Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky speaks to Washington Post journalists in Kyiv on May 1. (Ed Ram for The Washington Post)
Antiwar.com: WaPo Deletes Portion of Zelensky Interview Where He Accuses Paper of Aiding Russia
The Ukrainian leader was angry about information revealed by a leaked document, saying sharing such info in Ukraine was a 'felony'
The Washington Post deleted a portion of an interview with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, where he accused the paper of helping Russia by posing a question about information contained in leaked classified documents.
The interview was conducted on May 1 and published on Saturday. An archived version of the interview shows a testy exchange between Zelensky and the Post, which was later deleted.
Read more ....
WNU Editor: Zelensky was pissed in the tract that the Washington Post deleted. And there is more. Including his commitment to cancel upcoming elections.
The tract that the Washington Post deleted can be read from (of all places) Russia's RT .... Here are the Zelensky ‘treason’ quotes the Washington Post deleted (RT). The
Washington Post article is here .... Zelensky interview transcript: ‘Ukraine must win’ (Washington Post).
Update: The Washington Post has restored the excerpt of the interview that was deleted earlier
4 comments:
WaPo = political activists. No journalism there, just brainwash and covering their asses
Still busy spewing the party line
the wapo has smeared a previously elected president as russian asset, manipulating the following election
the wapo also engaged in suppression polling, in which they portrayed trump as behind by double digits
to me, that's enough for long term prison sentences. I have had it with these ghouls that interfer in the democratic process and then side with deep state terrorists who wish to tear america apart
hang them all. I don't care. wapo is a bunch of activists engaged in election meddling.
poor poor readers!
first the dislike the paper.
then it is used here to show how the paper pub info that Ukraine preferred not be made public.
then the paper dismissed the Ukraine bitching as irrelevant to their journalistic notions.
then readers here attacked the paper as irrelevant to any and all things.
question: why publish anything from a paper readers here dislike and dismiss? Why not stick to anon Zero Hedge?
Main stream media constantly published at this site and readers constantly dismiss what in MSM they find does not match their "needs."
Post a Comment