* Paratroopers with the U.S. Army's 82nd Airborne Division prepare for deployment to Eastern Europe from Fort Bragg, North Carolina on February 3, 2022
* The Biden administration announced on Wednesday that 3,000 U.S. troops are being sent to the region
* Of the deployments, around 1,700 troops are from the 82nd Airborne Division out of Fort Bragg
* Comes after U.S. officials revealed to the New York Times a Russian disinformation campaign with fake video showing fabricated genocide by Ukraine on Russian-speakers
* NATO warned on Thursday that Russia is amassing nuclear-capable missiles along with 30,000 troops in Belarus
The Kremlin was planning to release a fake video showing Ukraine attacking Russians, which the U.S. is hoping to foil by making public, a new report reveals as troops start deploying from Fort Bragg to Europe amid rising tensions.
A senior administration official shared with The New York Times details of acquired U.S. intelligence revealing plans for a fabricated video showing Ukraine involved in a 'genocide' against Russian-speaking people in Moscow's territories or in eastern Ukraine.
The individual did not want to share direct evidence of the plan in order to protect sources and methods.
Read more ....
WNU Editor: No evidence of these claims was provided.
US Officials Claim Russia Is Planning A False Flag Operation Against Ukraine Using A 'Graphic' Video
U.S. says new intel shows Russia plotting false flag attack -- AP
U.S. Says Russia Planned to Fabricate Pretext for Invasion -- New York Times
Russia plans ‘very graphic’ fake video as pretext for Ukraine invasion, US claims -- The Guardian
US says Russia planning video of fake Ukrainian attack with corpses, mourners to justify invasion -- ABC News
US alleges Russia planning false flag operation against Ukraine using 'graphic' video -- CNN
US reveals Russia may plan to create fake pretext for Ukraine invasion -- The Hill
U.S. reveals Russian plot to use fake video as pretense for Ukraine invasion -- CBS News
Russia Considering Fake Video With ‘Corpses’ As Pretext For Ukrainian Invasion, Pentagon Says -- Defense One
U.S. accuses Russia of planning "staged" video as pretext for Ukraine attack -- Axios
8 comments:
No evidence because none exists.
https://twitter.com/feliciasonmez/status/1489321450251169798
At today's WH and State Dept press briefings, reporters pressed for evidence to back up U.S. gov't statements about recent events in Syria and Russia, respectively. In response, officials suggested those reporters might be more inclined to believe ISIS/the Kremlin. Yikes.
Aboard AF1, a reporter asked WH press secretary Jen Psaki for evidence to back up the claim that Qurayshi denotated a suicide bomb.
Psaki asked whether skeptics think the U.S. military is "not providing accurate information and ISIS is providing accurate information."
The reporter did not back down:
"But I mean, the U.S. has not always been straightforward about what happens with civilians," she said. "And I mean, that is a fact."
Then, at the State Department, spokesman Ned Price was repeatedly asked for evidence of the U.S. government's claim that Russia plans to create a "false flag" propaganda video as a pretext for invading Ukraine.
Price responded: "If you doubt the credibility of the U.S. government, of the British government, of other governments and want to, you know, find solace in information that the Russians are putting out, that is for you to do."
It's the job of reporters to ask for proof to back up government statements. Doing so does not mean one believes propaganda put out by U.S. adversaries. I imagine these officials know that. Are they simply throwing out these accusations in an effort to deter further Qs?
The reporters in question were NPR White House correspondent
@ayesharascoe and AP Diplomatic Writer Matt Lee (@APDiploWriter).
Administration got the idea from Lapides.
the US is the expert when it comes to false flags and invasions
Excellent post. The policies of the leadership class are generally not supportable meaning their only real option is to do this or to accuse those who do not support or would dare question them as being agents of a foreign nation.
https://twitter.com/cspan/status/1489329356644229132
Video of the embarrassing exchange between the AP reporter and the SD spokesman.
Wow! 5 comments and three of them from trolls.
Comment #1 (The stupid troll)
Comment #3
Comment #4 (The obnoxious troll)
Wow! One comment that has no substance except to express an impotent anger at how poorly his home team is handling this mess.
Wow, one comment at 12:10 that has no substance and serves no purpose. Which comment were you referring to Meathead?
The dipfucker who left, who copied and pasted an entire magazine article?
Or was it the troll that has been called out as a Russian troll or Russian fanboy since 2014/2015? You want to defend him?
Post a Comment