354-53: House passed a resolution "declaring it is the policy of the U.S. that a nuclear Islamic Republic of Iran is not acceptable...and to use all means necessary to prevent Iran 4 from obtaining a nuclear weapon." 3 Republicans & 50 Democrats voted No.https://t.co/SG74L2UwWp pic.twitter.com/1v68826FyC
— Craig Caplan (@CraigCaplan) November 1, 2023
WNU Editor: Congresswoman Elise Stefanik and Congressman McCaul have been successful in having their resolution passed that declares it is now the policy of the United States that a nuclear Iran is unacceptable.
Congresswoman Elise Stefanik was blunt in her statement (link here) ....
.... Iran continues to expand its nuclear capabilities by enriching and stockpiling weapons grade uranium for the use of developing nuclear weapons. Following President Trump’s withdrawal from the flawed Obama-era Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), President Biden actively pursued a new and worse nuclear deal with Iran. This resolution details Iran’s disregard for limitations on its nuclear program set by international bodies and recent estimations of Iran’s nuclear capabilities.
“Joe Biden's desperate attempts to return to the era of Obama’s failed nuclear deal is an embarrassment. Promoting a strategy of appeasement towards Iran has allowed Tehran to advance their nuclear capabilities and decrease their breakout time for establishing a nuclear weapon,” stated Congresswoman Elise Stefanik. “While the Iranian regime props up Hamas and terrorist proxies in the Middle East whose stated objectives are to destroy our greatest ally, Israel, it has never been more crucial to ensure that Iran, the largest state sponsor of terrorism, does not have access to a nuclear weapon. A nuclear Iran is completely unacceptable. I am proud to lead this resolution to unequivocally stand against Iranian aggression and support the use of all means available to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.”
Bottom line.
If this resolution is signed by President Biden, the US government will then have the legal authority to wage war against Iran over its nuclear program. This story is not receiving the attention from the US media that it should.
6 comments:
saying something is not acceptable is not the same as saying we will go to war to prevent it.
What 4:32 says is true.
I am not sure what to make of it on 1st glance. Second thought was that it is grandstanding for the election. Third thought is that it prevents or make politically dangerous for Biden to try to revive the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action for his Sith Master Obama.
The Sith Lord does not care what happens to his tool. Biden might veto the bill and continue to send his clowns Blinken, Kerry and others to negotiate with Iran.
About "We will go to war". We are already in a war with Iran through proxies and by hybrid warfare.
We all know this except for donkeys that reflexively pull the lever for anything with a (D) behind its name. And some repubs.
It is why WNU and most everyone else at this site believes in the phrase "You might not be interested in war, but war is interested in you."
We are already at war with Iran and militias they support have killed Americans. American Political Pharisees might claim that no American soldiers have been killed, so we need to do very little if anything at all besides a few underwhelmingly disproportionate air strikes.
The above comment is correct. The political system itself is in need of cleansing.
Clean the system? gop way, ie stor, the Capitol? Proud Boys?
The GOP way was to add 10,000 national guardsmen to ward off any problems.
The Nancy Pelosi Democrat way was to insert FBI agents in the crowd and incite it.
Funny, but the FBI the premier bomb investigation agency cannot or will not told us who planted bombs by DNC and GOP political offices.
The video of the bomber which was released is grainy. But there is bond to be other video form other business or building as he walked to the bomb site. You can back track the bombers path back to a car or a building. It is not guaranteed, but it is probable. there is bound to be lots of cameras in DC. Maybe not as much as London or any other British Bedlam, but here are bound to be plenty.
Somehow the FBI is not interested.
Why?
Put this way 6:17/asswipe, intersection cameras at intersection that were mainly put there in the last 1 or 2 decades are mainly to analyze crashes to acsertain liability and to improve the roadways (traffic engineers). Those same cameras are getting better and in some places can read plates as well although was not their initial primary purpose.
It means that tag reading cameras are ubiquitous.
If the bomber did not use a car, then maybe he used the subway. There should be footage.
If the bomber passed an ATM there is a profile three quarters or full on shot of him.
The reason the bomber was not caught was in all likelihood the bomber was working for the FBI or other Feds.
Let's put it this way. It would be easier to name or list places without cameras especially in DC.
But no one caught.
6:17,
No the Democrat, way with ANTIFA and BLM causing more casualties and destruction than any event in this country's history outside of actual war and natural disasters and terrorizing the country an entire summer, unfettered illegal immigration through 99.8% of the border numbering in the tens of millions, 3 masks to wear and 9 vaccines to take, massive government unfunded liabilities and spending that "will pay for itself", social marxism and absolute degeneracy as public policy, historical violent crime enabled entirely by democrat judicial policy, a president with Alzheimer's and an undeniable history of very bad corruption, a failed public education system churning out shitheads that is almost entirely democrat administered and reflective of their own politics, actual open hate and racism; not the Jesse Smollett or Bubu Wallace made up bullshit that you live for, mass child butchery and murder, mental health pill popping fuckery and drug use even in the white house itself, the greatest potentials for WW3 in decades and a touch of glitter and female penis's.
You dumb bitch. More deepthroating noises and partisan bootlicking from Child Pred Fred Lapides or his anon lapdogs.
Let it be the Constitutional Republic as explicitly outlined in the constitution. Anything beyond that, the government has exceeded its mandate and is illegitimate; left or right. If you cant get behind that and want more government then just go die in a car fire.
Turd.
Post a Comment