Why would some "concerned citizen" suddenly leak information to ABC that Jeff Sessions was under investigation for perjuring himself (about Russia, of course) during his confirmation hearing now almost a year behind us?
Could it have something to do with the fact that the man who instigated that investigation was none other than Andrew McCabe, only recently fired by Sessions? Was someone or some group -- the ABC report specifies "sources" with an "s" -- trying to make the attorney general's act seem one of revenge, and thus illegitimate?
No doubt. But the problem is that Sessions was long ago exonerated of this charge by none other than Robert Mueller.
Read more ....
WNU editor: Roger Simon is using an anonymous Internet character with the moniker @NameRedacted7 as proof that those who run Washington are in deep trouble. I personally hate anonymous sources .... but I will admit that whoever @NameRedacted7 is, his (or hers) recent thread that sumamrizes what is happening in Washingon is an interesting read .... Unrolled thread from @NameRedacted7. And while I do not know if this thread is accurate, I do know that many are now openly questioning many of the assessments and conclusions that the U.S. intelligence community have made in the past year and a half .... House Intel Republicans think there's something wrong with Trump-Russia intelligence community assessment (Byron York), and that the groundwork is probably being laid for an independent investigation on the justice and intelligence community at a later date. Case in point .... I think everyone is now worried on what the Justice Department's Inspector General is doing .... Bombshell reveal: A grand jury already is hearing evidence on DOJ and FBI scandals (Thomas Lifson, American Thinker). And unlike the Mueller Counsel that is focused on finding evidence of collusion/crimes/etc, the firing of the FBI Deputy Director gave all of us a heads-up that Inspector General already has a lot of evidence that he can use .... and he is using it.
Update: Why am I now surprised that former MI6 agent Christopher Steele is expected to confirm he did nothing to confirm some of the allegations in his Russian dossier .... UK court documents reveal details about Christopher Steele's dossier deposition (FOX News).
7 comments:
Anonymous source: I've seen Trump eat a baby, alive!!
Democrat: Holy shit, I knew it
Republican: Did he say anything about taxes while eating that particular baby in question?
Anon,
What is wrong with eating a baby alive?
Seriously, what is wrong with it?
Democrats do not consider babies as humans or as people. They consider them "unviable tissue masses".
If we go according to Democrat passed laws, liberal sensibilities, and Leftist theologians, it should be perfectly okay to eat babies. Democrat undergrads and Democrat PhDs in philosophy (ethicists) have said it is right and meet to kill kids up to 2 or 3 years of age.
Given Democrat rules and Democrat practice your joke makes no sense and is not funny, but you are hilarious.
Besides it would not surprise me if Planned Parenthood opened up a chain of sushi restaurant.
Blah blah blah as usual
where has anyone in our nation ever said it ok to kill kids up to 3 years old? how phucking dumb can you get?
Fred,
I think someone has said if you are white the best thing you can do is kill yourself. I think we can infer that refers to babies as well.
With that said, that is getting off topic. Many are now openly questioning the assessments of the US Intelligence Community. I've been pointed out the fact that these are incompetent boobs and political hacks since at least the Grenada experience for the US military, further confirmed by the Panama Experience, the cake of 911, the icing of the Saddam's WMD not being "there" meaning where we thought it would be, and the list could go on. Instead of owning up to their mistakes and working to improve as adults do, they chose with media complicity to hand GWB and his team out to dry.
I'm pleased that some are finally catching on. It's taken long enough but better late than never I suppose. Perhaps we can FINALLY begin to address this problem.
The solution I suggested after 911 and again after Iraq was to treat it like certain blood cancers where the entire system is destroyed and replaced with a new one. During the process we could have turned to allies such as Israel, Great Britain, France, and Germany to provide us with the intelligence we needed and to help us construct competent intelligence services.
In fairness to these incompetent boobs, they along with the military have often been asked to "punch above our weight." When this is done, mistakes are bound to happen. As a soldier, one is expected to "soldier on." Other than the generals these people don't have access to the military. With the generals even this is limited. With the (un)Intelligence community, no limits. The fact that none of these people spoke up says a great deal of what we need to know about them and their lack of character/wisdom. I think you can sum them up by "to stupid to know you are stupid." It reminds me of a 7th grade boy.
Needless to say I hold them in utter contempt and am pleased to see that some are FINALLY catching on. I am slowly developing contempt for our generals as well.
Fred,
I don't think anon literally meant eat a baby alive. It's obviously a metaphor. Nevertheless it does describe the democrat response to anything Trump. Blindly accept whatever criticism without any critical thinking or evaluation of the reasonableness of the claim. I'm reminded of the experiment with Pavlov and his dogs.
"After-birth abortion: why should the baby live
Euthanasia in infants has been proposed by philosophers for children with severe abnormalities whose lives can be expected to be not worth living and who are experiencing unbearable suffering"
"Generally, when a newborn's life is contested ..."
Contested by whom? Slavering death dealers of the Left?
Have you heard of Peter Singer?
There are a few other ethicists of his ilk that go that far.
Recently, newly minted Leftists at college campuses have been caught on tape saying that
killing a two year old is nothing as they are nonpersons still at that point. It all goes to show that PhDs in the humanities have taught well skulls full of mush the finer points of liberalism.
Then there is our very own Barack Obama that would not condemn a baby born in a hospital being shelved until it died from lack of attention.
"NRLC objects. They point to evidence that SB 1082, the bill Obama voted against in committee, was amended to contain a "neutrality clause" that is identical to one contained in the federal law. (The Illinois government’s legislative information Web site shows the proposed amendment, but doesn’t give results for votes in committee. NRLC’s documents show that the amendment was adopted.) Since he voted against the state bill, NRLC says, his claimed worry about Roe v. Wade is a smokescreen, intended to cover up his unconcern with the protection of infant lives."
I could search more and find other stories. There have been 2 by PJ Media of college people saying offing 2 or 3 year olds is okay. But it is really hard when the drones at Google enforce liberal fascism.
I got this message.
"Our systems have detected unusual traffic from your computer network. This page checks to see if it's really you sending the requests, and not a robot. Why did this happen?"
Really?
Here were my dangerous search terms.
college site:pjmedia.com
&
college abortion site:pjmedia.com
You got to love the Left, a bunch of ruthless MoFers.
http://jme.bmj.com/content/39/5/261
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_euthanasia
B. Poster = Guccifer 3.0 ?
Post a Comment