Tuesday, February 21, 2023

Russia Suspends Its Participation In New START Treaty

 

RT: Russia suspends last nuclear treaty with US  

Russian President Vladimir Putin has announced the country’s temporary withdrawal from the New START Treaty  

Moscow is suspending its participation in the last remaining nuclear treaty between Russia and the US, President Vladimir Putin has announced. During his key address to the Russian parliament on Tuesday, he noted that Moscow will not exit the New START Treaty, but is temporarily withdrawing.  

Read more ....

WNU Editor:  This is definitely not a good day for nuclear arms control.

 Russia Suspends Its Participation In New START Treaty  

Russia suspends its participation in New START treaty — Putin -- TASS  

Putin Announces Suspension of New START Treaty, Orders New Strategic Systems Be Put on Combat Duty -- Sputnik  

Russia suspends only remaining major nuclear treaty with US -- AP 

Putin delivers nuclear warning to the West over Ukraine -- Reuters  

Putin says Russia will halt participation in New Start nuclear arms treaty -- The Guardian  

Putin says Russia will suspend role in New START nuclear accord with U.S. -- Washington Post 

Putin suspends nuclear arms treaty, adding to tensions with US on Ukraine war anniversary -- USA Today 

Russia suspends participation in New START nuclear treaty with US, Putin says -- FOX News  

Putin pulls back from last remaining nuclear arms control pact with the US -- CNN  

Putin announces Russia is suspending nuclear arms deal with US in stark warning over war on Ukraine -- The Independent  

Vladimir Putin suspends last nuclear treaty with US, puts new missiles on combat duty -- ABC News

 Australia 

Putin: Russia to suspend participation in last remaining nuclear treaty with U.S. -- Axios

19 comments:

Anonymous said...

After the sad charade from the IAEA regarding the shelling at Zaporizhia the Russians are rightfully wary of Washington's "international" institutions. They don't want the "inspectors" pilfering the newest generation hypersonic's secrets.

Anonymous said...

Nuclear arms control died due to Biden administration incompetence in dealing with Ukraine and Russia. Ukraine and Libya gave up there nukes and technology, look what happened to both.
or big power
The word is if you have a nuke your safe from a USA invasion, ask Kim Jong Un, we'll do nothing to stop him.

Iran too, Israel and Ben Netanyahu will need to take care of that, just like they did with Saddam and Assad's nukes, BOOM!

Balless Biden, Blinken, Harris and Sullivan will jump up and down and scream but Israel is going in, with or without our support.

If Iran does get a bomb, the nuke arms race will spread like wildfire to Egypt, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Qatar and Bahrain, and who knows, even Iraq.

Anonymous said...

and trump did what? kiss Putin's ass. Name a time, a place, an instance where Trump ever stood up to Putin...and even now, a failed president who lies about the election can not bring himself to say a bad word about the invasion of Ukraine by Putin.

Anonymous said...

Even before Mr. Putin dismissed the implementation of the treaty’s required inspections as “nonsense,” it was already in deep trouble. The State Department had announced last month that the Russians were out of compliance with their treaty obligations.

Mr. Putin made clear that he was not pulling out of the treaty, which expires in February 2026. Nor did he threaten to deploy more strategic nuclear weapons — the kind that can soar across continents — beyond the limits of the treaty, which keeps both sides to 1,550 nuclear weapons.

But he made clear that the United States would not be inspecting Russian nuclear sites, a central element of verifying compliance with the treaty.

Anonymous said...

>Name a time, a place, an instance where Trump ever stood up to Putin


2017
----

Dec 5
Sanctions – In response to alleged hacking scheme

Sep 30
Sanctions – In response to alleged 2018 election interference

Sep 26
Sanctions – In response to support for Syria

Aug 2
Sanctions – In response to the staged Salisbury attack

May 16
Sanctions – Expansion of the Magnitsky Act

Mar 15
Sanctions – In response to rising tensions on the Kerch Strait

Mar 11
Sanctions – In response to dealings with Venezuela

Feb 1
Diplomatic action – Withdrawing from the INF Treaty


2018
----

Dec 21
Military – $10 million in military assistance transferred to the Kiev govt

Dec 19
Sanctions – In response to Russiagate hysteria

Oct 4
Indictments – 7 GRU officers charged for activities related to hacking

Sep 20
Sanctions – Expansion of Russiagate hysteria sanctions to 33 more individuals

Sep 12
Executive Order – Trump signed order freezing assets of individuals accused of election meddling

Aug 21
Sanctions – Further cyber related sanctions

Aug 8
Sanctions – In response to the staged Salisbury attack

Jul 13
Indictments – 12 more Russian intel officers charged for cyber-related activities

Jun 11
Sanctions – 8 more Russian entities sanctioned for cyber-related activities

Apr 6
Sanctions – 24 Russian oligarchs and govt officials sanctioned

Mar 26
Expulsions – 48 Russian embassy officials expelled from Washington and Seattle

Mar 25
Expulsions – 12 Russian embassy expelled in New York

Mar 15
Sanctions – 24 Russian entities sanctioned in response to Russiagate hysteria

Feb 16
Indictments – 16 Russian entities sanctioned in response to Russiagate hysteria

Feb 7
Military Action – 100 Russian troops killed in US missile attack in Syria

Jan 26
Sanctions – 30 Russian entities sanctioned in response to Ukraine conflict

Dec 22
Announcement – Provision of lethal weapons to Ukraine

Dec 20
Sanctions – Global Magnitsky Act

Dec 19
Export restrictions – In response to supposed INF Treaty violations

Aug 2
Legislation – President Trump signs Russia sanctions bill into law (CAATSA)

----

It can go on and on, but even just two years is enough to demonstrate that you're a zealot for whom factuality doesn't matter.

Anonymous said...

Lapides spotted 12:25, 12:43 (NYT copy & paste) and 1:06

Putin did not invade Ukraine when Trump was president, so no need for sharply worded diplomatic protests.

The same people, who complain about Trump not writing protest notes, thought it was great to waste Trump's time with the bogus Mueller investigation and impeachments.


on the back foot/put someone on the back foot

https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/on-the-back-foot-put-someone-on-the-back-foot

Putting Trump on the back foot or trying to is all the Demoncraps did. The they complain that certain things did not get done.

Anonymous said...

those sanctions were imposed by Congress and not by Trump

Democracy Dies in Darkness

Subscribe

This article was published more than 2 years ago
Global Opinions
Opinions
Editorial Board
War in Ukraine
Submit a guest opinion
Opinion
No, Trump has not been ‘tough’ on Russia
By Edward Fishman
,
James Lamond
and
Max Bergmann

October 13, 2020 at 4:14 p.m. EDT
Then-President-elect Donald Trump and former New York mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani pose for photographs as Giuliani arrives at the Trump National Golf Club Bedminster clubhouse in Bedminster, N.J., on Nov. 20, 2016. (Carolyn Kaster/AP)
Comment
75
Gift Article
Share

Edward Fishman served as a member of the secretary of state’s policy planning staff during the Obama administration and is a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council. James Lamond is a fellow at the Center for American Progress. Max Bergmann, a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, served in the State Department from 2011 to 2017.
Sign up for a weekly roundup of thought-provoking ideas and debates

Last month, the Treasury Department announced new sanctions against four Kremlin-linked figures for their efforts to interfere in the upcoming U.S. presidential election. The measures were met with acclaim as a long-awaited response to Russia’s interventions in American democracy.

In reality, though, these measures are little more than a pinprick — the latest episode in a long history of efforts by the Trump administration to appear tough on Russia while actually signaling to the Kremlin that U.S. elections remain open to interference. The simple fact is that even harsh-looking sanctions have little impact when there’s zero political will to enforce them.

The Treasury Department’s actions imposed asset freezes on Andriy Derkach, a Ukrainian politician and alleged Kremlin agent, and three mid-level bureaucrats at a Russian troll farm. None of these individuals, however, are likely to own significant financial holdings in the West, so the sanctions will have minimal impact on their lives. Even if they do, the measures will certainly not affect the Kremlin’s decision-making.

Anonymous said...

Putin did not invade Ukraine while Trump was president
right: he waited for Biden because he knew Biden would do nothing!
stop jerking off and get real

Anonymous said...

Putin didn't invade while Trump was president because Trump tried to stop the disastrous boomerang invasion of the Donbass. If the nazi occupied govt doesn't amass 80k troops to attack Donetsk then Russia doesn't invade. Simple as.

Anonymous said...

Trump Defends Putin as Biden Visits War-Torn Ukraine

Anonymous said...

37 times Trump was soft on Russia

Anonymous said...

Eric Trump is touring with another antisemite who shares pro-Hitler propaganda

Anonymous said...

“Would Be, You, Would We Be, Would We The, All of Allies Would Be United, or Divided?”

- Blubbering Fool Joe Biden in Warsaw

Anonymous said...

yep
Biden is the first American president to go into a war zone without the presence of the American military
but you, Mr smartypants belittle?
shame on you. His appearance there is noted as a remarkable one.
trailer trash always shows itself

Anonymous said...

Trump has been reluctant to impose sanctions on Russia amid his efforts to improve relations between Washington and Moscow, and as recently as this week he continued his attempts to cast doubt on Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. Last year, the Trump administration was slow to enact sanctions punishing Russia for that interference.

A Senate aide said it was widely known among Democrats and Republicans working on sanctions that Trump was angry when the Treasury and State departments made the determination last fall that Russia was failing to prove it was no longer using chemical weapons, triggering a second round of sanctions under US law.

Though Treasury and the State Department had done all the legwork to prepare the mandatory sanctions, the White House failed to act on them.

With the sanctions more than six months overdue, lawmakers from both sides of the aisle moved this week to apply pressure.

Anonymous said...


Biden is the first American president to go into a war zone without the presence of the American military

If you really believe this two things are apparent

a. You have never served in the military during any type dignitary visit.

b. You do not understand the lengths that the USG especially the DoD, SS, and INTEL agencies go to protect the POTUS.

BTW. do you know how many US military people are in Kiev right now? I understand that the MIL Group has one 1000 personnel assigned to it. And that is just the MILGRP.

Really for Joe or Don or any other POTUS is does not matter, they do the same.

Anonymous said...

Subscribe

This article was published more than 2 years ago
Global Opinions
Opinions
Editorial Board
War in Ukraine
Submit a guest opinion
Opinion


^^^

Who scribbles like that in the comments section? The person claiming to be Frederick R. Lapides.

Anonymous said...

Inside the Trump grand jury that probed election meddling

Anonymous said...

Inside the head of uniparty NPC