Showing posts with label anti-terror laws. Show all posts
Showing posts with label anti-terror laws. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 8, 2013

Captured Al-Qaeda Mastermind Behind the Embassy Bombings Will Be Read His Miranda Rights



Miranda Rights Waived For Suspected al Qaeda Operative Abu Anas al-Libi -- Washington Times

U.S. authorities will interrogate suspected al Qaeda operative Abu Anas al-Libi aboard an American warship without reading him his rights, officials said Monday.

Al-Libi was captured from the streets of the Libyan capital of Tripoli in a U.S. military raid over the weekend. He will be in military custody for several more days or weeks aboard the USS San Antonio in the Mediterranean Sea, NBC News reported.

U.S. officials hope to get information about al Qaeda’s operations in Libya, but none of what al-Libi says can be used in a trial. The FBI could read him his Miranda rights later and seek to question him again, the report said.

Read more ....

My Comment: By not reading Abu Anas al-Libi his Miranda rights they are hoping that he will then "spill the beans" on Al Qaeda's operations in Libya knowing that such information can then not be used against him in his court case. This is unreal .... how can this foreign terrorist have any rights under the U.S. legal system? Sighhh .... I guess this is now standard U.S. policy on how they should conduct counter-terrorism operations. But here is an easy prediction .... Abu Anas al-Libi is going to plead that he is innocent, and he will give them zero intel.

Tuesday, February 26, 2013

U.S. Supreme Court Blocks Lawsuit On Foreign Intelligence Surveillance

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan walks back into the Supreme Court building with Chief Justice of the United States John Roberts after her investiture ceremony in Washington (Larry Downing Reuters, REUTERS / February 26, 2013)

Supreme Court Blocks Challenge To Anti-Terrorism Law -- USA Today

Court's conservatives deny lawyers, journalists and human rights activists the right to challenge the law because of the fear of future surveillance or the costs of guarding against it.

WASHINGTON -- One of the most controversial anti-terrorism laws passed in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks may be beyond normal judicial review, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Tuesday.

In a 5-4 decision, the court's conservative justices ruled that lawyers, journalists, human rights activists and others lacked standing to challenge a law passed in 2008 that increases the government's ability to intercept international communications.

Read more ....

More News On The U.S. Supreme Court Blocking Challenges To Current Surveillance Laws

US court won't allow challenge to surveillance law -- FOX News/AP
Supreme Court Rejects Challenge to Surveillance Law -- New York Times
Supreme Court throws out challenge to surveillance law -- Reuters
Supreme Court blocks challenge to federal wiretapping program -- The Hill
High Court Rejects Challenge to U.S. Surveillance Program -- Wall Street Journal
Wiretapping-Law Challenges Barred by U.S. Supreme Court -- Bloomberg
Supreme Court Thwarts Challenge to Warrantless Surveillance -- Threat Level

Sunday, August 26, 2012

Convicted Al-Qaeda Terrorists Appeal To The European Court Of Human Rights


Al-Qaeda Terrorists Launch Human Rights Bid -- The Telegraph

Two Al-Qaeda terrorists, one of whom plotted to kill thousands of people in a bomb attack on a British shopping centre, have launched an attempt to have their convictions quashed on human rights grounds.

The pair have applied to the European Court of Human Rights after claiming MI5 was complicit in their torture by Pakistani security services, a claim that has already been rejected by British courts.

Officials at the European Court have allowed their application to go ahead rather than declaring it inadmissible, as they do with thousands of cases a year.

Read more
....

My Comment
: More taxpayer monies being spent to keep convicted Al Qaeda terrorists in jail .... what a waste.

Thursday, October 13, 2011

David Barron Signed Anwar al-Awlaki’s Death Warrant. Who Is David Barron?

Who Signed Anwar al-Awlaki’s Death Warrant? -- Richard Cohen, Washington Post

Who the hell is David Barron?

Wikipedia says that name may refer to a British film producer, a soccer player, an actor or a sportswriter. Google says he could be a hairstylist in Atlanta. None of these, though, is the David Barron I have in mind. The one I want is the one who signed off on the killing of Anwar al-Awlaki, a very bad guy but, still, an American citizen. Barron was a U.S. government lawyer.

Never heard of him? Me neither. But according to published reports, he was one of two lawyers in the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel — the other was Martin Lederman — who in 2010 composed an approximately 50-page memo saying it was legally permissible to kill Awlaki even though he was a U.S. citizen and had not been convicted of so much as a traffic violation.

Read more ....

My Comment: I admit .... when I first heard about the killing of Anwar al-Awlaki .... I was happy to know that he was now dead. But now .... a week later .... some small doubts are starting to come in. He was after-all an American citizen, and his assassination by the US government now opens a Pandora's box of how far will the US government now go against it's own citizens without due legal process. In the case of Anwar al-Awlaki .... it is clear that they will go all the way.

Americans May Lose Their Citizenship If They Support Terrorism Abroad

Photo: Anwar al-Awlaqi - AFP (File Photo)

Bill Introduced To Strip Citizenship Of Americans Supporting Terror Abroad -- Daily Caller

A new bill introduced by Connecticut independent Sen. Joe Lieberman and several other members of Congress would strip the citizenship of Americans deemed by the government to be involved in terrorism.

Lieberman introduced the “Enemy Expatriation Act” Wednesday with Massachusetts Republican Sen. Scott Brown, Pennsylvania Republican Rep. Charlie Dent and Pennsylvania Democratic Rep. Jason Altmire. The legislation would update federal law to revoke the citizenship of Americans involved in terrorism.

Read more
....

Update #1: Terror backers should lose US citizenship: lawmakers -- AFP
Update #2: Lawmakers seek to strip citizenship from people supporting terrorism against U.S. -- The Hill

My Comment: Will President Obama sign this bill? .... probably .... at least to remedy the legal challenges that presently exist in this grey area of the law.

Tuesday, October 11, 2011

Al Qaeda is Concerned About The Law?

Anwar al-Awlaqi - AFP (File Photo)

Al-Qaeda Joins Those Questioning Legality Of U.S. Killing Of Citizen Anwar al-Awlaki -- Washington Post

Al-Qaeda’s affiliate in Yemen has confirmed the deaths of American-born cleric Anwar al-Awlaki and Samir Khan, the young American propagandist killed alongside him in a U.S. drone strike late last month.

Al-Qaeda has also criticized the Obama administration for killing U.S. citizens, saying doing so “contradicts” American law.

“Where are what they keep talking about regarding freedom, justice, human rights and respect of freedoms?!” the statement says, according to a translation by SITE Intelligence Group, which monitors jihadist Web sites.

Read more
....

My Comment: Talk about chutzpa .... especially since they openly support kangaroo courts that are brutal in enforcing Islamic law.

Monday, June 21, 2010

U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Anti-Terror Laws

Supreme Court Upholds Antiterror Law -- Wall Street Journal

WASHINGTON—The Supreme Court upheld a federal law banning "material support" for foreign terrorist organizations, rejecting challenges that the measure was so broad as to impinge on U.S. citizens' First Amendment rights of free speech and association.

The vote was 6-3, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority, joined by four other conservatives and liberal Justice John Paul Stevens. Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor and Stephen Breyer dissented.

Read more ....

More News On The Supreme Court Upholding Anti-Terror Laws

High court upholds anti-terror law -- AP
Supreme Court Affirms Ban on Aiding Groups Tied to Terror -- New York Times
High Court: Americans Can’t Help Terrorists -- FOX News
Supreme Court upholds ban on 'material support' to foreign terrorist groups -- USA Today
Court Upholds Law That Prohibits 'Material Support' To Terrorist Groups -- NPR
Court upholds law barring aid to terror groups -- The Hill