Thursday, November 28, 2019

Three In Four Americans Support Foreign Military Interventions Even If There Is No Direct Threat To The U.S.

The majority of Americans support sending troops abroad to defend freedom and fight human rights violations, regardless of threats to the U.S., according to a new survey. (Airman 1st Class Zoe M. Wockenfuss/Air Force)

Military.com: Most Americans think US military should ‘defend freedom abroad,’ survey says

Three out of four Americans believe that U.S. troops should intervene overseas when freedom is threatened or human rights abuses are apparent in other countries, according to a survey released Tuesday.

More than 1,000 U.S. adults responded to the second annual national defense survey conducted by the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Institute. Most of them believe the U.S. should have a more active foreign policy, and be more engaged in international affairs.

“Although pollsters have long noted the existence of isolationist sentiment in the U.S., the pervasiveness of this perspective is debatable. Here we find it to be very much in the minority,” according to the survey’s executive summary.

Read more
....

Update: It’s Freedom Time! Three in Four Americans Support Foreign Military Interventions, Survey Finds (Sputnik)

WNU Editor: Here is a summary on what is U.S. public opinion when it comes to foreign military interventions ....

.... This general support for engagement includes a willingness to use U.S. military forces, even when there is no direct threat to the U.S. By a 55-point margin—76% support, 22% do not support—Americans support using U.S. military forces to prevent human rights violations in other countries. By the same 55-point margin—again, 76% support, 22% do not support—they favor using U.S. military forces to defend freedom in other countries. If the U.S. is directly threatened, the percent supporting a possible military response goes even higher: by a 75-point margin—87% support, 11% do not support—Americans support using U.S. military forces to eliminate potential threats to the U.S. before they strike.

I am personally surprised by this poll. That if there is no direct threat to the U.S., 76% would support using U.S. military forces to prevent human rights violations in other countries and/or to defend freedom in other countries.

The Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Institute's poll is here .... Results from the 2019 Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation & Institute National Defense Survey.

5 comments:

Unknown said...

Bring back conscription. That'll soon change their minds if they have to do the fighting & dying instead of leaving it to professional cannon fodder.

Adam said...

That percentage is downright scary imo. Most civilians are so far removed from the people in the military that they would actually support this. Smh

Andrew Jackson said...

We taxpayers want to see action 'get out there and kill MFers,LOL!!!

Nicolas Darkwater said...

I don't see this as a blank check, but something that Americans would consider, on a case-by-case basis, rather than eliminate the possibility altogether.

Anonymous said...

Bad guys can always snowball.

Hitler started with a 100,000 man army. Amazing what he did given the Skoda works (in another country) for free. If Dunkirk had fallen faster and 40,000 or less British soldiers had escaped, might Hitler had British ports and British shipyards?

Genghis Khan started small. Ditto Tamerlane. ISIS started small and mushroomed.