RT: Crimea invasion would kill 200,000 Ukrainian soldiers – ex-Zelensky aide
Kiev is “totally dependent” on the West and cannot take back territory through military means, Aleksey Arestovich has said
The cost of invading Crimea would be too high for Kiev, a former adviser to Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky, Aleksey Arestovich, said this week. The operation would likely lead to hundreds of thousands of casualties, he told Russian journalist Yulia Latynina.
There are “few prospects” of seizing the Crimean Peninsula through military means, Arestovich said, discussing the options remaining to Kiev in its conflict with Moscow.
Read more ....
WNU Editor: To put it into perspective. It took the German military 8 months and 6 Military Corps to capture Crimea during the Second World War (link here).
As for Aleksey Arestovich. He fell out of favor with Zelensky when he realized early this year that Ukraine will not be able to defeat Russia in this war .... Former Senior Advisor To Ukraine President Zelenskiy Says That It’s Very Unlikely That Ukraine Will Win The War (January 22, 2023).
9 comments:
Well , First you fire him, then you label him as a defeatist. So when he tells the truth and does not follows your narrative you can ban him and continue to discredit him through your msm minions aka partners.
Kind of like twitter before musk.
Well, Jay Fahaquar or someone called WNU and s-head. WNU was incensed.
Jay was wrong. WNU is an idiot.
Russia loses. If Russia keeps Donbas and Crimea. It is like returning a volley in tennis by the skin of teeth, but now you are way out of bounds. There is no possibility of returning the ball after your opponents next hit. Russia is like that. there are more threats to Russia than "Ukraine" like Muslim demographic surge, declining birth rates, brain drain, China, etc.
Russia lost its 7 to 1 edge in artillery. It lost it tank superiority. It is losing much, much more. All it has going for it are it land mines and willingness to fuck over any Russian male who is not ruling class or a needed apparatchik.
A VDV general was cashiered. That does not bode well for Russia. It means that Putin's own worst enemy stares back at him from the mirror. Prigozhin might die a natural death from cancer in the next 1/2 year to year. It maybe why a hit has not been ordered. Between Prigozhin's allegations and the cashiering of the general, you have to wonder just hw dysfunctional the kleptocracy of Russia is.
It is looking like Russia will fall. Not much to crow about, since if and when Michelle Obama san cursus honorum becomes US president, the US shall soon follow.
Your facts are incorrect and your logic is flawed.
The Russians still have lots of tanks and lots of artillery. Their munition and armaments industry are also out producing all of NATO.
That's one of th reasons the ukies lost Bakhmut and cannot break thorough the even the first defensive line.
The Ukies cannot even get enough people to fill the ranks unless they use a press gang.
And how did the Ukies manage to loose 1/3 of their Brads and Leopards if the Rusikies are so screwed up?
Where do you get your facts? From a Bubble gum machine?
Skoda if this is you, what is that new web site you are using , the Kaufman special? You need a change.
And yes skods, I am your favorite imaginary russian troll.
Ukrainian losses were due to mines. Mines have 5 to 1 payback.
If I say the Ukrainians have more tanks or artillery advantage, I did not say that the Russians did not have lots of tanks or artillery.
Let's make this very simple for the debauched Russian troll (5:16).
If Ukraine has more tanks in theatre than Russia, it does not mean that the Russian do not have a lot of tanks in theatre.
#FAILED_TROLL lol!
You are trying to get out of what you said Skoda deary.
Here is what you said.
Russia lost its 7 to 1 edge in artillery. It lost it tank superiority. It is losing much, much more. All it has going for it are it land mines.
You have never been in the military have you? At least not in the combat arms. Mine fields do not stop an offensive by themselves. In fact, mine fields are just about useless unless they are covered by direct and indirect fire. A good planned offensive takes mines and obstacles into account before jumping off.
Needless to say the Ukrainians did a poor job of planning and the Rusdians have more than enough firepower so that the ukies cannot even reach the first defensive line. Otherwise how did the ukies lose so much equipment ?
Oh I remember, it is because ( like you said) they kept on going into the mine fields, so it was not Russian superior fire power that destroyed all that equipment
but Ukrainian stupidity for continuing to go into mine fields after alot of thier people already got killed.
So you are saying the Ukrainians are stupid?
You have some real hard cognitive dissonance going on if you think the Russians are some how losing this war or are in jeopardy of losing the war.
Unless the Russians really screw up bad, the ukies will never regain their lost territory. At least with the force structure the Ukrainians have today.
Any way skods, you need to get different sources to get your info. The ones you have used in the last 6 months are not doing so hot. Have You been listening to Kaufman or the white house?
A lot of words 11:34 and you said nothing It was a word salad. Are you related to Kamala?
Skoda
Still covering your tracks with insults are we?
No skods, you will not be left of the hook.
Explain why the ukies cannot break through if the Russians are so weak and incomplete as you believe.
Gee Skoda, that should be easy. NATO and the US neocons all said the NATO weapons and training would be "game changers"
They would not lie to you, now would they skods?
Merely noted that you went the "lot of words, so I must of proved my point" route.
No skods, that is your lame excuse to cover your inability to make a coherent counter argument. Try again.
Post a Comment