Saturday, December 7, 2019

North Korea's U.N. Ambassador Says Denuclearization Is Off The Table In Talks With The U.S.



DW: North Korea says denuclearization off the table in US talks

North Korea does not need "lengthy talks" with the US and denuclearization is "already gone out of the negotiating table," Pyongyang's UN envoy said. "We'll see," responded US President Donald Trump.

The talks between Pyongyang and Washington are merely a "time-saving trick" for the US administration to advance its "domestic political agenda," the North Korean ambassador to the UN said on Friday, apparently referencing the 2020 election campaign.

"We do not need to have lengthy talks with the US now and denuclearization is already gone out of the negotiating table," ambassador Kim Song said.

Song also slammed the UK, France, Germany, Poland, Belgium and Estonia in his statement, after those countries condemned Pyongyang's repeated ballistic tests.

Read more ....

WNU Editor: President Trump and South Korea Moon know that they have a problem .... Trump, Moon discuss ‘grave’ Korea tensions in Saturday phone call (NYPost).

More News On North Korea's U.N. Ambassador Saying Denuclearization Is Off The Table In Talks With The U.S.

North Korea says denuclearization not on negotiating table -- ABC News/AP
North Korea's U.N. envoy says denuclearization off negotiating table with United States -- Reuters
North Korea says denuclearization off the table in US talks -- The Guardian
North Korea says denuclearization is off the table in talks with US -- France 24
North Korea says denuclearization is now OFF 'negotiation table' with US - and accuses Trump of using talks as ‘time-saving trick’ to help his reelection bid -- Daily Mail
North Korea's UN ambassador says denuclearization is off the table in talks with US -- CNN
N. Korea envoy at UN says denuclearization ‘already off the table’ in talks with US -- RT

9 comments:

Bob Huntley said...

Denuclearization as far as North Korea is concerned would amount to suicide.

Anonymous said...

Ukraine de-nuclearized. The US did not attack it.

There are 195 countries in the world. Most of them are non nuclear. Most of them do not follow your leftwing script.

Japan is non-nuclear. We have not attacked it, since 1945 (after they attacked us 1st). Japan in the 1980s was a very rich country and yet no attack.

The Phillipines was not attacked and they lawfully took the major bases. Yet no attack. There has to be all sort of mineral wealth there and yet no attack.

Think about . The islands are volcanic. There have to be a lot of metals there.

Bob Huntley said...

You missed the point totally which is that if a country has nukes it has a very strong deterrent against attack by anyone so why would a country give up its nukes especially if it is under attack already, in this case by the USA. Keep in mind that not all attacks involve military action but are attacks nonetheless.

By the way Vietnam was not nuclear but was attacked/invaded, for why again? Iraq was not nuclear but was attacked/invaded, for why again? Afghanistan was not nuclear but was attached/invaded, for why again?

If any of those three had had nukes they would not have been attacked/invaded. Of course you have to keep in mind that the fear of a nuke being launched against the US homeland is not the only concern where nukes are involved.

Anonymous said...

BTW why did the communists invade South Vietnam?

South Vietnam can trace its political roots from before the French or Japanese occupations. The communist North Vietnamese could not and cannot.

Why are you okay with China and Russia founding and arming Vietnamese communists to attack South Vietnam?

Why are you an ungrateful, lewd bitch?

Anonymous said...

A obstreperous nation with nukes that has invaded countries before is not necessarily less likely to be attacked because it has nukes. It might be more likely.

With stealth, hypersonic missiles, hacking, swarms and more, CC and launch sites might be all hit within 1 to 5 minutes and the little tin horn dictator won't have so much as a phone and a pen to do anything.

________________

Afghanistan was attacked because they harbored a terrorists group , who conducted and admitted to the 911 terrorists attacks. They harbored these terrorists and refused to extradite them. Remember Osama Bin Laden was living in and operating form Afghanistan in 2001 not your kitchen although you would like to believe otherwise.

Anonymous said...

Iraq had attacked 3 neighboring countries in 10 years. It had a nuclear weapons program. Some of it had been dismantled, but in such a large country how can you be sure?

With all the roadblocks that the Iraqis put up for inspectors, if inspectors are delayed w 2 or 3 days from inspecting a site and then get in, can you proved to me that stuff was not there?

You cannot. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

All that yellow cake in Iraq went to Canada BTW.

I would also like to point out that you're the moron that does not know much at all about separating radioactive isotopes. So when your read an 'article', you do not have a fucking clue what you are reading.

Anonymous said...

"Keep in mind that not all attacks involve military action but are attacks nonetheless."

First, it sound like you are threatening.

Second, prove that it is a moral imperative that you must trade with a rogue regime.

Was the US morally obligated to sell Japan iron ore and oil in 1940, when it was killing 20 to 50 million people in China? Go on you shit, make that argument. I wait to hear what Leftist pablum you'll recite.

Bob Huntley said...

Rambling and obfuscation do not an argument make and you still have not even attempted to answer the question about the massive upward socialism evident in the USA and especially since Trump got in.

Anonymous said...

Worthless Fuck Bob made the following generalized statement.

"Keep in mind that not all attacks involve military action but are attacks nonetheless."

I refuted that generalization with a concrete example.

Was the US morally obligated to sell Japan iron ore and oil in 1940, when it was killing 20 to 50 million people in China?

You lost Bob.