a southern lass, made sure hubby got rid of all blacks working for govt in DC. And Nixon, impeached! did these nice things"
"ah, Wilson! the past! ps his wife a southern lass"
It is not PS. It is your BS.
"Wilson was born and raised in the South by parents who were committed supporters of both slavery and the Confederacy. Academically, Wilson was an apologist for slavery, the southern redemption movement and one of the foremost promoters of lost cause mythology"
Nixon impeached for what? Doing what LBJ did? Pfffft.
"Wilson's election was celebrated by southern segregationists."
"But, but Woodrow Wilson was great. He won WW1 !" - Parrot Breath
there is good and bad in all people. And in leaders this mix is often apparent. Sorry to say,but the world is not as simple as you would like it to be.
Those on the Right marched on the Capitol and broke into offices. That is a fact. some 600 of that mob are indicted thus far. And now, with another Gathering of Trump supporters planned, our govt would be remiss if it did not take all the steps necessary to prevent another breaking into federal buildings. If you do not like the appearance of materials that will be used to protect our national buildings, then write a letter to your representatives.
Those on the Right marched on the Capitol and broke into offices. That is a fact. some 600 of that mob are indicted thus far.
600
20 of them FBI informants.
The FBI dropped the insurrection charge. DROPPED!
The charges were dropped, so that the FBI informants would not be cross examined. If the conversations, text, emails and other things had been shown in broad daylight in a court, the FBI would be through.
Add to it 5 to 8 Leftists dressed in MAGA gear instigating shit.
Take you shit and go home.
can you give us the names of the 5-8 leftists dressed in MAGA gear. We now have 600 names on record of those arrested. Names, please.
there are some 600 people charged with crimes for Jan 6. if some were indeed FBI people or leftists, how does that mitigate 550 people smashing doors and windows and stealing a laptop and having plastic ties and dynamite and threatening to hand Pence?
A new domestic terrorism response that includes social media monitoring of the sort that might have prevented the attack on the Capitol, but few of the other things Spencer and others have never stopped predicting since January 6.
A discussion of the actions of the January 6 Select Committee, on which committee Elissa Slotkin (the Democrat Spencer quoted twice and on whom his book focuses) doesn’t sit. The committee has provided a way around the need to placate Republicans trying to avoid angering Trump, to say nothing of committees (like the House Oversight Committee) packed with key figures in the events of January 6. The committee has already moved to obtain the records of the people that Spencer claims have escaped accountability.
A description of Merrick Garland’s repeated comments, starting in his February 22 confirmation hearing and continuing since, that DOJ would go where the evidence leads, including to those who incited it. Garland’s DOJ has also found important ways to avoid sheltering Mo Brooks (and by association all other people who were Federal employees the day of the riot, as Trump was), and to waive executive privilege to allow multiple investigations into Trump’s actions to proceed.
How DOJ under Merrick Garland and Lisa Monaco has approached the January 6 investigation, notably with its use of the unpoliticized obstruction statute to charge felonies rather than (thus far at least) sedition, the use of interlocking conspiracies that have already started incorporating some organizers and which could easily be used with Trump and his flunkies, and the possibility of terrorism enhancements that would be decided at sentencing, by judges, rather than by categorial exception at the start of investigation.
There are definitely ways that the two decade war on terror played a big role on January 6.
More important than the 22 veterans charged by early February is which figures in the organizing conspiracies applied their military experience to ensuring the success of the operation. Key among those is former Staff Sergeant Joe Biggs, who served in both Iraq and Afghanistan before he went on to play a key propaganda role in the 2016 election; as I’ve described, Biggs was at the head of both major fronts (East Side, West Side) of the attack, and his network incorporates the key organizers of the larger event. Charles Donohoe, Dominic Pezzola, Gabriel Garcia, Jessica Watkins, and Joshua James are other veterans who allegedly turned their war on terror training to play key roles leading an attack on the Capitol. The second front of the attack on the Capitol that Biggs seemed to have anticipated was opened — either coincidentally, or not — by a bunch of Marines, including one on active duty.
John Sullivan and his crew.
11:10 is one of the new bot trolls, which can string together sentences. Reports are they originate out of Russia. Although after a year or so it is safe to bet China also used the tech.
It is not a copy and paste job.
It is a copy and paste in that the bot take sentences for multiple articles dozen or mare and strings them together (Concatenates them).
Lol 1135, everyone you disagree with is a Russian bot.
Let me guess.
You're a Democrat and you watch MSM
How do I know this?
Because you're programmed to parrot this and you believe these are original thoughts or that you're really here, present at this moment.
You're not.
You are the true 5th gen bot and you don't even know
It's sad
sir--
You are the sad one. Can you post something of substance and not simply saying shit about those you do not care for? Your comments are nothing but nasty
and childish name calling.
As for the "20 FBI" at the Jan 6 insurrection, name the 20 or even 3. I can give you a list of some 600 plus who have been arrested for what they had done that day.
suh --
Look up the 20 yourself. You might have to give up time looking up free pictures of naked Russian women. Everyone doubts you would make such a sacrifice.
Remember the aphorism that "If something is free, then you are the commodity" ?
ah, still going to my site!
I do not do the work for you. Some anon lied and claimed 20 FBI people in the Jan 6 crowd. I challenged that statement. He who asserts must prove. Ever hear of that legal nugget?
ps: the aphorism you tossed in has no bearing on the issue.
No, I just remember what it was like 3 years ago after I took a look see at your crappy website. If the pictures are free and nothing is free, then perhaps there is malware in the pictures.
When people scream at you every day that 600 people were arrested and only 580 were charged, people can do the math, We know you cannot, but most other people can.
After the Whitmer fiasco it has people rightly asking, what did the FBI know and when did they know it.
It has people asking in the Whitmer case did the 6 or 7 FBI informants badger people to do something? The FBI informants were around half of the so called conspiracy. If there were 12 conspirators and 8 were informants, would it grab your attention then? I what point would it?
Looking this stuff up for 10 minutes, I saw accusation that the Tsernaev brothers did not make the bomb. If they did not make them bomb, it calls into question what the FBI is doing.
You write "Nixon dedicated a $100-million to begin the war on cancer, a campaign that led to the creation of national cancer centers and antidotes that helped fight the deadly disease." You evidently bought into the authorized propaganda.
The official mainstream "war on cancer" has been an unofficial "war" on the unsuspecting public: to keep them misinformed and misguided about the real truth of this "war." The "moonshot" program is an extension or reincarnation of the enduring deep racket.
The orthodox cancer establishment has been saying a cure for cancer "is just around the corner" and "we're winning the war on cancer" for decades. It's all hype and lies (read Dr. Guy Faguet's 'War on cancer," Dr. Sam Epstein's work, or Clifton Leaf's book, or Dr. Siefried's work on this bogus 'war', etc). The criminal medical establishment deliberate and falsely self-servingly claims and distorts a 'win' in the bogus 'war on cancer' when the only notably win is a reduction in lung cancer due to a huge reduction in smoking, which has nothing to do with their cancer treatments. Lying is their mode of operation.
As long as the official "war on cancer" is a HUGE BUSINESS based on expensive TREATMENTS (INTERVENTIONS) of a disease instead of its PREVENTION, logically, they will never find a cure for cancer. The upcoming moonshot-war on cancer inventions, too, will include industry-profitable gene therapies of cancer treatment that are right in line with the erroneous working model of mechanistic reductionism of allopathic medicine.
Practically all resources in the phony 'war on cancer' are poured into TREATMENT of cancer but almost none in the PREVENTION of the disease. It's proof positive that big money and a total lack of ethics rule the official medical establishment.
If the public were to scrutinize what the medical industry and its government pawns are telling them about the 'war on cancer' instead of blindly believing what they're saying, they'd find that the cancer industry and the cancer charities have been dismissing, ignoring, and obfuscating the true causes of cancer while mostly putting the blame for cancer on the individual, denying or dismissing the serious harms from orthodox cancer treatments and chemical toxicants, and resorting to deceptive cancer statistics to "educate" (think: mislead) the public that their way of treatment is actually successful --- read this well referenced scholarly article's ("A Mammogram Letter The British Medical Journal Censored") afterword on the war on cancer at https://www.rolf-hefti.com/mammogram.html (scroll down to the afterword that addresses the fraudulent 'war on cancer').
Does anyone really think it's a coincidence that double Nobel laureate Linus Pauling called the 'war on cancer' a fraud? If you look closer you'll come to the same conclusion. But...politics and self-serving interests of the conventional medical cartel, and their allied corporate media, keep the real truth far away from the public at large. Or people's own denial or indifference of the real truth.
Nice Information thanks for sharing In today’s time, installing a Privacy Fence Screen around your property is simple. Privacy fences block the view of one's home's windows and doors from prospective criminals who desire to accumulate access to your family and valuables. Most criminals are seeking an easy approach to induce in and out of one's property.
Post a Comment