Saturday, February 18, 2012

Commentaries, Opinions, And Editorials -- February 18, 2012



Is Iran Serious About Nuclear Talks? West Wants Guarantees This Time. -- Howard LaFranchi, Christian Science Monitor

Iran says it is willing to talk about its nuclear program. But with signs that sanctions are taking a toll on Tehran, the West thinks it has the upper hand – and wants proof that Iran is serious.

Western officials, repeatedly burned by Iran's pattern of accepting talks over its nuclear program only to buy time for further progress in uranium enrichment, are insisting upon guarantees that Iran is serious this time around.

Read more ....

Commentaries, Opinions, And Editorials

Should the US attack Iran? Monitor Facebook fans speak out. -- Christian Science Monitor

Why the Egyptian Military Fears a Captains' Revolt -- Patrick Galey, Foreign Policy

Pakistan and Osama bin Laden -- David Ignatius, Washington Post

Islamists’ Ideas on Democracy and Faith Face Test in Tunisia -- Anthony Shadid, New York Times

A fatal tweet. Young Saudi man faces execution for Muhammad comments -- Washington Times editorial

A long march: The moderate Islamists of the Muslim Brotherhood have won much ground but look far from comfortable in power -- The Economist

Where China Isn't Winning -- David Lundquist, The National Interest

Vatican Confidential: Why Are So Many Rumors Coming out of the Holy See? -- Stephan Faris, Time

Will 2012 be the Year of the African Despot, again? -- Scott Baldauf, Christian Science Monitor

Evidence points to Mugabe as world's most destructive leader -- Joel Brinkley, Chicago Tribune

Europe’s Failed Course
-- New York Times editorial

Medvedev’s Foreign Policy: Period of Stabilization -- Fyodor Lukyanov, Russia In Global Affairs

Some lies around Deep Throat exposed -- Glenn Garvin, McClatchy News/The Miami Herald

Putting national security at risk. Deep cuts encourage our foes to test our defenses -- James Jay Carafano, The Washington Times

Preserving our nuclear deterrence -- Bradley A. Thayer, The Washington Times

No comments: