* Emily Kohrs has been giving clues about grand jury in series of interviews
* She has been on a cable TV media tour touting her involvement in the case
* Trump cited her and bashed Georgia's 'illegal Kangaroo Court'
The forewoman on the Georgia grand jury that could indict Donald Trump laughed and said she 'kind of wanted' to subpoena him just to get the chance to swear him in – on a bizarre media tour that is already causing headaches for prosecutors.
In just one of her multiple interviews about a usually shrouded process, forewoman Emily Kohrs told MSNBC why she personally wanted to hear from Trump. 'I wanted to hear from the former president, but honestly, I wanted to subpoena the former president because I got to swear everybody in,' she said.
'And so I thought it would be really cool to get 60 seconds with President Trump, of me looking at him and be like, "Do you solemnly swear," and me getting to swear him in,' she continued.
Read more ....
WNU Editor: More details on the grand jury forewoman are being revealed .... REVEALED: Georgia grand jury forewoman who said it would have been 'awesome' to subpoena Trump is a 'WITCH' who shares spells and magic on wacky Pinterest page (Daily Mail).
What a train wreck. This is every prosecutor's nightmare.
Former President Trump's Legal Team Blasts Georgia Inquiry
Trump lawyers blast election probe after grand juror speaks -- AP
Trump Legal Team Assails Georgia Inquiry -- DNYUZ/New York Times
Georgia juror unsettles Trump investigation with revealing interviews -- Washington Post
Trump Grand Juror Stirs Uproar by Hinting at Panel’s Advice -- Bloomberg
CNN Panel Cringes At Trump Grand Jury Foreperson’s ‘Painful’ Media Appearances -- Huffington Post
16 comments:
Yes, Dimmocrats are beyond stupid and this Dimmocrat brainless bimbo definitely just destroyed the case. It'll be appealed for years.
If Dimmocrats spent a quarter of the time they are spending on Trump to prosecute real crimonals you could walk safely through Atlanta, which is now (and has had 49 years of black Dimmocrat mayoral control) a crime ridden dump.
Notice how social she is? She has complete control over her facial muscles. She has spent so much time gossiping and socializing enabling her to have complete control over her muscles and voice, but there is not an original thought in her head and not much worth knowing.
She is a very social ape. Peak ape in fact.
Just watch the video clip without sound to concentrate on her facial expressions. She is very taken with herself.
2:29 dead on. This nieve arrogant woman is typical of most Americans. What a highly irresponsible move on her part, and who on earth made a 30 year old the forewoman of a grand jury case of this size. Just like everything else going on in this country I wonder... "what the hell are they thinking??"
That’s just it, there is no thinking going on anymore.
she claims she has not voted in the past two presidential elections, and yet you blame the Dems? That jury was assembled because of what Trump, had done, which might have been illegal. And so it is a Democrat thing? Let the system and not YOU decide if those who might be indicted are guilty or not or if they should be brought to trail.
As for age: is there a legal age requirement to serve? She is more than a child.
But doesn’t appear to be in her prime. I say, let’s see if sh floats.
Educated idiot. The majority are very similar. These are the guys who developed the small gas can that is now mandatory. They have no common sense
oy vey
Oh she appears to be a child. Jesus. 30 years old.. immature, irresponsible. Enough to not be on a jury period. And oh yes.. you know it's a Democrat thing. This is politics not justice
Ah, c'mon, lay off her. She's an idiot, but at least she's being honest
She is not a professional politician, but she is a part time combatant.
LOL - Looks like another idiotic Democrat/Media self-own in their asinine quest to destroy Trump.
/in a long series of johnson-stepping.
If those making comments would ut aside the stupid snark and look at what goes on according to the law they would see or learn that that Grand Jury merely is recommending to the DA and then another Grand Jury will be formed to decide. What she said in public will be used perhaps as a delaying tactic but legally she did not do anything that could possibly ut a stop to whatever the DA and new Grand Jury decide.
7:13 PM
Actually you're wrong on that. Whatever machinations begin now, this is the anatomy of a mistrial.
So Fred Lapides (7:13) thinks he is legal expert, now.
TDS is strong in that one.
Post a Comment