Summit News: NY Times Calls For Biden to Appoint “Reality Czar” to Fight “Misinformation”NYTimes suggests the Biden administration needs to appoint a “reality czar” to deal with misinformation and extremism. https://t.co/jVNWNJ3e1C
— Seth Fiegerman (@sfiegerman) February 2, 2021
Here comes the Ministry of Truth.
The New York Times has amplified claims by “experts” who are calling for Joe Biden to appoint a “reality czar,” prompting critics to compare the idea to the Ministry of Truth in George Orwell’s 1984.
In an article entitled ‘How the Biden Administration Can Help Solve Our Reality Crisis’, the NYT’s Kevin Roose cites “experts” who are calling on “the Biden administration put together a cross-agency task force to tackle disinformation and domestic extremism, which would be led by something like a “reality czar.”
The job of this “reality czar” would be to head up “a centralized task force could coordinate a single, strategic response” to things like COVID-related and election fraud “conspiracy theories.”
Read more ....
WNU Editor: Growing up in the Soviet Union we had something like that but we called it the "propaganda czar".
21 comments:
Maybe the NY times could try verifying their sources perhaps?
Perhaps it is time to distinguish between an opinion piece written and appearing in the NY Times and a statement of what the NY Times "wants," which would be on their editorial page. The attempt here to make the paper conform to what YOU do not like tells us more about you than about the paper, which did NOT take that position.
Opinion pieces do not necessarily reflect overall on a newspaper.
In this case it does reflect on the New York Times.
There are the stories they omitted.
There is the ranking of these stories are not omitted, but are not given their due in the way they are billed. Like ranking stories by race and not by body count.
There are themed series of stories that if the colors were reversed, there would be cries of racism.
The day is coming before the next election that the NYT will be analyzed and all their article will be categorized and compared against the all the stories out there. It won't be pretty.
If an editorial page is incessant about a policy position and the newspaper stories are selected, omitted, or slanted based on the policy position, yes the editorial is indicative of the paper and adequately describes its bias.
Face it. The NYT is pure unadulterated shit ran by people unfit to have a real degree or a skilled trade.
Sir--
It was NOT an opinion of the NY Times editorial position on its editorial page. If you think otherwise, cite the page and post a link
so retarded look truth is inside of all man if u dont feel it 2 bad
Know nothing--
When the editorial board gets into trouble from its employees due to running an editorial from a conservative elected politician, the newspaper generally runs wall to wall leftwinger editorials and the editorial board has always written leftwing editorials, then R squared is .9 to .97, if not 1.0
Why do you keep lying?
Why do you keep lying?
You'll have to do better than that.
You'll have to do better than that.
You'll have to do better than that.
Keep trying
Keep trying
Keep trying
Keep trying
Keep trying
Not good enough, keep trying.
Not good enough, keep trying.
Keep trying
Keep trying
Keep trying
Post a Comment