Friday, January 12, 2024

Russia's Medvedev Says Any Deployment Of UK Troops To Ukraine Would Be A Declaration Of War

FILE PHOTO: Deputy head of the Russian Security Council Dmitry Medvedev. © Sputnik/Ekaterina Shtukina 

 RT: British troops in Ukraine would be ‘declaration of war’ – Medvedev 

The former Russian president was reacting to the imminent signing of a security agreement between London and Kiev Moscow would consider the open deployment of British troops to Ukraine as a “declaration of war,” former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev has warned. 

He was responding to a visit to Kiev on Friday by UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, who is set to sign a security agreement with Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky.  

Read more .... 

Russia's Medvedev Says Any Deployment Of UK Troops To Ukraine Would Be A Declaration Of War  

Russia's Medvedev Says Any UK Troop Deployment to Ukraine Would Be a Declaration of War -- Reuters  

Russia warns UK that troop deployment in Ukraine would be 'declaration of war' -- FOX News  

Putin ally makes thinly-veiled threat to bomb Rishi Sunak with 'cluster munitions' during PM's surprise Kyiv visit - and warns 'arrogant British' deploying troops in Ukraine would be a 'declaration of war' against Russia -- Daily Mail  

Putin Ally Makes Ominous Nuclear Threat - Russia -- Newsweek

36 comments:

Anonymous said...

Would that be consider a war with NATO then?

Anonymous said...

I really hope the Brits keep out of it they should first clean their own backyard which of late has basically become a cesspoolk of criminal activity

Caecus said...

it's surprising that during this war Putin has been almost a recluse, only appearing to make boring speeches about the economy, while Medvedev keeps producing tweets about red lines and nuclear war

Anonymous said...

The UK has an army?

Anonymous said...

What if the Brits sent drill sergeants and other trainers to Ukraine well behind the front lines?

What would be wrong with that?

Russia is not at war. Russia never declared war. Russia is engaged in a special military operation. Special as in "isn't that special?!" Special as in Elmer Fudd or Medvedev.

Russia needs to be put away the same way NAZI Germany needed to be put away after the invasion of Czechoslovakia.

NAZI Germany and Russia are alike in many ways. Let's start with both goose step and go from there.


Anonymous said...


Russian Kremlin Guards goose-stepping at slow march at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier, Moscow.

Anonymous said...

Pathetic fool.

Anonymous said...

Hell hath no fury like a baited bear

Anonymous said...

Russia has come up with a brand new, novel reactive armor. Russians

I should say the blogger is double or triple thickness reactive armor.

Anonymous said...

the brits are looking to get their collective arse kicked.

Any way, this is all bs. the SAS and SBS has been running ops in ukie land for the last 2 years. Who do you think planned and led all those river crossing ops last year.

Anonymous said...

Yeah the ukies are stupid. They could not plan their way out of a wet paper bag. The ukies are so stupid half the of the old Soviet arsenal was in Ukraine.

Anonymous said...

American IFV takes out a Russian T-90 tank. Sad

Good thing the Russians paid The Big Guy not to send more than 200.

Bradley has a 25 mm chain gun

T-190 has 125 mm smoothbore.


25 versus 125

1 to 5

In fairness the Russian never got off a shot. They were busy
Ménage à trois

Anonymous said...

Russian Telegram groups waking up to the fact that Putin will feed every man in Russia into his Ukrainian corpsegrinder and it totally doesn't matter.

Anonymous said...

gee drone takes out leopard, abrams cannot even make it out of the staging area because the motor does not work.

Bradleys are wearing out, just like the ukie artillery tubes.

Ukies are losing on a daily basis..
jack ass uses small examples of Russian failer when the big picture is that the corrupt ukies have doomed themselves.

Anonymous said...

Someone should explain to Medvedev it would just be a special military operation. Then he'd realize it'd be alright.

Chris

Anonymous said...

10 Ways Britain Has Ruined the World

10 Apartheid
9 Irish Potato Famine
8 Invention of the Machine Gun
7. Atlantic Slave Trade
6 Opium Wars with China
5 Colonization of Africa
4 Appeasement of Adolph Hitler
3 The Industrial Revolution
2 Partition of Palestine
1. Partition of India

https://listverse.com/2013/03/12/10-ways-britain-has-ruined-the-world/

After all the damage, the Brittish are now a bunch of drunk, tattooed footballers who won't work, so Brittan must bring in migrants to work.

Ron said...

Nato's article 5 does not mean absolutely another member should take military action in support. the article says if the other member is a "victim of attack" they should support that member in some way. So, if the Brits send troops to Ukraine and Russia attacks these troops in Ukie land, does that mean the Brits are a "victim of attack". If the Brits attack Russia first and Russia strikes back, does that mean the Brits are a "Victim of attack?" I believe the USA misleaders would use that as the excuse they need to engage Russia. However, other NATO members might resent that the Brits dragged them into a world war they do not want. If this plays out, it might be the end of NATO. Let's see how stupid the poorly armed and prepared Brits are. And which countries follow them into hell.

Anonymous said...



And I concur with your post, to put it another way.


Your interpretation of Article 5 is correct.

But that will not stop someone in the American ruling blob from interpreting it in their own "unique" way to justify what ever they want to do.

The US would go to war in a heartbeat to pull the Brits ass out of the fire.

Also, The Brits would mot have done this with out consulting, agreement and consent with the USA.

The web leading to war gets tighter every month.

Anonymous said...

Britain ruined the world?
you would not have an industrial revolution but prefer to sheep herding?
Britain turned over Palestine's lands to UN, who partitioned it and before that Ottoman Empire had it...you blame the wrong group.
Britain hardly the only nation traded in slavery. Columbus got the ball rolling.
et etc
you need to do some reading

Anonymous said...

abandon all hope ye who enter here

Anonymous said...

Lol

Anonymous said...

4 Appeasement of Adolph Hitler

Yep... Appeasment was a mistake. I'm just glad the US stepped up and fought the Nazis alone for a couple of years before the Brits got round to doing the decent thing... Wait a sec

Poor, dumb vatniks cannot get anything right

7. Atlantic Slave Trade
The English did not start it. The Spanish and the Portuguese beat them to it. Before the Atlantic Trade there was the Arab slave trade in Africa long before the Atlantic one.

"The Portuguese, in the 16th century, were the first to buy slaves from West African slavers and transport them across the Atlantic. In 1526, they completed the first transatlantic slave voyage to Brazil, and other Europeans soon followed."

Of course the Russians were not in the slave trade, because St Petersburg was not well situated. And well why? After all the Russian elite treated the common man like a slave. So no need.

The only ones that hold weight are 6 & 9. With the Famine there were relief efforts by some in London.

Apartheid was a local things against the wishes of the British Govenment

"Broadly speaking, apartheid was delineated into petty apartheid, which entailed the segregation of public facilities and social events, and grand apartheid, which dictated housing and employment opportunities by race.[9] The first apartheid law was the Prohibition of Mixed Marriages Act, 1949, followed closely by the Immorality Amendment Act of 1950, which made it illegal for most South African citizens to marry or pursue sexual relationships across racial lines.[10] The Population Registration Act, 1950"


I do blame the British for the Opium Wars. What Russia doing at that time? They were not selling drugs. They were stealing Chinese land. Might makes right. Very Russian


Anonymous said...

Industrial Revolution it was said almost happened in the time of Henry II or Henry III.

So what is The Industrial Revolution except an industrial revolution?

We did the industrial revolution not come about in King Henry's reign.

The Chinese were very advanced. Why did the industrial revolution not happen during the Song or Ming Dynasties?

According to Marxism, the industrial revolution was bound to happen somewhere. The revolution is like calculus or scientific theories. It just wells up.

Freaking Russians do not know Marxist theory. Sad. Marx was 1/2 right. Half right at least in his exposition in 1st half of Das Capital.

Anonymous said...

Gt Britain had an empire...a lot of things came from that fact.
Rome had one too
And Greece was mighty at one time
And the Spanish and the Dutch etc etc
and so you settle on one nation as though that accounts for all of human history or its mistakes?

Anonymous said...

Yes, the vatnik settled on one country because it is the enemy de jure and for no other reason.

Vatnik was being lazy.


"'X' had an empire...a lot of things came from that fact. "

Very well stated. Pithy/concise

Eminently worth copying.

Anonymous said...

Empire

Often they are due to conquest. Maybe not always. I read or saw a documentary where there were instances where the Persian empire spread through engineering (waterworks) and not always warfare. Trying to look up that source material for the future.

Sichuan waterworks are impressive. The Area was already conquered. the impressive part is a Chinese bureaucrat/engineer made it into a breadbasket through irrigation and flood control. Better yet they are idiot proof. The CCCP could not screw it up.

Looking up the Atlantic slave trade for the nth time I ran across where the 1st Atlantic slave traders, the Portuguese, got their asses kicked around the natives of Guinea-Bissau in naval warfare. So they settled on buying slaves from African rulers.

That is the thing fucking vatniks and fucking liberals do not care to admit. The slave trade was not possible without the African slavers being involved for most of the time.

Anonymous said...

Russian authorities are cutting off heating in prisons so that prisoners go to fight in Ukraine, — BILD.

Temperatures have dropped to -35°C in many parts of Russia. It seems that Vladimir Putin has decided to use the cold weather to replenish his weakened troops in Ukraine. Many colonies are turning off the heating so that prisoners are more willing to go to war.

"For this reason, they just cut off the heating for them at below zero temperatures," — said Olga Romanova, founder of the Sitting Rus project; "By doing so, the conditions in prisons must become unbearable so that the men there would go to Ukraine. <...> There are three groups in Russia for whom most people have no compassion when they die at the front. They are prisoners, [national] minorities living in poor regions far from Moscow and new citizens. As long as these three groups are fighting and dying in Ukraine, Putin can create the illusion of normality for the rest. <...> Overall, the success of the prisoner units is quite limited, as we can also see from current events on the front. <...> Prisoners are simply sent en masse to the front line in Ukraine and sacrificed there."

According to Romanova, women from Russian prisons are being recruited more and more often. Currently, about 1,000 Russian women are fighting in Ukraine.

Anonymous said...

You are smoking dope again.

Tell jay in Kiev to get his stories straight.

It s the ukies emptying prisons and do not forget the orphanages.

You are a dumb ass.

You do not see any dead Russian women in the trenches , but you do see those poor Ukrainian girls there. What a bunch of Sickos their leaders are.

And you, my Fd up idiot at 721 , are even sicker for supporting these degenerates.

Anonymous said...

Tired of these Russian dictators. Kill’em all

Anonymous said...

1017

you too are part of the sicko gang.

Hans Persson said...

Bla bla bla. Yeah they took Ukraine in 2 days. No. Whatever the bear, it's obviously handicapped.

Anonymous said...

He was. He is learning, although slowly.

So you have to ask. Who is in better shape?

The Russians or NATO.?


NATO has serious manpower and armament production problems which they are in no hurry to fix.


The ruskies now have had the opportunity to fix their weapons, force structure and war fighting methods.

This war will leave the Russians better prepared for anything NATO will throw at them in the future.

Anonymous said...

You have not changed much in 6 years. you are still engaged in the psychological mind fuck to brow beat people into submission in discussion threads, so the field s clear for you top set the table,

You did learn spacing however. You have that in common with Barack Obama. He learned how to pause and slow hos speech for effect. You have a lot in common with that worthless fuck.

Anonymous said...

Doing fine dimwit.

You still cannot get over the fact that the Whole NATO USA, two year news-cycle of: "the ukies are winning, Russia has lost" was one big blobber / MSM..... lie.

Like the sucker You are, you were fooled again by the TPTB propaganda machine. You still refuse to accept the fact that DC is the home of the UNI Party.

Democrat vs republican is all a lie. They are just different faces on the same card.


I will keep on telling you the truth, and I fully expect you NOT to listen.

Then , Once again, with the passage of time,

you find out,

I was right and ......

The blob

Lied to you


AGAIN

Anonymous said...

A-50

Anonymous said...

bombed cities, mariupol, bakhmut, adveeka, krinky, robotyne....no industrial production.