Thursday, June 11, 2015

Poll: Nato Publics Are Reluctant To Use Force To Protect Member States


PEW Research:
NATO Publics Blame Russia for Ukrainian Crisis, but Reluctant to Provide Military Aid

In Russia, Anti-Western Views and Support for Putin Surge

Publics of key member nations of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) blame Russia for the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. Many also see Russia as a military threat to other neighboring states. But few support sending arms to Ukraine. Moreover, at least half of Germans, French and Italians say their country should not use military force to defend a NATO ally if attacked by Russia.

A median of 39% among NATO publics say Russia is the main culprit in the ongoing conflict in eastern Ukraine. The pro-Russian separatists in Luhans’k and Donets’k (18%) are a distant second. Half say Russia is a major military threat to other neighboring nations. In response to the crisis, 70% among allied countries say Western countries should send economic aid to Ukraine. A majority (57%) also supports Ukraine becoming a member of NATO.


More News On The Pew Research Polling Results On NATO - Russian Relations

Key findings from our poll on the Russia-Ukraine conflict -- PEW Research
NATO Public Opinion: Wary of Russia, Leery of Action on Ukraine -- PEW Research
Poll finds Nato's Europeans wary of Russia confrontation -- BBC
Survey: Western Europe wary of supporting Russia’s NATO neighbors -- Washington Post
Survey Points to Challenges NATO Faces Over Russia -- NYT
Pew Research study: Western Europeans wary of NATO's capability -- UPI
Baltic Nations Have Reason to Worry Over Russia's Aggression -- Bloomberg
This chart should terrify Russia's neighbors -- Max Fisher, VOX
For Europe’s NATO allies, attack on one isn’t attack on all -- Politico
Survey: NATO countries see America as shield to Russian threat -- USA Today
Poll: Russians Dislike West About as Much as Westerners Dislike Russia -- Moscow Times
Europeans Reject War; Would Prefer US Just Do the Job For Them -- Kevin Drum, Mother Jones

No comments: