* U.S. Capitol Police said they are ready for Saturday's 'Justice for J6' rally and vowed not to have a repeat of January 6th
* Tall, black fencing was installed around the perimeter of the Capitol as police are preparing for the possibility that some demonstrators may arrive with weapons
* Underprepared police allowed for hundreds of Trump supporters to break into the Capitol to interrupt the certification of Joe Biden's victory on Jan. 6
* While police are confident things will be under control, residents and business owners whose memories of this year's violent riot is still fresh, are not so sure
The U.S. Capitol is once again shielded by fences as law enforcement prepare for a protest in support of the January 6 rioters who stormed the Capitol earlier this year.
Snaps taken Friday night show the Capitol building ringed with high metal fencing amid fears it could once again be stormed by people protesting Donald Trump's 2020 election loss.
After being caught off guard in January, law enforcement announced they will be out in full force on Saturday for the 'Justice for J6' rally being held in support of rioters imprisoned after the violent Jan. 6 insurrection.
Read more ....
WNU Editor: There is a lot of media hype that there will be violence today. My gut says the opposite.
More News On Today's 'Justice For J6' Rally In Washington DC
'We are prepared': Law enforcement stresses readiness ahead of right-wing rally -- ABC News
Massive Capitol security operation awaits rally to support hundreds charged in deadly January riot -- USA Today
'We're not taking any chances': Capitol Police ramp up security ahead of rally for pro-Trump rioters -- Yahoo News
100 National Guard troops are on standby to support Capitol Police during pro-Trump rally Saturday -- CNBC
14 comments:
I have seen no hype that there will be violence but just the opposite: many would-be participants are told to stay away because it is an "FBI trap."
This time proper prevention steps have been taken. Social media that I have seen suggests some few are calling out for violence, but then such calls can be found daily at this site in comments on a regular basis by such well named people as Anon.
You sound really concerned 10:13. Perhaps you could link an example. I suppose you are talking about Mr. Nuremberg 2.0. I think he said he was not an American. I figures he is western European. Maybe he is a concerned Western European. At time I have my doubts and figure he is working for law enforcement to entrap people are working for a foreign government to divide the American people.
In all but one thing Nuremberg 2.0 is correct. 2.0 is extremely histrionic and I believe that his intent is to get people in trouble. That said most of what he writes is true.
We were treated to more hypocrisy. If masks were effective or the virus that bad, then why were the Met Gala attendees not wearing masks, They were not, but the low wage wait staff were.
AOC’s Met Gala appearance sparks new ‘GALA’ law
If you try reading something other than NY Post tabloid you would learn that all attendees at the gala (the Met) were required to show vaccine report.
as for what I had said earlier:
The Proud Boys Say They Aren’t Coming. DC Is Bracing for Violence Anyway.
includes warning of "FBI plan to entrap"
When you chart death rates versus government responses as scatterplot and look at flu, corona and small pox, the government response look in no way responsible, it looks like a power grab.
Pfizer pushing booster shots looks liker a money grab. People like to talk about MIC, but here it looks like we have a big pharma-government industrial complex.
IF MIC is spending needless money, it can blow your budget and create unsustainable debt. The big pharma-government industrial complex does the same, but it also tanks the economy faster and intrudes on every aspect of your life and civil liberties.
"If you try reading something other than NY Post tabloid you would learn that all attendees at the gala (the Met) were required to show vaccine report."
Lot of places and lots of Democrat ne'er do wells are mandating people mask even if they are vaccinated. So what were you bellyaching about>
About FBI entrapment. Consider the the Gov. Whitmer case. Without half the people being government informants and being egged on would the other 6 or 7 guys entertained the idea.
Let's assume those 6 or 7 people are low IQ like yourself. It is a good assumption. Those 6 or 7 guys like any good chimp can count. They would look around see they had too few people, put the idea on old or given it up. With another 10 or 20 years of life they would look back on it and think "That was aa stupid idea."
I believe the FBI had the informants delete their texts. Why would they do that? So that the jury cannot see the informants were egging people on.
Do you really want to defend any and all efforts of the FBI? Like the FBI ignoring Larry Nassar? Ignoring Epstein or using him as an informant?
I could defend some agents and some FBI investigations, but the number that I cannot keeps growing. So do you still want to defend any and all FBI efforts?
You might like to learn that the Pharm industry spends twice as much money for lobbying than any of the other 9 leading lobby groups. But that said, the real issue is that we need the shots and the govt is funding most of it. The data all indicates that the vaccines offer protection, save lives. If that enriches this or that company, so be it. I prefer to stay alive rather than deprive a company of its profits.
Federal Bureau Of Incompetence: An Analysis Of The FBI’s Most Embarrassing Failures
FDA panel votes 16-2 AGAINST recommending to approve Pfizer booster shots to healthy people under 65 because there is not enough evidence they are safe and effective
"The data all indicates that the vaccines offer protection, save lives."
No Pfizer went beyond saving live while making money to potentially hurting thousands of people to grub for money.
My gut has a similar feeling WNU. I really hope it's a big nothing and they all look like fools.
Arson is considered peaceful protesting these days......
Federal officers in Portland suffered 113 eye injuries from lasers, DHS official says
Most peaceful and you can only get away with it, if you are liberal.
Try a close reading of that tabloid link
The FDA said there was at this time no evidence that a third shot (booster) shot was safe. They did not say that the two shots were not safe. And they did say that a third shot needed for those over 54 or those with special health needs.
the shots work. Don't want it? Your choice. But private businesses and military and companies can require them--that is Their choice.
Keep posting those L's, losers!
Poor 4:34, our perennial loser, never showed us that she had the slightest inkling about the difference between an EUA and a full blown approval.
Post a Comment