Wednesday, October 26, 2022

Gallup Poll: US President Biden's Job Approval Back Down To 40%

Gallup: Biden Job Approval Back Down to 40% 

* 40% of Americans approve of job Joe Biden is doing as president 

* 81-point gap in Republican, Democratic ratings matches Biden average 

* Averaged 42% approval during seventh quarter in office 

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- President Joe Biden's job approval rating is 40%, a step down from the 44% measured in August but still above his term-low 38% from July. In all other months in 2022, his approval rating has been in the 40% to 42% range. The Oct. 3-20 survey finds 56% of Americans disapproving of Biden's performance, unchanged from September and midway between his highest (59% in July) and lowest (53% in August) disapproval scores this year.  

Read more ....  

WNU Editor: I expected a lower approval number.

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Biden's poll numbers are as high as they are for two reasons.

First, the Mar-a-Lago raid by the STASI err FIB on August 8th.

Second, because the MSM is worth 10 or 15 points due to propaganda or slanted poll taking methods.

"The media, I think, wants Kerry to win. And I think they’re going to portray Kerry and Edwards - I’m talking about the establishment media, not Fox, but - they’re going to portray Kerry and Edwards as being young and dynamic and optimistic and all, there’s going to be this glow about them that some, is going to be worth, collectively, the two of them, that’s going to be worth maybe 15 points.”

- Newsweek's assistant managing editor Evan Thomas

That statement was in 2004. It is just as true today.

However, all the propaganda in the world cannot stop Biden's downward slide in the polls unlike they did for Obama.

Anonymous said...

Russia is losing fast. Makes me wonder why they are still holding their Biden cards back. Biden is corrupt and the Chinese and Russians have the proof. What are they waiting for? the midterms to be over?

B.Poster said...

Since we aren't there at least I assume you aren't it's hard to "know" what's really happening. With that said we can apply common sense, carefully observe, and analyze multiple sources to try and ascertain what's happening.

When we do this, over time we will learn certain sources simply aren't trustworthy. Examples of untrustworthy sources are US (un)intelligence, the US leadership class, and their media surrogates. I'm contrast, other sources are generally trustworthy. Examples would be WNU Editor and his analysis. Over the years he's shown himself to be trustworthy.

Based upon my analysis O conclude Russia is not losing and anyone who tries to position themselves in such a manner is making a strategic error. Ad to why the Russians aren't exposing Biden, they're winning and don't want a change in US leadership. Biden and Democrats are viewed as weak. Republicans are ad well but not to the same extent. In contrast, thru respect and even fear former president Trump and don't want him as POTUS and likeky never did.

Anonymous said...

Liberal comic Jon Stewart says that Hunter Biden's $1 MILLION position on board of Ukrainian natural gas company Burisma was 'corruption - straight up off the bat'

The "author" always carps about Ukraine being corrupt. The first point is would Moscow and Washington have made the existing Ukrainian corruption worse? I am of the opinion that the answer is yes. The Washington elite washed a lot of foreign aid thru Ukraine back to their American bank accounts. I bet Russian hands are none to clean either.

Corrupt Elites Siphon Aid Money Intended For World’s Poorest

It stands to reason that if you are going to siphon your countries foreign aid to your bank account you have to give kick backs to people in country so they will not go to the press.

So did Washington make Ukraine corrupt or "moar" corrupt? I DEFINITELY believe the LATTER. Look the US helps Haiti all the time and the patient never gets well. It is profitable racket.

Who is more corrupt, Russia or Ukraine? Ukraine is 30 percent the size of Russian and Russia could not steam roll it as fast as NAZI German did Poland? Why? Does it call in to question that perhaps Ukraine was not more corrupt than Russia, but IT WIS THE OTHER WAY AROUND? Perhaps Ukraine has 1/3rd of the putative Russian standard of living, because Russia has so much oil wealth. PERIOD!

If Russia is so much less corrupt than Ukraine, how come mothballed Russian tanks have been so thoroughly stripped of parts? Maybe Putin and the other oligarchs were so busy they could not inspect their arms depots or at least have auditors or IG's inspect them. Too busy grifting I suppose.

The "author" always harped on the percentage of Russian speakers in Luhansk and Donetsk. what was conveniently not mentioned was that many of the Russian speakers are ethnic Ukrainians. So it appears that Donetsk and Luhansk do not have a majority of Russians after all.

In 17th or 18th centuries many Western Ukrainian nobility (Ruthenian) became Polonized in language. Should western Ukraine therefore be Polish? Is ethnic Ukrainians in Luhansk and Donetsk having Russian as their primary language justification enough for Russia to rule those provinces?

To my dismay many alternative news sites are against involvement in the Ukrainian-Russian War. IMO it is a war Russia must lose although I think Crimea should be Russian. What Khrushchev did in the 1950s was wrong. Also in 1991 Russia negotiated from a position of weakness and thus gave up Crimea on paper. China knows things like that as Unequal Treaties. It would behoove Ukraine to give Crimea back. But do to Russia's antics that shipped has sailed. I would still be for a plebiscite, but after so much genocide could such a plebiscite now be valid?

Anonymous said...

validity is found at the end of a gun-barrel.

Anonymous said...

1:02 AM is a funny guy quoting the vain Mao. Mao proved himself a clever gorilla. He achieved what we call a local maxima, so impressive that he feathered his own nest.

Due to his ministrations mankind might never live outside the solar system, but he had his harem. So life is good huh?

Anonymous said...

Lol if Russia is losing, what is Ukraine doing. Because they sure as H aren't ever winning

Anonymous said...

Izyum fell to Ukraine Izyum was the supply base for the great Russian northern pincer for the Donestk campaign.

So Russia or really Wagner is giving up on the pincers movement and are conducting head on attacks of Bakhmut. Someone crowed that Bakhmut was in Russian hands. they also claimed it was an important cross roads for the Ukrainian supply system. If a city is on the front lines, then it probably has not been a supply hub for some time. At any rate Wagner took the concrete factory in eastern Bakhmut and 48 hours later were thrown out. Wagner paymasters must have an easier job of late... unless widows come asking for back pay.

Without ample ammo stocks for artillery and/or regular Russian formations attacking, Russia is not going to take Bakhmut. That ship has sailed. Russia is being bled white at Bakmut by Yevgeny.

The maps show Ukraine edging close and closer to Kherson from the north.

So yes Ukraine is winning.


Remember those villages north of Kherson are nothing. They are just villages. They are just real estate.

they are just prime real estate to place artie to interdict regular Russian army troops or cannon fodder conscripts fleeing Kerson to the NE.

Better send lots of drones or have better counter battery fire than the Ukrainians. It is not like they are going to send Russian helos. Those are vanishing breed. Russians have lost 20% to 25% so far. At this rate Russia does not have to worry about China taking
Siberia. Even North Korea will be able to walk right in.