Alice Martines, Stars and Stripes/Washington Post: In America's hidden war in Syria, troops face peril on many fronts
RAQQA, Syria — This ruined, fearful city was once the Islamic State's capital, the showcase of its caliphate and a magnet for foreign fighters from around the globe.
Now it lies at the heart of the United States' newest commitment to a Middle East war.
The commitment is small, a few thousand troops who were first sent to Syria three years ago to help the Syrian Kurds fight the Islamic State. President Donald Trump indicated in March that the troops would be brought home once the battle is won, and the latest military push to eject the group from its final pocket of territory recently got underway.
In September, however, the administration switched course, saying the troops will stay in Syria pending an overall settlement to the Syrian war and with a new mission: to act as a bulwark against Iran's expanding influence.
Read more ....
WNU Editor: There are growing calls for U.S. forces to leave Syria .... When Will Trump Bring Home U.S. Forces from Syria? (National Interest). My prediction is that it will not happen. When U.S. forces left Iraq the country quickly fragmented along sectarian lines and the Islamic State rushed in to fill the security concerns of Iraq's Sunni Arabs. It quickly became a disaster that took three years of war and tens of thousands of casualties to downgrade ISIS into the small terror group that they have become. What happened in Iraq gives legitimacy to those who are arguing that the same thing will happen if U.S. forces withdraw from eastern Syria, and in my opinion they are justified. But should the U.S. be involved in what is now a sectarian conflict, and is this a national security priority for Washington. At the moment the consensus is yes .... but fears of a U.S. military presence staying for years in eastern Syria are also justified, even though only a few people are voicing it right now.
4 comments:
FAKE NEWS. Deep State? LOCK HER UP! CHUDS? MAGA! KAGA. Unindicted co-conspirator 1. “Yeah, but I won't be here,”
The USA has decided that eastern Syria is so important that it is willing to sacrifice Turkish-USA alliance, fight with Russian mercenaries and kill hundreds of them, risk combat with regular Russian forces and launch air attacks against Assad forces knowing Russians might get killed.
Some risks, what are the rewards? I understand this engagement benefits Israel and the petro Sunni states, so rewards have to be coming from them. What are those?
The Turkish-USA "Alliance" has been dying for decades. Additionally the Kurdish people have been the one of the few groups in the area that actually like us.
So we are effectively supporting the formation of a Kurdish state in Northeast-Syria. This has the benefit of stabilizing the region more easily because of lessened internal ethnic divisions.
I wish we allowed the rest of the middle east to fragment in such ways. Then maybe we would hear so much about ethnic cleansing.
Anon 11:04AM,
Iran.
Post a Comment