A watchtower in a high-security facility near what is believed to be a camp where mostly Muslim ethnic minorities are detained in China. (file photo)
The Hill: US sanctions Chinese officials, paramilitary agency over Uighur abuses
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced new sanctions on Friday against Chinese officials and a government entity over Uighur human rights abuses he called the “stain of the century.”
The latest sanctions come amid spiraling relations between the U.S. and China, with the Trump administration stepping up actions against Beijing on multiple fronts in an attempt at changing the behavior of the Chinese Communist Party.
The sanctions target the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (XPCC) and two of its officials, Pompeo said in a statement.
The XPCC, a paramilitary organization that operates under the control of Beijing, has been criticized as being a tool of repression against minority Uighurs in the Xinjiang region.
Read more ....
More News On The U.S. Imposing Sanctions On China Over Rights Abuses In Xinjiang
U.S. imposes sanctions on Chinese company over abuse of Uighurs -- Reuters
US imposes sanctions on Chinese 'state-within-a-state' linked to Xinjiang abuses -- Guardian/AFP
U.S. Adds Sanctions Over Internment of Muslims in China -- New York Times
US ramps up sanctions over Uighur abuses with penalties on powerful Chinese paramilitary group -- ABC News
U.S. Slaps Sanctions On Chinese Entity, Individuals Over Rights Abuses In Xinjiang -- RFE
Pompeo sanctions China over human rights abuses against the Uyghurs, calling it the 'stain of the century' -- FOX News
U.S. sanctions China's paramilitary in Xinjiang -- Axios
4 comments:
Didn't the US drop a bunch of bombs on the Muslim countries in the past?
Couldn't ever begin to wonder why. How about yourself anon?
What a dumb....stance to take. LOL
Well, even I like the F-35, this plane is made for "contested zone". If Canada is becoming a contested zone that's a big trouble bigger than the plane. Canada need to defend itself and the F-18 can do that. Let aside the cost of 88 F-35, which is still not 100% operational.
Post a Comment