Tuesday, November 15, 2011

Commentaries, Opinions, And Editorials -- November 15, 2011


Before We Bomb Iran, Let’s Have a Serious Conversation -- John H. Johns, New York Times

It is common for candidates in presidential primaries to use bellicose language to prove their toughness. This kind of rhetoric is especially useful in Republican primaries, where audiences have a firm belief in the use of military power to solve problems. But toughness and wisdom are not the same thing.

The difference between the two was on display in the discussion of Iran that opened Saturday night’s Republican foreign policy debate, as it has been throughout the Republican campaign. Asked if he would consider a military option should current efforts fail to deter Iran’s work on developing nuclear weapons, Mitt Romney said, “of course you take military action, it’s unacceptable for Iran to have a nuclear weapon.”

Read more ....

Commentaries, Opinions, And Editorials

The Haqqani Network and the Threat to Afghanistan: Why the Terrorist Syndicate is the Biggest Threat to South Asia -- Jeffrey Dressler, Foreign Affairs

Turning the screw on Assad’s ailing regime -- The Telegraph editorial

Isolating Syria's Assad -- L.A. Times editorial

Iraq's federalist project reflects a resurgent sectarian conflict -- Reidar Visser, The National

Is South Korea Headed for Trouble? -- Michael Auslin, Real Clear World

China Furthers Washington's Cause in the South Sea
-- Amitai Etzioni, National Interest

China: We hate Americans -- Brett M. Decker and William C. Triplett II, The Washington Times

China roils not-so-pacific Pacific: Obama’s promise to check expansionary PRC greeted with skepticism -- Frank J. Gaffney Jr., The Washington Times

Africa Rising: Could a shared currency in East Africa avoid the euro's woes?
-- Max Delany, Christian Science Monitor

And Watch for the Door when You Leave: A Personal Farewell to Berlusconi -- Jeff Israely, Time

Focus on foreign policy: Candidates need to tell voters how they will keep America safe -- Ed Feulner, The Washington Times

Could we meet the eyes of the fallen? -- Telegraph editorial

No comments: