Tuesday, October 26, 2021

Pentagon Says Al Qaeda And Islamic State In Afghanistan May Be Able to Attack The U.S. In Six Months

 

Daily Mail: Pentagon official warns that Islamic State in Afghanistan has the 'intent' to attack the U.S. and could have the capability to strike America in as little as six months from now 

* Pentagon figure says ISIS-K could have capability to attack US in 6 months 

* Under Secretary of Defense Colin Kahl gave his warning to senators on Tuesday 

* It came during a hearing on the US withdrawal from Afghanistan 

* Kahl also said Al Qaeda could have have the capability after a year 

* And he said both groups had the 'intent' to conduct operations against the US 

U.S. intelligence agencies believe the Islamic State in Afghanistan could develop the capability to attack the United States in as little as six months, a senior Pentagon official told senators on Tuesday. 

The stark warning is the latest reminder of the danger that remains after U.S. troops left the country at the end of August and the Taliban retook control. 

Under Secretary of Defense Colin Kahl said the U.S. had to remain vigilant against the threat from Al Qaeda and from the Islamic State's Afghanistan offshoot known as ISIS-K.  

Read more .... 

More News On The Pentagon Saying Al Qaeda And Islamic State In Afghanistan May Be Able to Attack The U.S. In Six Months 

 Islamic State in Afghanistan may be able to attack US in six months -- Reuters  

Terrorist groups in Afghanistan could launch international strikes within six months, officials warn -- Military Times

Islamic State in Afghanistan could have capacity to strike US next year -- The Guardian  

ISIS in Afghanistan Could Attack U.S. Within 6 Months: U.S. Intelligence -- US News and World Report  

Senior Pentagon official says ISIS-K could be capable of attacking US next year -- CNN  

Top Pentagon official confirms ISIS-K could have capability to attack US in '6 to 12 months' -- FOX News  

Terror Groups in Afghanistan Could Attack US Next Year, Pentagon Policy Chief Says -- Defense One

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

Are they for real? Much of the planning for 911 was done in Hamburg, Germany.

Anonymous said...

Speaking of scams…Who is Ray Epps? And why did he spend two days inciting Trump supporters to go inside the Capitol?

Informants watch and observe not instigate. They do not act as firebrands or incendiaries.


Jac said...

Well, thanks Biden.

Anonymous said...

Good luck with hearts, and minds if you have to go back in.

Left out to dry #

Anonymous said...

What 917 said, and the financing and people came mostly from Saudi Arabia

But let's attack Afghanistan, that country that destroyed armies from Alexander the great to Russia and let's stay there for 20 years almost to destroy your military morale and readiness and empty your pockets

Makes sense

Anonymous said...

Epps may or may not be an FBI dude but that hardly dismisses the 700 who tried to prevent the election results from being announced.
"but mommy. he told me to take the candy and i don't know who he is but i took it all"

Anonymous said...

Oh and let's ship the opium from Afghanistan to the US so Purdue pharma can kill as many Americans throug their opiate addiction like a small war would .

Then let these legalised drug dealers and mass murders walk free and let them do it again and again

Anonymous said...

731
Are for you real? "Epps may or may not"
Seriously?

Anonymous said...


"Epps may or may not be an FBI dude ..."

Epps directly influenced someone who was arrested. Read the fucking article cock sucker and that that dick out of your mouth to clear your air way to you can get some oxygen. FIB scrubbed its website of Epps pics. So yeah seriously, you craven fuck.


7:31 do you suck you boss off once a day or thrice a day to make him happy and keep you job?

Anonymous said...


Epps, the Arizona Oath Keeper President and FBI informant targets Ryan Samsel.

Foto `#16 scrubbed by FIB.

Anonymous said...


7:31 do you suck you boss off once a day or thrice a day to make him happy and keep you job?
don't have to. Your sist er give me head once a week

fred said...

Conservatives are hyping a new unfounded theory that once again shifts the blame for the Jan. 6 Capitol riot from supporters of President Donald Trump to the FBI.

In an 18,000-plus word article published on Monday, the independent blog Revolver attempts to suggest that a “Fed-Protected Provocateur” named Ray Epps is the true culprit behind the failed insurrection.

But the article, touted across social media by prominent right-wing figures, provides no actual concrete evidence for the claim and instead relies almost entirely on speculation.


in sum: more and more bullshit found here by trump sters

Anonymous said...

Blame is placed appropriately on Democrats and the FBI. The FBI and capitol police had many, many informants. They riled people up. The FBI director probably told Pelosi to refuse extra security that Trump wanted, so Pelosi did.

It would not shock me, if Wray did, considering all the other lawlessness by Brennan and Comey.


Fred, I appreciate how you made your argument truer, by printing in bold print. To make it truer still. you should have went all CAPS with bold font like you usually do.

Once again "All hat and no words" goes with another copy and paste.

1) Ryan Samsel is not free to tell us what Epps told him.

2) Epps is awfully quiet

3) Informant Epps did not go into the capitol, but he was outside. The FBI has been arresting people 2 blocks from the capitol building. As a the president of an Oath Keepers state chapter Epps would be prime arrest material since the FBI no longer is bound by the constitution.

Given 1,2, & 3 It is apparent that Epps is an informant.

Obviously, Fred has not red the link posted above or much of the daily dot link.

https://www.dailydot.com/debug/revolver-news-ray-epps-fbi/

If Fred had read the article, which would be heard for him to to do given his reading comprehension history, the timing of the photo disappearing would be hard to explain per the daily dot apologia.

By Fred's own admission he read below grade level through much of high school. It begs lots of questions. about what Fred learned, did not learn and whether the high school was engaged in social promotion.

How do you pass tests in math, science, social studies or any class, if you cannot read at grade level? My bet is that if you can't read at grade level, you do not crack a book to read at all. It brings into question test material. It must have been super easy.