(Photo: CrowdStrike Holdings)
USA Today: What to know about CrowdStrike, the cybersecurity company mentioned in Trump's phone call with Zelensky
WASHINGTON – The cybersecurity company CrowdStrike was thrust into the national spotlight Wednesday after the summary of a phone call between President Donald Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart showed Trump raised questions about the California-based technology company.
According to the summary released Wednesday, Trump asked Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to look into an issue involving CrowdStrike during their July 25 conversation.
According to the summary, Trump told Zelensky: “I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike… I guess you have one of your wealthy people... The server, they say Ukraine has it.”
Read more ....
WNU Editor: This is an earlier remark that I made on CrowdStrike ....
.... But the big bombshell in this transcript is the U.S. President asking for help from the Ukraine President on Crowd Strike, a cyber security company that accused Russia of hacking into the Democrat parties servers. It is Crowd Strike's conclusion that Russia hacked into the Democrat servers that became the basis for the entire Russian-collusion narrative, and it is clear to me that President Trump wants to know the who/what/where/and why behind this company and its ties to the Democrat Party, and why they did what they did. This bit of information was not disclosed by the whistle-blower, and if it was I am sure the Democrats and the media would be doing a different narrative right now.
Kudos to USA Today for pointing out why CrowdStrike should be discussed. No one else is.
6 comments:
Really editor. Cloud strike has no ties to the Democratic Party. It has done work for both parties and many other entities. And Trump is pushing a right wing conspiracy theory about a missing DNC server. All forensic evidence was turned over to the FBI. USA today is not pointing out why cloud strike should be discussed.
https://www.cyberscoop.com/donald-trump-crowdstrike-ukraine-phone-call/
another view of the reality of the Trump call and Crowd Strike
Crowdstrike: The Truth About Trump’s Insane Ukraine ‘Server’ Conspiracy
Blackdog. I don't know..but. .if there is no "there there", why do Democrats go BALLISTIC for just asking questions? Why this coordinated and syndicated attack? ;)
Crowdstrike is a big ldgitimit company. They alllowed themselves to be used.among friends.
If forced to make statements under oath, they will back off or add heavy layer of conditional language to their findings.
Crowdstrike is guilty period.
When you make a pronouncement of international implications thus making foreign policy and then refuse to let the government see the physical god damn server, you are the Democrat's party's bitch and always will be.
Excusing yourself and saying the Democrats are the ones not letting the FBI see the server is disingenuous.
At that point Crowdstrike should have used their leverage of future business with the Democrats to forces them to to turnover the server immediately. At this point anything Crowdstrike says is a day late and a dollar short. It is meant to protect future business and not to get to the bottom of the matter.
Saying that a company does business with both parties is a red herring. Volume and dollar amount is important with such an argument. A one liner is a throw away shit.
Crowdstrike is the DNC's Bitch and the DNC love her loooooong time!
Post a Comment